A blueprint for securing Brazil's marine biodiversity and supporting the achievement of global conservation goals

Diversity and Distributions - Tập 27 Số 2 - Trang 198-215 - 2021
Rafael A. Magris1, Micheli Duarte de Paula Costa2,3, Carlos E. L. Ferreira4, Ciro C. Vilar5, Jean‐Christophe Joyeux5, Joel C. Creed6, Margareth Copertino7, Paulo Antunes Horta8, Paulo Yukio Gomes Sumida9, Ronaldo B. Francini‐Filho10, Sergio R. Floeter11
1Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation, Ministry of Environment, Brasilia, Brazil
2School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
3School of Life and Environmental Sciences Centre for Integrative Ecology Deakin University Melbourne Vic. Australia
4Reef Systems Ecology and Conservation Lab, Departamento de Biologia Marinha, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
5Departamento de Oceanografia e Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
6Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
7Lab. Ecologia Vegetal Costeira Instituto de Oceanografia Universidade Federal do Rio Grande – FURG Rio Grande Brazil
8Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil
9Instituto Oceanográfico da Universidade de São Paulo, Praça do Oceanográfico, São Paulo, Brazil
10Centro de Biologia Marinha (CEBIMar) Universidade de São Paulo São Sebastião Brasil
11Marine Macroecology and Biogeography Laboratory Department of Ecology and Zoology Federal University of Santa Catarina Florianópolis Brazil

Tóm tắt

AbstractAimAs a step towards providing support for an ecological approach to strengthening marine protected areas (MPAs) and meeting international commitments, this study combines cumulative impact assessment and conservation planning approach to undertake a large‐scale spatial prioritization.LocationExclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Brazil, Southwest Atlantic Ocean.MethodsWe developed a prioritization approach to protecting different habitat types, threatened species ranges and ecological connectivity, while also mitigating the impacts of multiple threats on biodiversity. When identifying priorities for conservation, we accounted for the co‐occurrence of 24 human threats and the distribution of 161 marine habitats and 143 threatened species, as well as their associated vulnerabilities. Additionally, we compared our conservation priorities with MPAs proposed by local stakeholders.ResultsWe show that impacts to habitats and species are widespread and identify hot spots of cumulative impacts on inshore and offshore areas. Industrial fisheries, climate change and land‐based activities were the most severe threats to biodiversity. The highest priorities were mostly found towards the coast due to the high cumulative impacts found in nearshore areas. As expected, our systematic approach showed a better performance on selecting priority sites when compared to the MPAs proposed by local stakeholders without a typical conservation planning exercise, increasing the existing coverage of MPAs by only 7.9%. However, we found that proposed MPAs still provide some opportunities to protect areas facing high levels of threats.Main conclusionsThe study presents a blueprint of how to embrace a comprehensive ecological approach when identifying strategic priorities for conservation. We advocate protecting these crucial areas from degradation in emerging conservation efforts is key to maintain their biodiversity value.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.026

10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.027

10.1371/journal.pone.0035171

10.1371/journal.pone.0198452

10.1007/s10531-017-1316-x

10.1126/science.aau1397

10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.005

10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00123.x

10.1016/j.marpol.2016.02.010

10.1111/ddi.12159

10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.012

10.1590/S1679-875920161036064sp2

Crain C. M., 2009, Understanding and managing human threats to the coastal marine, Environment, 62, 39

10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.043

10.1111/2041-210X.13349

10.1038/s41559-016-0040

10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.016

10.1002/aqc.2445

10.1093/biosci/biv064

10.1002/eap.1744

Duarte G. A. S., 2020, Heat waves are a major threat to turbid coral reefs, Brazil, 7, 1

10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.07.005

10.1073/pnas.0906473107

10.1890/ES13-00336.1

10.1038/s41598-017-08850-w

10.1111/acv.12178

10.1016/j.marpol.2018.07.017

10.1038/nature21708

10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.08.013

10.1111/gcb.14956

10.1111/brv.12155

10.1038/s41598-019-47201-9

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00752.x

10.1126/science.1149345

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139024

Hanson J., 2017, prioritizr: Systematic Conservation Prioritization in R. R package.(version 4.0. 2. ed)

10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.005

10.1016/j.oneear.2020.01.010

Kesner‐Reyes K., 2016, AquaMaps: Algorithm and datasources for aquatic organisms

10.1111/conl.12005

10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.06.036

10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.09.010

10.1111/cobi.13340

10.1111/brv.12008

10.1002/aqc.2783

Leão Z. M., 2019, World seas: An environmental evaluation: Volume I: Europe, the Americas and West Africa, 813

10.3354/meps08029

10.1126/science.aad5443

10.1111/conl.12439

10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110961

10.3390/d10020026

10.1371/journal.pone.0140828

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.238

10.1126/science.aat6215

10.1111/ecog.01507

10.1002/aqc.3169

10.1038/35012251

10.1371/journal.pone.0104489

10.1371/journal.pone.0079889

10.1126/sciadv.1501252

10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.05.003

10.1590/1413-812320172210.17742017

10.1126/science.1246752

10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-010916

10.1007/0-387-22648-6_17

10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00424-X

R Core Team, 2015, R: A language and environment for statistical computing

10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.004

10.1098/rstb.2013.0273

10.1126/science.aaq1614

10.1016/j.marpol.2018.02.004

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.005

10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.05.005

10.1641/B570707

10.4324/9781849776608

10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.10.002

10.1126/sciadv.aay9969

10.1890/140022

United Nations, 2015, Draft outcome document of the United Nations summit for the adoption of the post‐2015 development agenda 12 August 2015 A/69/L.85 (Vol. 56350)

10.1016/j.ecss.2017.06.022

10.1002/aqc.3269

Visconti P., 2020, Protected area targets post‐2020, Science, 364, 239, 10.1126/science.aav6886

10.1371/journal.pone.0182396

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01340.x

10.1111/gcb.15094