A knowledge filter model for observing and facilitating change in teachers’ beliefs
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Barone, T. (2000). Aesthetics, politics and educational inquiry: Essays and examples. New York: Peter Lang.
Boston, K. (1999). Modern times and Australian curriculum [Web document]. Paper presented at the Curriculum Corporation 6th National Conference 1999. Retrieved March 13, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.curriculum.edu.au/mceetyalnationalgoals
Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teacher’s beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 49–58.
Briscoe, C., & Wells, B. (2002). Reforming primary science assessment practices: A case study of one teacher’s professional development through action research. Science Education, 86(3), 417–435.
Cranton, P. (2002). Teaching for transformation. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 93, 63–71.
Cranton, P., & King, K. P. (2003). Transformative learning as a professional development goal. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 98, 31–37.
Cho, J. (1998). Rethinking curriculum implementation: Paradigms, models and teachers’ work. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 421 767).
Cooper, P., & McIntyre, D. (1996). Effective teaching and learning. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (1994). Cognitive coaching; A foundation for renaissance schools. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Cuban, L. (1992). Curriculum stability and change. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 216–247). New York: Macmillan.
Czerniak, C. M., Weber, W. B. Jr., Sandmann, A., & Ahern, J. (1999). A literature review of science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 421–430.
Department of Education, Queensland. (1982). Primary science sourcebook: Activities for teaching science in Year 3. Brisbane, Australia: Author.
Department of Education, Queensland. (1983). Primary science sourcebook: Activities for teaching science in Year 7. Brisbane, Australia: Author.
Donnelly, J. F. (2000). Secondary science teaching under the national curriculum. School Science Review, 81(296), 27–35.
Eggers, J. H., & Clark, D. (2000). Executive coaching that wins. Ivey Business Journal, 65(1), 66–70.
Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye. New York: Macmillan.
Eisner, E. W., & Flinders, D. J. (1994). Responses to our critics. Research in the Teaching of English, 28(4), 382–390.
Feldman, A. (2000). Decision making in the practical domain: A model of practical conceptual change. Science Education, 84(5), 606–623.
Fetters, M., Czerniak, C. M., Fish, L., & Shawberry, J. (2002). Confronting, challenging, and changing teachers’ beliefs: Implications from a local systemic change professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(2), 101–130.
Fischer, J. C. (2001). Action research rationale and planning: Developing a framework for teacher inquiry. In G. Burnaford, J. Fischer, & D. Hobson (Eds.), Teachers doing research; The power of action through inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 29–48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Flinders, D. J., & Eisner, E. W. (1994). Educational criticism as a form of qualitative inquiry. Research in the Teaching of English, 28(4), 341–361.
Fullan, M. (2000). The three stories of education reform. Phi Delta Kappen, 81(8), 581–584.
Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–946.
Ginns, I. S., Heirdsfield, A., Atweh, B., & Watters, J. J. (2001). Beginning teachers becoming professionals through action research. Educational Action Research, 9, 111–133.
Goldston, J. M., & Shroyer, G. M. (2000). Teachers as researchers: Promoting effective science and mathematics teaching. Teaching and Change, 7(4), 327–346.
Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools (DETYA No. 6623DRED00A). Canberra, ACT, Australia: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA).
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gustafson, B., Guilbert, S., & MacDonald, D. (2002). Beginning elementary science teachers: Developing professional knowledge during a limited mentoring experience. Research in Science Education, 32, 281–302.
Hargreaves, A., & Moore, S. (2000). Curriculum integration and classroom relevance: A study of teachers’ practice. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 15(2), 89–112.
Harris, A. (2003). Behind the classroom door: The challenge of organisational and pedagogical change. Journal of Educational Change, 4(4), 369–382.
Jenkins, E. W. (2000). The impact of the national curriculum on secondary school science teaching in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 325–336.
Kemp, D. (1999). Outcomes reporting and accountable schooling. Paper presented at the Curriculum Corporation 6th National Conference, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Keys, P. M. (2000). Developing a good science syllabus for an optimistic future: A classroom teacher’s perspective. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Keys, P. M. (2003a). Primary and secondary teachers shaping the science curriculum: The influence of teacher knowledge. Unpublished Dissertation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Keys, P. M. (2003b). Teachers bending the science curriculum. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
Keys, P. M. (2003c). The science curriculum running the gauntlet of teacher beliefs. Paper presented at the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Keys, P. M. (2004). Are teachers walking the walk or just talking the talk in science education? Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Keys, P. M. (2005). Are teachers walking the walk or just talking the talk in science education? Teachers and teaching: Theory and practice, 11(5), 499–516.
Keys, P. M., & Watters, J. J. (2006). Transforming pre-service teacher knowledge in science education through multimedia and ICT. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco.
Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (1997). The nature of science: Naturally? School Science and Mathematics, 97(1), 1–2.
Lewin, K. (1952). Field theory in social science. London: Tavistock.
Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 275–292.
Lunn, S., & Solomon, J. (2000). Primary teachers’ thinking about the English national curriculum for science: Autobiographies, warrants and autonomy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1043–1056.
Mezirow, J., et al. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ministerial Council on Education Employment Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (1999). The Adelaide declaration on national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century [Web document]. Author. Retrieved March 13, 2000, from the World Wide Web:http://www.curriculum. edu.au/mceetyaladeldec.htm
Morine-Dershirmer, U., & Kent, T. (1999). The complex nature and sources of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. O. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 21–50). London: Kluwer Academic.
Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 877–904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Peers, C. E., Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2003). Supports and concerns for teacher professional growth during the implementation of a science curriculum. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 89–110.
QSR International Pty Ltd. (1999). Nvivo qualitative data analysis program (Version 1.2). Melbourne, Vic, Australia: Author.
Queensland School Curriculum Council. (1999). Science syllabus years 1 to 10. Brisbane, Australia: Publishing Services, Education Queensland.
Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 905–947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Rinehart, R. (1998). Fictional methods in ethnography: Believability, specks, of glass and Chekhov. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(2), 200–224.
Schwahn, C., & Spady, W. (1998). Why change doesn’t happen and how to make sure it does. Educational Leadership, 55(7), 45–47.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21.
Shulman, L. S. (1994). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 3–49). New York: Macmillan.
Senior, B. (1997). Organisational change. London: Prentice Hall.
Singleton, L. R. (1997). Out of the laboratory: Teaching about the history and nature of science and technology. The Social Studies, 88(3), 127–133.
Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 402–433). New York: Macmillan.
Tippins, D., Tobin, K., & Nichols, S. (1995). A constructivist approach to change in elementary science teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 25(2), 135–149.
van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.
van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., vanWerven, H. I., & Dekkers, H. (1997). Teachers’ craft knowledge. Higher Education, 34(1), 105–122.
Varrella, G. (2000). Science teachers at the top of their game: What is teacher expertise? The Clearing House, 74(1), 43–45.
Walls, R. T., Nardi, A. H., von Minden, A. M., & Hoffman, N. (2002). The characteristics of effective and ineffective teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(1), 39–48.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Yager, R. E. (1999). Scope, sequence and coordination: The Iowa project, a national reform effort in the USA. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 169–194.
Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zeus, P., & Skiffington, S. (2002). The coaching at work toolkit. Sydney, NSW, Australia: McGraw-Hill Australia.