A market test for natural monopoly in local exchange
Tóm tắt
Is the incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC) a natural monopolist? The analysis indicates that the LEC cost function is not supportable: LECs appear to be either nonsustainable natural monopolies or non natural monopolies over the set of services they currently offer. However, recent technological changes suggest that whether LECs are natural monopolies over their current offerings is immaterial for policy making, because competitors are enjoying economies of scope in offering both LEC and non LEC services. Based on these results, deregulation of LECs is discussed in a Type I/Type II error framework.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bain, John S. 1992. “Fiber Bypass: The Emerging Competition in Local Transport.” Raymond James & Associates, St. Petersburg, FL (August).
Baumol, W. J., J. C. Panzar, and R. D. Willig. 1982.Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Baumol, W. J., and J. G. Sidak, 1994.Toward Competition in Local Telephony. Boston, Mass.: MIT Press.
Berg, S.V., and J. Tschirhart, 1988.Natural Monopoly Regulation: Principles and Practice. U.S.A.: Cambridge University Press.
Besanko, David, and David E. M. Sappington, 1986. “Designing Regulatory Policy with Limited Information.” InFundamental of Pure and Applied Economics, 20, New York: Harwood.
Bonbright, James C., Albert L. Danielson, and David R. Kamerschen. 1988.Principles of Public Utility Rates. Arlington, VA: Public Utility Reports, Inc.
Braeutigam, R. R. 1989. “Optimal Policies for Natural Monopolies.” InHandbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2., edited by R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Braeutigam, R. R., and J. C. Panzar, 1989. “Diversification Incentives under ”Price-Based” and “Cost-Based” Regulation.”RAND Journal of Economics 20 (Autumn): 373–391.
Brennan, T. J. 1990. “Cross-Subsidization and Cost Misallocation by Regulated Monopolists.”Journal of Regulatory Economics 2 (March): 37–52.
Cabe, R. 1990. “Network Differentiation and the Prospect for Competition in Local Telecommunications.” Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, 1–12.
Calhoun, G. 1992.Wireless Access and the Local Telephone Network. Norwood, MA: Artech House.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and T. Sueyoshi. 1988. “A Goal Programming/Constrained Regression Review of The Bell System Breakup.”Management Science 34: 1–26.
Copeland, Basil L., and Alan Severn. 1985. “Price Theory and Telecommunications Regulation: A Dissenting View.”Yale Journal on Regulation 3: 53–69.
Christensen, L. R., D. C. Cummings, and P. E. Schoech. 1983. “Econometric Estimation of Scale Economies in Telecommunications.” InEconomic Analysis of Telecommunications: Theory and Applications, edited by L. Courville, A. de Fontenay, and R. Dobell. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Cramer, C. A. 1994. “ Local Competition for Telephone Services.”Review of Industrial Organization 9(3): 271–291.
Crew, Michael, and Paul Kleindorfer. 1986.The Economics of Public Utility Regulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Egan, Bruce L., 1994. “Economics of Wireless Communications Systems in the National Information Infrastructure (NII).” Report to the U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment (September): 1–66.
Evans, D. S., and J. J. Heckman. 1983. “Multiproduct Cost Function Estimates and Natural Monopoly Tests for the Bell System.” InBreaking Up Bell, edited by D. S. Evans, Amsterdam: North Holland.
Faulhaber, G. R. 1975. “Cross-Subsidization: Pricing in Public Enterprises.”American Economic Review 65: 966–77.
Faulhaber, G. R., and S. B. Levinson, 1981.” Subsidy-Free Prices and Anonymous Equity.”American Economic Review 71: 1083–91.
Freund, J. E. 1962.Mathematical Statistics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Gabel, D., and M. Kennet. 1991. “Estimating the Cost Structure of the Local Telephone Exchange Network.” National Regulatory Research Institute, NRRI 91–16, 1–149.
Gabszewicz, J. J., A. Shaked, J. Sutton, and J. F. Thisse, 1986. “Segmenting the Market: The Monopolist's Optimal Product Mix.”Journal of Economic Theory 39: 273–89.
Greenwald, B. C., and W. W. Sharkey, 1989. “The Economics of Deregulation of Local Exchange Telecommunications.”Journal of Regulatory Economics 1: 319–339.
Gross, Donaldson, Lufkin, and Jennette. 1992.Local Telephone Competition, Report No. 1226863 (May 18).
Huber, P. W. 1993. “Telephones, Competition, and the Candice-Coated Monopoly.”Cato Review of Business & Government Regulation 2: 34–43.
Huber, P. W., M. K. Kellogg, and J. Thorne, 1992.The Geodesic Network II:1993 Report on Competition in the Telephone Industry. Washington, D. C.: The Geodesic Company.
Jamison, Mark A. 1994. “Sustainable Prices and Cross-Subsidization in Monopolies.” Working paper, Sprint Communications, Kansas City, (March).
Johnson, Leland L., 1994.Toward Competition in Cable Television. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kahn, A. E., and W. B. Shew, 1987. “Current Issues in Telecommunications Regulation: Pricing.”Yale Journal on Regulation 4: 191–256.
Kahn, A. E., and W. E. Taylor, 1994. “The Pricing of Inputs Sold to Competitors: A Comment.”Yale Journal on Regulation 11 (no. 1, Winter): 225–240.
Karpinski, Richard, 1994. “What's Next for Cable...POTS and Beyond,”Telephony 25 (July): 24–27.
Kinzler, Frederick W., L. Keta Ruiz, and Glenn A. Woroch. 1992. “Deployment of Urban Fiber Rings by CAPs and LECs.” Working paper, GTE Laboratories, Waltham, MA, (August).
Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Jean Tirole, 1993.A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Mirman, L. J., Y. Tauman, and I. Zang, 1985. “Supportability, Sustainability, and Subsidy Free Prices.”RAND Journal of Economics 16: 114–26.
Mitchell, B. M., and I. Vogelsang, 1991.Telecommunications Pricing: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Panzar, J. C. 1980. “Sustainability, Efficiency, and Vertical Integration.” InRegulated Industries and Public Enterprise, edited by B. Mitchell, and P. R. Kleindorfer, Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
Panzar, John C., and Steven S. Wildman, 1993. “Competition in the Local Exchange: Appropriate Policies to Maintain Universal Service in Rural Areas.” Northwestern University, (September).
Panzar, J. C., and R. D. Willig, 1977. “Free Entry and the Sustainability of Natural Monopoly.”Bell Journal of Economics 8 (1): 1–22.
Parsons, Steve G. 1994. “Seven Years after Kahn and Shew: Lingering Myths on Costs and Pricing Telephone Service.”Yale Journal on Regulation 11 (Winter): 149–170.
Riordan, Michael H. 1992. “Regulation and Preemptive Technology Adoption.”RAND Journal of Economics 23 (no. 3, Autumn): 334–349.
Roeller, L. H. 1990. “Proper Quadratic Cost Functions with an Application to the Bell System.”Review of Economics and Statistics 72: 202–210.
Sidak, J. Gregory, 1993. “Telecommunications in Jerico: A Review Essay.”California Law Review 81: 1209–1239.
Shaked, A., and J. Sutton, 1982. “Natural Oligopolies.”Econometrica 51: 1469–84.
Sharkey, W. W. 1982.The Theory of Natural Monopoly. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sherman, Roger, 1989.The Regulation of Monopoly. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shin, R. T., and J. S. Ying, 1992. “Unnatural Monopolies in Local Telephone.”RAND Journal of Economics 23(2): 171–183.
Spulber, D. F. 1989.Regulation and Markets. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Spulber, D.F. 1989. “The Second Best Core.”International Economic Review 30: 623–31.
Sutton, J. 1986. “Vertical Product Differentiation: Some Basic Themes.”American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 76: 393–8.
Tschirhart, J. 1989. “Partial Regulation of Natural Monopoly.”In Political Economy of Government Regulation, edited by Jason Shogren, Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Press.
Waterson, Michael 1988.Regulation of the Firm and Natural Monopoly. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Woroch, Glenn A. 1991. “Technology, Regulation, and the Emergence of Competitive Access Providers.” (October), presented at 19th Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Solomon, MD, 1991.
Zajac, E. E. 1972. “ Some Preliminary Thoughts on Subsidization.” Proceedings of a Conference on Communication Policy Research, Washington, D.C.