A “Scientific Diversity” Intervention to Reduce Gender Bias in a Sample of Life Scientists

CBE Life Sciences Education - Tập 15 Số 3 - Trang ar29 - 2016
Corinne A. Moss‐Racusin1, Jojanneke van der Toorn2, John F. Dovidio3, Victoria L. Brescoll4, Mark Graham5, Jo Handelsman6
1Department of Psychology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
2Department of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands
3Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520;
4School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
5Center for Teaching and Learning, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
6Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520

Tóm tắt

Mounting experimental evidence suggests that subtle gender biases favoring men contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), including many subfields of the life sciences. However, there are relatively few evaluations of diversity interventions designed to reduce gender biases within the STEM community. Because gender biases distort the meritocratic evaluation and advancement of students, interventions targeting instructors’ biases are particularly needed. We evaluated one such intervention, a workshop called “Scientific Diversity” that was consistent with an established framework guiding the development of diversity interventions designed to reduce biases and was administered to a sample of life science instructors (N = 126) at several sessions of the National Academies Summer Institute for Undergraduate Education held nationwide. Evidence emerged indicating the efficacy of the “Scientific Diversity” workshop, such that participants were more aware of gender bias, expressed less gender bias, and were more willing to engage in actions to reduce gender bias 2 weeks after participating in the intervention compared with 2 weeks before the intervention. Implications for diversity interventions aimed at reducing gender bias and broadening the participation of women in the life sciences are discussed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Al-Gazali L, 2013, Nature, 495, 35, 10.1038/495035a

Bargh JA, 2000, Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, 253

Bodenhausen GV, 1998, Stereotype Activation and Inhibition: Advances in Social Cognition, 1

Carnes M, 2015, Acad Med, 90, 221, 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000552

Carnes M, 2012, J Divers High Educ, 5, 63, 10.1037/a0028128

Case KA, 2007, Psychol Women Q, 31, 426, 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00391.x

Ceci SJ, 2014, Psychol Sci Pub Int, 15, 75, 10.1177/1529100614541236

10.1187/cbe.08-06-0029

10.1187/cbe.14-01-0002

Crowe E, 1997, Organ Behav Hum, 69, 117, 10.1006/obhd.1996.2675

Dasgupta D, 2011, Psychol Inq, 22, 231, 10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313

Dasgupta N, 2015, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 112, 4988, 10.1073/pnas.1422822112

Devine PG, 1989, J Pers Soc Psychol, 56, 5, 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5

Devine PG, 2012, J Exp Soc Psychol, 48, 1267, 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003

Dobbin F, 2013, The Oxford Handbook of Diversity and Work, 253, 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199736355.013.0015

Dobbin F, 2015, Am Sociol Rev, 80, 1014, 10.1177/0003122415596416

Does S, 2011, J Exp Soc Psychol, 47, 562, 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.024

Dovidio JF, 2004, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1

10.1187/cbe.13-10-0204

Finson KD, 1995, School Sci Math, 95, 195, 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15762.x

Glick P, 1996, J Pers Soc Psychol, 70, 491, 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

Greenwald AG, 2015, J Pers Soc Psychol, 108, 553, 10.1037/pspa0000016

Handelsman J, 2004, Science, 304, 521, 10.1126/science.1096022

Handelsman J, 2007, Scientific Teaching

Hawkins SA, 1990, Psychol Bull, 107, 311, 10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.311

Higgins ET, 1997, J Pers Soc Psychol, 72, 515, 10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515

Jackson SM, 2014, Soc Psychol Educ, 17, 419, 10.1007/s11218-014-9259-5

Kenny DA, 1986, Psychol Bull, 99, 422, 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.422

Kenny DA, 1996, Psychol Bull, 119, 138, 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.138

Lai CK, 2014, J Exp Psychol Gen, 143, 1765, 10.1037/a0036260

Lariviere V, 2013, Nature, 504, 211, 10.1038/504211a

Legault L, 2011, Psychol Sci, 22, 1472, 10.1177/0956797611427918

Milkman KL, 2015, J Appl Psychol, 100, 1678, 10.1037/apl0000022

Miller S, 2008, Science, 322, 1329, 10.1126/science.1166032

Moss-Racusin CA, 2012, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109, 16474, 10.1073/pnas.1211286109

Moss-Racusin CA, 2010, Psychol Women Quart, 34, 186, 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01561.x

Moss-Racusin CA, 2014, Science, 343, 615, 10.1126/science.1245936

Nature, 2015, Nature, 522, 255

Nosek BA, 2002, Group Dyn Theor Res, 6, 101, 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101

Paluck EL, 2006, J Soc Issues, 62, 577, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00474.x

Paluck EL, 2009, Annu Rev Psychol, 60, 339, 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607

Pfund C, 2009, Science, 324, 470, 10.1126/science.1170015

10.1187/cbe.14-10-0184

Prime J, 2012, Calling All White Men: Can Training Help Create Inclusive Workplaces

Purdie-Vaughns V, 2008, J Pers Soc Psychol, 94, 615, 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615

Reuben E, 2014, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 111, 4403, 10.1073/pnas.1314788111

Rudman LA, 2012, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 167

Sheltzer JM, 2014, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 111, 10107, 10.1073/pnas.1403334111

Shields SA, 2011, J Divers High Educ, 4, 120, 10.1037/a0022953

Steele CM, 1995, J Pers Soc Psychol, 69, 797, 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797

Steinpreis RE, 1999, Sex Roles, 41, 509, 10.1023/A:1018839203698

Stout JG, 2011, J Pers Soc Psychol, 100, 255, 10.1037/a0021385

Swim JK, 1995, J Pers Soc Psychol, 68, 199, 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199

Swim JK, 2005, Psychol Women Q, 29, 406, 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00240.x

Trawalter S, 2006, J Exp Soc Psychol, 42, 406, 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.05.008

Uhlmann EL, 2007, Organ Behav Hum Dec, 104, 207, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.07.001

Van der Lee R, 2015, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 112, 12349, 10.1073/pnas.1510159112

10.1187/cbe.04-07-0057

Zawadzki MJ, 2012, Sex Roles, 67, 605, 10.1007/s11199-012-0181-z