A democratic preference aggregation model

Ismat Beg1, Tabasam Rashid2,3
1Centre for Mathematics and Statistical Sciences, Lahore School of Economics, Lahore, Pakistan
2Department of Science and Humanities, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
3University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arrow KJ: Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley; 1963.

Sen A: Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden Day; 1970.

Condorcet MJAN: de Marquis: Essai sur l’Application de l’Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendues à la Pluralità des Voix. l’Imprimerie Royale, Paris. 1785.

Dietrich F: A generalized model of judgment aggregation. Soc. Choice Welf 2007,28(4):529–565. 10.1007/s00355-006-0187-y

Beg I, Butt: (Im)possibility theorems in fuzzy framework. Critical Review: A Publication of Society for Mathematics of Uncertainty 2010,IV(2010):1–11.

Beg I, Butt N: Belief merging and judgement aggregation in fuzzy setting. Adv. Fuzzy Syst 2012, 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/635043

Beg I, Khalid A: Belief aggregation in fuzzy framework. J. Fuzzy Math 2012,20(4):911–924.

Duddy C, Piggins A: Many-valued judgment aggregation, characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary for an important class of agendas. Galway: School of Economics, National University of Ireland; 2009.

Dietrich F: Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems. J. Econ. Theory 2006,126(1):286–298. 10.1016/j.jet.2004.10.002

Bellman RE, Zadeh LA: Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Manage. Sci 1970,17(4):141–164.

Li X: Credibilistic Programming. Heidelberg: Springer; 2013.

Li X, Liu B: Foundation of credibilistic logic. Fuzzy Optimization Decis. Mak 2009,8(1):91–102.

Li X, Wang HS: Credibilistic satisfiability and credibilistic entailment. J. Multiple-Valued Logic Soft Comput 2010,16(1–2):105–134.

Nguyen HT, Walker E: A First Course in Fuzzy Logic. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2006.

Beg I, Rashid T: A generalized model of judgment and preference aggregation. Fuzzy Econ. Rev. (2013), in press

List C: Group knowledge and group rationality: a judgment aggregation perspective. Episteme 2005,2(1):25–38. 10.3366/epi.2005.2.1.25

Claussen CA, Roisland O: Collective economic decisions and the discursive paradox. Norges Bank Working Paper. Norges Bank, Oslo 2005.

Hathaway RJ, Bezdek JC, Pedrycz W: A parametric model for fusing heterogeneous fuzzy data. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst 1996,4(3):270–281. 10.1109/91.531770

Yang MS, Hwang PY, Chen DH: Fuzzy clustering algorithms for mixed feature variables. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2004, 141: 301–317. 10.1016/S0165-0114(03)00072-1

Yang MS, Ko CH: On a class of fuzzy c-numbers clustering procedures for fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1996, 84: 49–60. 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00308-8

Hung WL, Yang MS, Lee ES: Cell formation using fuzzy relational clustering algorithm. Math. Comput. Model 2011, 53: 1776–1787. 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.12.056

Dietrich F, List C: Strategy-proof judgment aggregation. Econ. Philos 2007,23(3):269–300.

van Hees M: The limits of epistemic democracy. Soc. Choice Welf 2007,28(4):649–666. 10.1007/s00355-006-0185-0

Pigozzi G: Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation. Synthese 2006,152(2):285–298. 10.1007/s11229-006-9063-7