A Long-Term Engagement with a Social Robot for Autism Therapy

Frontiers in Robotics and AI - Tập 8
Nazerke Rakhymbayeva1, Aida Amirova2, Anara Sandygulova1
1Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan
2Graduate School of Education, Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan

Tóm tắt

Social robots are increasingly being used as a mediator between a therapist and a child in autism therapy studies. In this context, most behavioural interventions are typically short-term in nature. This paper describes a long-term study that was conducted with 11 children diagnosed with either Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) or ASD in co-occurrence with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). It uses a quantitative analysis based on behavioural measures, including engagement, valence, and eye gaze duration. Each child interacted with a robot on several occasions in which each therapy session was customized to a child’s reaction to robot behaviours. This paper presents a set of robot behaviours that were implemented with the goal to offer a variety of activities to be suitable for diverse forms of autism. Therefore, each child experienced an individualized robot-assisted therapy that was tailored according to the therapist’s knowledge and judgement. The statistical analyses showed that the proposed therapy managed to sustain children’s engagement. In addition, sessions containing familiar activities kept children more engaged compared to those sessions containing unfamiliar activities. The results of the interviews with parents and therapists are discussed in terms of therapy recommendations. The paper concludes with some reflections on the current study as well as suggestions for future studies.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrist, 2015, Look like Me: Matching Robot Personality via Gaze to Increase Motivation, 3603

Anzalone, 2019, Quantifying Patterns of Joint Attention during Human-Robot Interactions: An Application for Autism Spectrum Disorder Assessment, Pattern Recognition Lett., 118, 42, 10.1016/j.patrec.2018.03.007

Baraka, 2020, Chap. Human-Robot Interaction: Evaluation Methods and Their Standardization, An Extended Framework for Characterizing Social Robots, 21

Baxter, 2011, Long-term Human-Robot Interaction with Young Users

Baxter, 2016, From Characterising Three Years of Hri to Methodology and Reporting recommendations, 391

Belpaeme, 2020, Advice to New Human-Robot Interaction Researchers, Human-robot Interaction : Evaluation Methods and Their Standardization, 355, 10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_14

Bharatharaj, 2017, Robot-assisted Therapy for Learning and Social Interaction of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Robotics, 6, 4, 10.3390/robotics6010004

Cao, 2019, Interaction with Social Robots: Improving Gaze toward Face but Not Necessarily Joint Attention in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Front. Psychol., 10, 1503, 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01503

Castellano, 2009, Detecting User Engagement with a Robot Companion Using Task and Social Interaction-Based Features, ICMI-MLMI ’09, 119, 10.1145/1647314.1647336

Clabaugh, 2019, Long-term Personalization of an in-home Socially Assistive Robot for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders, Front. Robot. AI, 6, 110, 10.3389/frobt.2019.00110

Coninx, 2016, Towards Long-Term Social Child-Robot Interaction: Using Multi-Activity Switching to Engage Young Users, J. Human-Robot Interaction, 5, 32, 10.5898/JHRI.5.1.Coninx

Daley, 2013, Ethical Considerations in Conducting Research on Autism Spectrum Disorders in Low and Middle Income Countries, J. Autism Dev. Disord., 43, 2002, 10.1007/s10803-012-1750-2

David, 2019, Effects of a Robot-Enhanced Intervention for Children with Asd on Teaching Turn-Taking Skills, J. Educ. Comput. Res., 58, 10.1177/0735633119830344

De Korte, 2020, Self-initiations in Young Children with Autism during Pivotal Response Treatment with and without Robot Assistance, Autism, 24, 2117, 10.1177/1362361320935006

Diehl, 2012, The Clinical Use of Robots for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Critical Review, Res. autism Spectr. Disord., 6, 249, 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.05.006

François, 2009, A Long-Term Study of Children with Autism Playing with a Robotic Pet, Is, 10, 324, 10.1075/is.10.3.04fra

Huijnen, 2016, Matching Robot Kaspar to Autism Spectrum Disorder (Asd) Therapy and Educational Goals, Int. J. Soc. Robotics, 8, 445, 10.1007/s12369-016-0369-4

Huskens, 2014, Improving Collaborative Play between Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Their Siblings: The Effectiveness of a Robot-Mediated Intervention Based on Lego Therapy, J. Autism Dev. Disord., 45, 3746, 10.1007/s10803-014-2326-0

Kanda, 2007, A Two-Month Field Trial in an Elementary School for Long-Term Human-Robot Interaction, IEEE Trans. Robot., 23, 962, 10.1109/TRO.2007.904904

Kim, 2012, Bridging the Research gap: Making Hri Useful to Individuals with Autism, J. Human-Robot Interaction, 1, 10.5898/jhri.v1i1.25

Kumazaki, 2018, The Impact of Robotic Intervention on Joint Attention in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders, Mol. Autism, 9, 10.1186/s13229-018-0230-8

Leite, 2013, Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey, Int. J. Soc. Robotics, 5, 291, 10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y

Lord, 2012, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule

Melo, 2019, Project INSIDE: towards Autonomous Semi-unstructured Human-Robot Social Interaction in Autism Therapy, Artif. Intelligence Med., 96, 198, 10.1016/j.artmed.2018.12.003

Navarro, 2011, Real-world Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Humanoid Robot Charging in a home Environment, Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, 231, 10.1007/978-3-642-23232-9_21

Oertel, 2020, Engagement in Human-Agent Interaction: An Overview, Front. Robot. AI, 7, 92, 10.3389/frobt.2020.00092

Pakkar, 2019, Designing a Socially Assistive Robot for Long-Term in-home Use for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1

Ployhart, 2010, Longitudinal Research: The Theory, Design, and Analysis of Change, J. Management, 36, 94, 10.1177/0149206309352110

Robins, 2005, Robotic Assistants in Therapy and Education of Children with Autism: Can a Small Humanoid Robot Help Encourage Social Interaction Skills?, Universal Access Inf. Soc., 4, 105, 10.1007/s10209-005-0116-3

Robins, 2007, Eliciting Requirements for a Robotic Toy for Children with Autism - Results from User Panels, 101

Rudovic, 2017, Measuring Engagement in Robot-Assisted Autism Therapy: A Cross-Cultural Study, Front. Robot. AI, 4, 10.3389/frobt.2017.00036

Salam, 2016, Fully Automatic Analysis of Engagement and its Relationship to Personality in Human-Robot Interactions, IEEE Access, 14, 1, 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2614525

Sandygulova, 2019, Interaction Design and Methodology of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Children with Severe Asd and Adhd. Paladyn, J. Behav. Robotics, 10, 330, 10.1515/pjbr-2019-0027

Scassellati, 2018, Improving Social Skills in Children with Asd Using a Long-Term, in-home Social Robot, Sci. Robotics, 3, 10.1126/scirobotics.aat7544

Schadenberg, 2017, Personalising Game Difficulty to Keep Children Motivated to Play with a Social Robot: A Bayesian Approach, Cogn. Syst. Res., 43, 222, 10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.08.003

Sevin, 2015, A Review of Behavioral Strategies and Support Considerations for Assisting Persons with Difficulties Transitioning from Activity to Activity, Rev. J. Autism Developmental Disord., 2, 329, 10.1007/s40489-015-0056-7

Shibata, 2004, An Overview of Human Interactive Robots for Psychological Enrichment, Proc. IEEE, 92, 1749, 10.1109/JPROC.2004.835383

Srinivasan, 2016, The Effects of Embodied Rhythm and Robotic Interventions on the Spontaneous and Responsive Verbal Communication Skills of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (Asd): A Further Outcome of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial, Res. Autism Spectr. Disord., 27, 73, 10.1016/j.rasd.2016.04.001

Srinivasan, 2015, A Comparison of the Effects of Rhythm and Robotic Interventions on Repetitive Behaviors and Affective States of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (Asd), Res. autism Spectr. Disord., 18, 51, 10.1016/j.rasd.2015.07.004

Sung, 2009, Pimp My Roomba: Designing for Personalization, 193

Tozadore, 2016, Variation in a Humanoid Robot Behavior to Analyse Interaction Quality in Pedagogical Sessions with Children, 133

van Otterdijk, 2020, The Effects of Long-Term Child-Robot Interaction on the Attention and the Engagement of Children with Autism, Robotics, 9, 79, 10.3390/robotics9040079

Weitlauf, 2014, Therapies for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Behavioral Interventions Update

Wood, 2019, Developing Kaspar: A Humanoid Robot for Children with Autism, Int. J. Soc. Robotics, 10.1007/s12369-019-00563-6

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Frontiers in Robotics and AI

Tập 8

Thông tin tác giả