A comparative assessment ofSNPand microsatellite markers for assigning parentage in a socially monogamous bird

Molecular Ecology Resources - Tập 17 Số 2 - Trang 183-193 - 2017
Sara A. Kaiser1,2, Scott A. Taylor3,4, Nancy Chen5,4, T. Scott Sillett2, Eliana R. Bondra5, Michael S. Webster1
1Macaulay Library, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 159 Sapsucker Woods Rd, Ithaca, NY, 14850 USA
2Migratory Bird Center, Center for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, MRC 5503, Washington, DC, 20013 USA
3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1900 Pleasant Street, 334 UCB, Boulder, CO, 80309 USA
4Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 159 Sapsucker Woods Rd, Ithaca, NY, 14850 USA
5Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, E145 Corson Hall, 215 Tower Road, Ithaca, NY, 14853 USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractSingle‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are preferred over microsatellite markers in many evolutionary studies, but have only recently been applied to studies of parentage. Evaluations ofSNPs and microsatellites for assigning parentage have mostly focused on special cases that require a relatively large number of heterozygous loci, such as species with low genetic diversity or with complex social structures. We developed 120SNPmarkers from a transcriptome assembled usingRNA‐sequencing of a songbird with the most common avian mating system—social monogamy. We compared the effectiveness of 97 novelSNPs and six previously described microsatellites for assigning paternity in the black‐throated blue warbler,Setophaga caerulescens. We show that the full panel of 97SNPs (meanHo = 0.19) was as powerful for assigning paternity as the panel of multiallelic microsatellites (meanHo = 0.86). Paternity assignments using the two marker types were in agreement for 92% of the offspring. Filtering individual samples by a 50% call rate andSNPs by a 75% call rate maximized the number of offspring assigned with 95% confidence usingSNPs. We also found that the 40 most heterozygousSNPs (meanHo = 0.37) had similar power to assign paternity as the full panel of 97SNPs. These findings demonstrate that a relatively small number of variableSNPs can be effective for parentage analyses in a socially monogamous species. We suggest that the development ofSNPmarkers is advantageous for studies that require high‐throughput genotyping or that plan to address a range of ecological and evolutionary questions.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2144/000113084

10.1534/genetics.105.048074

10.1007/978-1-4615-2381-9

10.1146/annurev.genet.36.030602.090831

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03551.x

10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00018-1

10.1186/1471-2105-10-421

10.1534/genetics.114.169052

10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.105312.x

10.1098/rspb.2005.3458

10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01673.x

10.1525/cond.2011.100233

10.1038/nrg3012

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02914.x

10.1186/1471-2164-14-176

10.1038/ng.806

10.1186/s12864-015-2252-3

10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02139-9

10.1038/nrg1348

10.1016/j.tree.2009.12.004

10.1590/S1415-47572013000200008

10.1002/9780470979365

10.1002/0471142905.hg0212s60

10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02891.x

10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01790.x

Gowaty PA, 1996, Partnership in Birds: The Study of Monogamy, 21, 10.1093/oso/9780198548614.003.0002

10.1038/nbt.1883

10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01613.x

10.1525/auk.2009.07159

10.1038/nprot.2013.084

10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02961.x

10.1007/s00335-001-2146-3

10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02943.x

10.1111/1755-0998.12283

10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00685.x

10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.021

10.2173/bna.087

10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.075

10.1098/rspb.2014.2523

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x

Kess T, 2016, Low‐cost ddRAD method of SNP discovery and genotyping applied to the periwinkle Littorina saxatilis, Journal of Molluscan Studies, 82, 104

10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:8<1676::AID-ELPS1676>3.0.CO;2-D

10.1002/ece3.1600

10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324

10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.11.001

10.1093/nar/gks540

10.1038/nmeth.1419

10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x

10.1038/86864

10.1111/mec.13140

10.1093/genetics/160.1.357

10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00683.x

10.1534/genetics.104.031039

10.1038/nrg2986

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01606.x

10.1101/gr.157801

10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.09.022

10.1016/B978-0-12-380896-7.00001-0

10.1007/s004120000089

10.1111/1755-0998.12155

10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03243.x

10.1111/mec.12242

Smit AFA, 2015, RepeatMasker Open‐4.0

10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03417.x

10.1111/jbg.12179

10.1642/AUK-15-51.1

10.1038/hdy.2009.73

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03772.x

10.1186/1297-9686-34-3-275

10.1016/j.chnaes.2013.03.006

10.1093/beheco/12.4.439

10.1111/1755-0998.12330

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132439

Westneat DF, 1990, The ecology and evolution of extra‐pair copulations in birds, Current Ornithology, 7, 331

White PS, 1992, Molecular Genetic Analysis of Populations: A Practical Approach, 50