A common reference-based indirect comparison meta-analysis of intravenous valproate versus intravenous phenobarbitone for convulsive status epilepticus

Epileptic Disorders - Tập 15 - Trang 314-323 - 2013
Francesco Brigo1,2, Stanley C. Igwe3, Raffaele Nardone1,4, Frediano Tezzon1, Luigi Giuseppe Bongiovanni2, Eugen Trinka4
1Department of Neurology, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Merano, Italy
2Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences, Section of Clinical Neurology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
3Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki-Ebonyi State, Nigeria
4Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria

Tóm tắt

To compare intravenous valproate (IV-VPA) with intravenous phenobarbitone (IV-PB) in the treatment of established generalised convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE). Efficacy and safety were estimated using a common-reference based indirect comparison metaanalysis (CRBMA) methodology. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of IV-VPA or IV-PB versus intravenous phenytoin (IV-PHT) for GCSE were identified by a systematic search of the literature. A random effects model was used to estimate Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) for efficacy and safety of IV-VPA or IV-PB versus IV-PHT in a standard meta-analysis. Adjusted indirect comparisons were then made between VPA and PB using the obtained results. CRBMA showed that VPA does not lead to significantly higher seizure cessation (OR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.36–2.76) compared to PB, although it exhibits fewer adverse effects (OR 0.17; 95% CI: 0.04–0.71). Results of this CRBMA are consistent with results of a recently published head-to-head comparison of IV-VPA and IV-PB. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate superiority of IV-VPA over IV-PB for the treatment of GCSE in terms of efficacy. Somedirect and indirect comparisons suggest that VPA has a better safety profile than PB. However, the limited numbers of underpowered RCTs included in this meta-analysis are not sufficient to justify a change in clinical practice. More rigorous and appropriately powered RCTs are therefore required to definitively determine the efficacy and tolerability of VPA for the treatment of GCSE.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alldredge BK, Gelb AM, Isaacs SM, et al. A comparison of lorazepam, diazepam, and placebo for the treatment of out of-hospital status epilepticus. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 631–637. Berg AT, Shinnar S, Levy SR, Testa FM. Status epilepticus in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Ann Neurol 1999; 45: 618–623. Berg AT, Shinnar S, Testa FM, et al. Status epilepticus after the initial diagnosis of epilepsy in children. Neurology 2004; 63: 1027–1034. Brigo F. New anti-epileptic drugs: overcoming the limits of randomised controlled trials. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2011; 9: 440–443. Brigo F, Storti M, Del Felice A, Fiaschi A, Bongiovanni LG. IV Valproate in generalized convulsive status epilepticus: a systematic review. Eur J Neurol 2012; 19: 1180–1191. Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, Walter SD. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis or randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 683–691. Cascino GD. Generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 1996; 71: 787–792. Deeks JJ. Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes. StatMed 2002; 21: 1575–1600. DeLorenzo RJ, Pellock JM, Towne AR, Boggs JG. Epidemiology of status epilepticus. J Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 12: 316–325. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177–188. Emerson JD. Combining estimates of the odds ratio: the state of the art. Stat Methods Med Res 1994; 3: 157–178. Gilad R, Izkovitz N, Dabby R, et al. Treatment of status epilepticus and acuterepetitive seizures with i.v. valproic acid vs phenytoin. Acta Neurol Scand 2008; 118: 296–300. Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, et al. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9: 1–134, iii–iv. Guyatt G, Jaeschke R, Heddle N, Cook D, Shannon H, Walter S. Basic statistics for clinicians: 1. Hypothesis testing. CMAJ 1995; 152: 27–32. Higgins JPT, Green S. Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557–560. ICWG. Report of the Indirect Comparisons Working Group to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee: assessing indirect comparisons. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Aging. 2009); available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/B11E8EF19B358E39CA25754B000A9C07/$File/ICWG%20Report%20FINAL2.pdf Lowenstein DH, Bleck T, Macdonald RL. It’s time to revise the definition of status epilepticus. Epilepsia 1999; 40: 120–122. Malamiri RA, Ghaempanah M, Khosroshahi N, Nikkhah A, Bavarian B, Ashrafi MR. Efficacy and safety of intravenous sodium valproate versus phenobarbital in controlling convulsive status epilepticus and acute prolonged convulsive seizures in children: a randomised trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2012; 16: 536–541. Misra UK, Kalita J, Patel R. Sodium valproate vs phenytoin in status epilepticus: a pilot study. Neurology 2006; 67: 340–342. Otoul C, Arrigo C, van Rijckevorsel K, French JA. Metaanalysis and indirect comparisons of levetiracetam with other second-generation antiepileptic drugs in partial epilepsy. Clin Neuropharmacol 2005; 28: 72–78. Prasad K, Al-Roomi K, Krishnan PR, Sequeira R. Anticonvulsant therapy for status epilepticus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 19: CD003723. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003723.pub2. Robinson KA, Dickersin K. Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31: 150–153. Shinnar S, Berg AT, Moshe SL, Shinnar R. How long do new-onset seizures in children last? Ann Neurol 2001; 49: 659–664. Silbergleit R, Durkalski V, Lowenstein D, et al. Intramuscular versus intravenous therapy for prehospital status epilepticus. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 591–600. Song F, Altman DG, Glenny AM, Deeks JJ. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 326: 472–475. Song F, Loke YK, Walsh T, Glenny AM, Eastwood AJ, Altman DG. Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews. BMJ 2009; 338: b1147. Treiman DM, Meyers PD, Walton NY, et al. A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Veterans Affairs Status Epilepticus Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 792–798. Tudur Smith C, Marson AG, Chadwick DW, Williamson PR. Multiple treatment comparisons in epilepsy monotherapy trials. Trials 2007; 8: 34.