A Global Perspective of the Variables Associated with Acceptance of Evolution

Evolution: Education and Outreach - 2012
Benjamin C. Heddy1, Louis S. Nadelson2
1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract The controversy of biological evolution due to conflicts with personal beliefs and worldviews is a phenomenon that spans many cultures. Acceptance of evolution is essential for global advancement in science, technology, and agriculture. Previous research has tended to focus on the factors that can influence acceptance of evolution by culture or country. Our research explored the relationship on an international scale using secondary data analysis to research evolution acceptance for 35 countries. Our results indicate significant relationships between public acceptance of evolution and religiosity, school-life expectancy, science literacy, and gross domestic product per capita. Implications and future directions for research are addressed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alters BJ, Alters SM. Defending evolution: a guide to the creation/evolution controversy. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett; 2001.

Alters BJ, Nelson CE. Perspective: teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution. 2002;56(10):1891–901.

Audi R. Religious commitment and secular reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

Bloom P, Weisberg DS. Childhood origins of adult resistance of science. Science. 2007;316:996–7.

CIA. Central Intelligence Agency: World fact book. 2007. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2205.html#184

Dawkins R. The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. New York: Norton; 1986.

D'Costa VM, King CE, Kalan L, Morar M, Sung WW, Schwarz C, et al. Antibiotic resistance is ancient. Nature. 2011;477:457–61.

Diener E, Diener C. The wealth of nations revisited: Income and quality of life. Soc Indic Res. 1995;36(3):275-286.

Dobzhansky T. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach. 1973;35:125–9.

Fail J. A no-holds-barred evolution curriculum for elementary and junior high school students. Evol Educ Outreach. 2008;1(1):56–64.

Gallup G. American beliefs: evolution vs. Bible's explanation of human origins. 2006. http://www.gallup.com/poll/21811/american-beliefs-evolution-vs-bibles-explanation-human-origins.aspx. Accessed 2 Nov 2011.

Gallup G. Evolution, creationism and intelligent design. 2009. http://www.gallup.com/poll/21814/Evolution-Creationism-Intelligent-Design.aspx. Accessed 2 Nov 2011.

Gould SJ. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2002.

Hameed S. Bracing for Islamic creationism. Science. 2008;322:1637–8.

Hmelo-Silver CE, Pfeffer MG. Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cognit Sci. 2004;28(1):127–38.

Jaumotte F, Lall S, Papageorgiou C. Rising income inequality: technology, or trade and financial globalization? Washington DC: Int Monet Fund; 2008.

Mayr E. The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982.

Miller KR. Finding Darwin's God: a scientist's search for common ground between god and evolution. New York, NY: Cliff Street Books; 1999.

Miller KR. Only a theory. Evolution and the battle for America’s soul. New York: Penguin Group; 2008.

Miller JD, Scott EC, Okamoto S. Public acceptance of evolution. Science. 2006;313:765–6.

Nadelson LS, Sinatra GM. Educational professionals understanding and acceptance of evolution. J Evol Psychol. 2009;7(4):490–516.

Nadelson LS, Southerland SA. Examining the interaction of acceptance and understanding: how does the relationship change with a focus on macroevolution? Evol Educ Outreach. 2010;3:82–8.

National Research Council. Thinking evolutionarily: Evolution education across the life sciences: Summary of a convocation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.

OECD. PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: student performance in reading, mathematics and science. 2009;1. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/10/61/48852548.pdf. Retrieved 25 March 2011.

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Assessing scientific, reading, and mathematical literacy: a framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD; 2006.

Paz-y-Mino G, Espinosa A. Acceptance of evolution increases with student academic level: a comparison between a secular and a religious college. Evol Educ Outreach. 2009;2:655–75.

Scott EC. Evolution vs. creationism: an introduction. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2005.

Shermer M. Why people believe weird things: pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time. Revth ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 2002.

Sinatra GM, Nadelson LS. Science and religion: opposite ends of core epistemological continua? In: Taylor R, Ferrari M, editors. Epistemology and science education: understanding the evolution vs. intelligent design controversy. New York: Routledge; 2011. p. 173–94.

Sustersic R. The impacts of religion and education on belief in evolution. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies. Department of Economics. 2007; 1–25.

Taylor RS, Ferrari M. Epistemology and science education: Understanding the evolution vs. intelligent design controversy. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011.

Worldatlas.com: how many countries? http://www.worldatlas.com/nations.htm. Accessed 2 Nov 2011.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Thông tin tác giả