A Potential Tool for Clinicians; Evaluating a Computer-Led Dietary Assessment Method in Overweight and Obese Women during Weight Loss

Nutrients - Tập 9 Số 3 - Trang 218
Adrianne Widaman1, Nancy L. Keim2,3, Dustin J. Burnett3, B.T. Miller3, Megan Witbracht4, Keith F. Widaman5, Kevin D. Laugero2,3
1Department of Nutrition, Food Science and Packaging, San José State University, San José, CA 95192, USA
2Nutritional Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
3United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Western Human Nutrition Research Center, Davis, CA 95616, USA
4Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
5Graduate School of Education, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA

Tóm tắt

Many Americans are attempting to lose weight with the help of healthcare professionals. Clinicians can improve weight loss results by using technology. Accurate dietary assessment is crucial to effective weight loss. The aim of this study was to validate a computer-led dietary assessment method in overweight/obese women. Known dietary intake was compared to Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall (ASA24) reported intake in women (n = 45), 19–50 years, with body mass index of 27–39.9 kg/m2. Participants received nutrition education and reduced body weight by 4%–10%. Participants completed one unannounced dietary recall and their responses were compared to actual intake. Accuracy of the recall and characteristics of respondent error were measured using linear and logistic regression. Energy was underreported by 5% with no difference for most nutrients except carbohydrates, vitamin B12, vitamin C, selenium, calcium and vitamin D (p = 0.002, p < 0.0001, p = 0.022, p = 0.010, p = 0.008 and p = 0.001 respectively). Overall, ASA24 is a valid dietary assessment tool in overweight/obese women participating in a weight loss program. The automated features eliminate the need for clinicians to be trained, to administer, or to analyze dietary intake. Computer-led dietary assessment tools should be considered as part of clinician-supervised weight loss programs.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Imes, 2014, The obesity epidemic: The United States as a cautionary tale for the rest of the world, Curr. Epidemiol. Rep., 1, 82, 10.1007/s40471-014-0012-6

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2012). Overweight and Obesity Statistics, Available online: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statistics/Pages/overweight-obesity-statistics.aspx.

Finkelstein, 2009, Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: Payer-and service-specific estimates, Health Aff., 28, w822, 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.w822

Gallup Personal Weight Situation. Available online: http://www.gallup.com/poll/7264/personal-weight-situation.aspx.

McCarthy, J. Fewer Americans Say They Want to Lose Weight. Available online: http://www.gallup.com/poll/186920/fewer-americans-say-lose-weight.aspx.

Coalition, O.A. Physician Supervised Weight Loss Programs. Available online: http://www.obesityaction.org/obesity-treatments/physician-supervised-programs.

Galuska, 1999, Are health care professionals advising obese patients to lose weight?, JAMA, 282, 1576, 10.1001/jama.282.16.1576

Levine, 2015, Technology-assisted weight loss interventions in primary care: A systematic review, J. Gen. Intern Med., 30, 107, 10.1007/s11606-014-2987-6

Rao, 2011, New and emerging weight management strategies for busy ambulatory settings: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association endorsed by the Society of Behavioral Medicine, Circulation, 124, 1182, 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31822b9543

Freedman, 2014, Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake, Am. J. Epidemiol., 180, 172, 10.1093/aje/kwu116

Archer, E., Hand, G.A., and Blair, S.N. (2013). Validity of U.S. nutritional surveillance: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey caloric energy intake data, 1971–2010. PLoS ONE, 8.

Johnson, 2002, Dietary intake—How do we measure what people are really eating?, Obes. Res., 10, 63S, 10.1038/oby.2002.192

Westerterp, 2002, Validity of the assessment of dietary intake: Problems of misreporting, Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care, 5, 489, 10.1097/00075197-200209000-00006

Heitmann, 1996, Obese individuals underestimate their food intake—Which food groups are under-reported?, Ugeskr. Laeger, 158, 6902

Poppitt, 1998, Assessment of selective under-reporting of food intake by both obese and non-obese women in a metabolic facility, Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord., 22, 303, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800584

Carroll, 2012, Taking advantage of the strengths of 2 different dietary assessment instruments to improve intake estimates for nutritional epidemiology, Am. J. Epidemiol., 175, 340, 10.1093/aje/kwr317

Schatzkin, 2003, A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-h recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: Results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study, Int. J. Epidemiol., 32, 1054, 10.1093/ije/dyg264

Subar, 2012, The Automated Self-Administered 24-h dietary recall (ASA24): A resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute, J. Acad. Nutr. Diet., 112, 1134, 10.1016/j.jand.2012.04.016

Thompson, 2015, Comparison of Interviewer-Administered and Automated Self-Administered 24-h Dietary Recalls in 3 Diverse Integrated Health Systems, Am. J. Epidemiol., 181, 970, 10.1093/aje/kwu467

Subar, 2007, Formative research of a quick list for an automated self-administered 24-h dietary recall, J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 107, 1002, 10.1016/j.jada.2007.03.007

Zimmerman, 2009, Challenges in converting an interviewer-administered food probe database to self-administration in the National Cancer Institute Automated Self-administered 24-h Recall (ASA24), J. Food Compost. Anal., 22, S48, 10.1016/j.jfca.2009.02.003

Subar, 2010, Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-h recall, J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 110, 55, 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.007

Kirkpatrick, 2014, Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-h Recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 100, 233, 10.3945/ajcn.114.083238

Burnett, D., Peerson, J., Miller, B., Welch, L., Witbract, M., Krishnan, S., and Keim, N. (2016, January 2–6). Dietary Adherence Monitoring Tool for Free-living, Controlled Feeding Studies. Proceedings of the Experimental Biology Annual Conference, San Diego, CA, USA.

Johnston, 2014, Agreement in participant-coded and investigator-coded food-record analysis in overweight research participants: An examination of interpretation bias, J. Acad. Nutr. Diet., 114, 796, 10.1016/j.jand.2013.08.024

Macdiarmid, 1998, Assessing dietary intake: Who, what and why of under-reporting, Nutr. Res. Rev., 11, 231, 10.1079/NRR19980017

Nelson, 1994, Food photography. I: The perception of food portion size from photographs, Br. J. Nutr., 72, 649, 10.1079/BJN19940069

Kirkpatrick, 2016, The Use of Digital Images in 24-h Recalls May Lead to Less Misestimation of Portion Size Compared with Traditional Interviewer-Administered Recalls, J. Nutr., 146, 2567, 10.3945/jn.116.237271

Conway, 2003, Effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture 5-step multiple-pass method in assessing food intake in obese and nonobese women, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 77, 1171, 10.1093/ajcn/77.5.1171

Japur, 2010, Food energy content influences food portion size estimation by nutrition students, J. Hum. Nutr. Diet., 23, 272, 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01042.x

Souverein, 2011, Uncertainty in intake due to portion size estimation in 24-h recalls varies between food groups, J. Nutr., 141, 1396, 10.3945/jn.111.139220

Baxter, 2009, Fourth-grade children’s dietary recall accuracy is influenced by retention interval (target period and interview time), J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 109, 846, 10.1016/j.jada.2009.02.015

Hwang, 2012, Primary care providers’ perspectives on online weight-loss programs: A big wish list, J. Med. Internet Res., 14, e16, 10.2196/jmir.1955

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Nutrients

Tập 9 Số 3

218

Thông tin tác giả