A Dialogic Inquiry Approach to Working with Teachers in Developing Classroom Dialogue
Tóm tắt
This article describes how we refined an innovative methodology for equitable collaboration between university researchers and classroom practitioners building and refining theory together. The work builds on other coinquiry models in which complementary professional expertise is respected and deliberately exploited in order to question, understand, and improve practice. Drawing on research using digital video to help make explicit teachers’ pedagogical rationale, our approach involved intensive critical scrutiny of video recordings of teachers’ own and others’ practices.
The study explored and reformulated definitions of classroom dialogue—in which teachers and students exchange, evaluate, and build on ideas—in the context of interactive whiteboard (IWB) use. This article focuses on the collaborative theory-building process itself, whose aim was to exploit insights derived from research to stimulate and inform thinking, guide principled development of new classroom practices, and refine the theory.
Three university researchers and three (primary, middle and secondary school) United Kingdom teachers, along with their students aged 10–14, took part in the research. The teachers were all experienced, reflective practitioners with an established dialogic pedagogy. They taught personal education, English, and history.
A case study design was used to collect qualitative observational data. A series of three in-depth workshops focused on the construct of dialogue and critiqued associated literature. Subsequent joint review of lesson videos and other data plus two further workshops served to characterize effective strategies for supporting dialogue.
The three initial workshops prepared teachers to design and teach three consecutive lessons employing a dialogic approach supported by IWB use. Teacher and university researcher pairs jointly reviewed the lesson videos, along with unstructured teacher diaries, interviews (three per teacher), and other contextualizing data, and two further team workshops took place. Cross-case analysis of the data, including interview and workshop transcripts, follow-up questionnaires, and accreditation reports, characterized teacher perspectives on the reflexive—and itself dialogic—coinquiry process and its outcomes.
Preconditions, critical features, and scalable benefits of our evolving approach are identified for other research partnerships. The process additionally yielded negotiated, recontextualized understandings of dialogue and strategies for fostering dialogic pedagogy. These were framed in accessible language, spontaneously shared within the schools and adapted for wider use, thus forming a springboard for further critique and modification in new settings.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexander R. J., 1984, Change in teacher education: Context and provision since Robbins., 103
Alexander R. J. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. (4th ed.), Cambridge, England: Dialogos UK Ltd.
Bakhtin M. N., 1981, The dialogic imagination.
Bakhtin M. N., 1986, Speech genres and other late essays., 60
Cardellichio T., 1997, Educational Leadership, 54, 33
Cooper P., 1996, Effective teaching and learning: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives.
diSessa A., 1991, Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface., 162
Elden M., 1981, Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research., 253
Elliott J., 2004, International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers., 264
Goodchild S., 2007, Learning communities in mathematics., 189
Groundwater-Smith S., 2004, International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers., 238
Hennessy S., 2008, Supporting professional development for ICT use in the secondary classroom using a multimedia resource: Final Report to NCETM.
Jaworski B., 2007, Learning communities in mathematics., 13
Jones S., 2009, Welsh Journal of Education, 14, 63
Leat D., 2009, Research Intelligence: News from the British Educational Research Association.
Lesh R., 2000, Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education., 665
Mercer N., 2000, Words and minds: How we use language to think together.
Mercer N., 2007, Dialogic teaching in science classrooms: Final Report to ESRC.
Mortimer E. F., 2003, Meaning making in secondary science classrooms.
Ruthven K., 2002, Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education., 581
Stenhouse L. A., 1975, An introduction to curriculum research and development., 142
Säljö R., 1995, Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science., 83
Wiske M. S., 1995, Software goes to school: Teaching for understanding with new technologies., 187