A Systematic Review of Multimodal Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Cognitive Function in Older People with Dementia in Nursing Homes

Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders - Tập 48 Số 1-2 - Trang 1-16 - 2019
Kyosuke Yorozuya1,2, Yuta Kubo3, Naoki Tomiyama3, Shingo Yamane1, Hideaki Hanaoka1
1Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
2Rehabilitation Unit, Hagijisei Hospital, Hagi, Japan
3Faculty of Care and Rehabilitation, Seijoh University, Tokai, Japan

Tóm tắt

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Multimodal non-pharmacological interventions (MNPIs) have been reported to be effective in improving the cognitive function. Therefore, it is necessary to study these interventions in older people with dementia (PWD) in nursing homes (NHs). <b><i>Aims:</i></b> This study aimed to investigate the effects, contents, frequency, duration, length, and form of MNPIs on the global and specific cognitive functions of PWD in NHs through a systematic review, and to consider what kind of intervention design is most effective. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature published between January 2008 and October 2018 was performed on the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CINAHL databases. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one non-RCTs were extracted from electronic databases, and a review was carried out. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our review suggests that MNPIs may improve the global, executive function and memory of PWD in NHs. The combination of exercise, cognitive training and activities of daily living, and intervention at least 3 times a week over at least 8 weeks with, at least 30 min per session using the integrated form is recommended for improving the global and specific cognitive functions of PWD in NHs.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1176/ajp.2007.164.6.910

10.1093/geront/gnr137

10.1037/0882-7974.5.1.3

10.1186/1471-2377-10-87

10.1111/jgs.14947

10.1111/j.1532-5415.2001.49266.x

10.1159/000167267

10.1159/000486546

10.1002/14651858

10.1371/journal.pmed.0040338

10.3122/jabfm.2012.03.100183

10.1192/bjp.bp.113.127811

10.1016/ S0140-6736(17)31363-6

10.1186/1741-7015-9-129

10.1017/S1041610211001001

10.1002/14651858

10.1159/000316119

10.1111/jocn.12166

10.1300/J018v15n04_04

10.1111/j.1547-5069.2006.00127.x

10.1186/s12991-016-0091-5

10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.01086.x

10.1007/s12603-012-0402-8

10.1159/000446508

10.2147/CIA.S54383

10.1111/ggi.13035

10.3233/JAD-160619

10.1111/ggi.12453

10.3389/fnhum.2012.00046

10.3389/fnagi.2014.00231

10.1001/jama.287.6.742

10.1177/1471301218795289

10.1016/j.archger.2017.07.017

10.1017/S1041610218001679

10.1002/gps.2205

10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04998.x

10.3928/02793695-20100930-01

10.1016/j.jamda.2013.11.022

10.1371/journal.pone.0097577

10.1016/j.jagp.2014.12.191

10.1186/s12877-017-0453-0

10.1136/bmj.b2700

10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007

10.1136/bmj.g7647

10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4

10.1159/000051263

10.1371/journal.pone.0181515

10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x

10.1136/bmj.318.7183.593

10.1159/000491818

10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03938.x

10.1007/s10072-016-2659-x