A Dialogic Inquiry Approach to Working with Teachers in Developing Classroom Dialogue

Teachers College Record - Tập 113 Số 9 - Trang 1906-1959 - 2011
Sara Hennessy1, Neil Mercer1, Paul Warwick1
1University of Cambridge

Tóm tắt

Background/Context This article describes how we refined an innovative methodology for equitable collaboration between university researchers and classroom practitioners building and refining theory together. The work builds on other coinquiry models in which complementary professional expertise is respected and deliberately exploited in order to question, understand, and improve practice. Drawing on research using digital video to help make explicit teachers’ pedagogical rationale, our approach involved intensive critical scrutiny of video recordings of teachers’ own and others’ practices. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study The study explored and reformulated definitions of classroom dialogue—in which teachers and students exchange, evaluate, and build on ideas—in the context of interactive whiteboard (IWB) use. This article focuses on the collaborative theory-building process itself, whose aim was to exploit insights derived from research to stimulate and inform thinking, guide principled development of new classroom practices, and refine the theory. Population/Participants/Subjects Three university researchers and three (primary, middle and secondary school) United Kingdom teachers, along with their students aged 10–14, took part in the research. The teachers were all experienced, reflective practitioners with an established dialogic pedagogy. They taught personal education, English, and history. Research Design A case study design was used to collect qualitative observational data. A series of three in-depth workshops focused on the construct of dialogue and critiqued associated literature. Subsequent joint review of lesson videos and other data plus two further workshops served to characterize effective strategies for supporting dialogue. Data Collection and Analysis The three initial workshops prepared teachers to design and teach three consecutive lessons employing a dialogic approach supported by IWB use. Teacher and university researcher pairs jointly reviewed the lesson videos, along with unstructured teacher diaries, interviews (three per teacher), and other contextualizing data, and two further team workshops took place. Cross-case analysis of the data, including interview and workshop transcripts, follow-up questionnaires, and accreditation reports, characterized teacher perspectives on the reflexive—and itself dialogic—coinquiry process and its outcomes. Conclusions Preconditions, critical features, and scalable benefits of our evolving approach are identified for other research partnerships. The process additionally yielded negotiated, recontextualized understandings of dialogue and strategies for fostering dialogic pedagogy. These were framed in accessible language, spontaneously shared within the schools and adapted for wider use, thus forming a springboard for further critique and modification in new settings.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alexander R. J., 1984, Change in teacher education: Context and provision since Robbins., 103

Alexander R. J. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. (4th ed.), Cambridge, England: Dialogos UK Ltd.

10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.015

Bakhtin M. N., 1981, The dialogic imagination.

Bakhtin M. N., 1986, Speech genres and other late essays., 60

10.1080/13540600701391960

10.1080/14794800902732209

10.3102/0091732X024001061

10.1080/03057640500319073

10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.003

Cardellichio T., 1997, Educational Leadership, 54, 33

10.3102/0013189X032001009

Cooper P., 1996, Effective teaching and learning: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives.

10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00241.x

10.1080/01411920600635460

diSessa A., 1991, Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface., 162

10.1007/978-94-017-1072-5_10

Elden M., 1981, Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research., 253

Elliott J., 2004, International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers., 264

10.20429/ijsotl.2007.010105

10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00689.x

10.1080/17439880701511099

Goodchild S., 2007, Learning communities in mathematics., 189

Groundwater-Smith S., 2004, International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers., 238

10.1111/1467-8527.00107

10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00416.x

10.1080/13540600903139621

Hennessy S., 2009, Teachers College Record, 111, 1753, 10.1177/016146810911100701

Hennessy S., 2008, Supporting professional development for ICT use in the secondary classroom using a multimedia resource: Final Report to NCETM.

10.1080/17439880701511131

10.3102/0013189X031005003

10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.004

10.1007/s10857-005-1223-z

Jaworski B., 2007, Learning communities in mathematics., 13

Jones S., 2009, Welsh Journal of Education, 14, 63

Leat D., 2009, Research Intelligence: News from the British Educational Research Association.

Lesh R., 2000, Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education., 665

10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00059-6

10.1080/03057640500319065

10.4324/9780203086100

Mercer N., 2000, Words and minds: How we use language to think together.

10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137

10.1080/1475939X.2010.491230

10.4324/9780203946657

Mercer N., 2007, Dialogic teaching in science classrooms: Final Report to ESRC.

10.1080/17439880701511156

Mortimer E. F., 2003, Meaning making in secondary science classrooms.

10.17763/haer.74.3.e08k1276713824u5

10.3102/0013189X018001016

10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.002

10.3102/0013189X029001004

10.1080/00405840701593923

10.1016/j.tate.2006.01.004

10.1007/978-94-010-0828-0_8

Ruthven K., 2002, Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education., 581

10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.002

10.3102/0013189X09338513

10.1080/0267152032000176855

Stenhouse L. A., 1975, An introduction to curriculum research and development., 142

10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00104.x

Säljö R., 1995, Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science., 83

10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00101.x

10.3102/0013189X026007013

10.1080/13540602.2011.554704

10.1080/17439880802496935

10.1007/978-0-387-71142-3

10.1017/CBO9780511605895

Wiske M. S., 1995, Software goes to school: Teaching for understanding with new technologies., 187