Implementing stratified care for acute low back pain in primary care using the STarT Back instrument: a process evaluation within the context of a large pragmatic cluster randomized trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders - Tập 21 - Trang 1-11 - 2020
Addie Middleton1, G. Kelley Fitzgerald2, Anthony Delitto3, Robert B. Saper4, Katherine Gergen Barnett4, Joel Stevans2,5
1New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, USA
2Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
3School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
4Department of Family Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, USA
5Health Policy Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA

Tóm tắt

Although risk-stratifying patients with acute lower back pain is a promising approach for improving long-term outcomes, efforts to implement stratified care in the US healthcare system have had limited success. The objectives of this process evaluation were to 1) examine variation in two essential processes, risk stratification of patients with low back pain and referral of high-risk patients to psychologically informed physical therapy and 2) identify barriers and facilitators related to the risk stratification and referral processes. We used a sequential mixed methods study design to evaluate implementation of stratified care at 33 primary care clinics (17 intervention, 16 control) participating in a larger pragmatic trial. We used electronic health record data to calculate: 1) clinic-level risk stratification rates (proportion of patients with back pain seen in the clinic over the study period who completed risk stratification questionnaires), 2) rates of risk stratification across different points in the clinical workflow (front desk, rooming, and time with clinician), and 3) rates of referral of high-risk patients to psychologically informed physical therapy among intervention clinics. We purposively sampled 13 clinics for onsite observations, which occurred in month 24 of the 26-month study. The overall risk stratification rate across the 33 clinics was 37.8% (range: 14.7–64.7%). Rates were highest when patients were identified as having back pain by front desk staff (overall: 91.9%, range: 80.6–100%). Rates decreased as the patient moved further into the visit (rooming, 29.3% [range: 0–83.3%]; and time with clinician, 11.3% [range: 0–49.3%]. The overall rate of referrals of high-risk patients to psychologically informed physical therapy across the 17 intervention clinics was 42.1% (range: 8.3–70.8%). Barriers included staffs’ knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, patients’ needs, technology issues, lack of physician engagement, and lack of time. Adaptability of the processes was a facilitator. Adherence to key stratified care processes varied across primary care clinics and across points in the workflow. The observed variation suggests room for improvement. Future research is needed to build on this work and more rigorously test strategies for implementing stratified care for patients with low back pain in the US healthcare system. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02647658 ). Registered January 6, 2016,

Tài liệu tham khảo

Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(23):2724–7. Institute of Medicine. Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.17226/13172. Accessed 22 Jul 2020. Carey TS, Garrett JM, Jackman A, Hadler N. Recurrence and care seeking after acute back pain: results of a long-term follow-up study. North Carolina Back pain project. Med Care. 1999;37(2):157–64. Von Korff M, Crane P, Lane M, Miglioretti DL, Simon G, Saunders K, et al. Chronic spinal pain and physical-mental comorbidity in the United States: results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Pain. 2005;113(3):331–9. Von Korff M, Saunders K. The course of back pain in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(24):2833–7 discussion 8-9. Luckhaupt SE, Dahlhamer JM, Gonzales GT, et al. Prevalence, recognition of work-relatedness, and effect on work of low back pain among U.S. workers. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(4):301–4. Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low Back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9802):1560–71. Foster NE, Mullis R, Hill JC, Lewis M, Whitehurst DG, Doyle C, et al. Effect of stratified care for low Back pain in family practice (IMPaCT Back): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(2):102–11. Cherkin D, Balderson B, Wellman R, Hsu C, Sherman KJ, Evers SC, et al. Effect of low Back pain risk-stratification strategy on patient outcomes and care processes: the MATCH randomized trial in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(8):1324–36. Cherkin D, Balderson B, Brewer G, Cook A, Estlin KT, Evers SC, et al. Evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the MATCH cluster randomized trial protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):361. Hsu C, Evers S, Balderson BH, et al. Adaptation and implementation of the STarT Back Risk Stratification Strategy in a US Health Care Organization: a process evaluation. Pain Med. 2019;20(6):1105–19. Delitto A, Patterson CG, Stevans JM, Brennan GP, Wegener ST, Morrisette DC, et al. Study protocol for targeted interventions to prevent chronic low back pain in high-risk patients: a multi-site pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (TARGET trial). Contemp Clin Trials. 2019;82:66–76. Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, et al. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(5):632–41. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258. Lau R, Stevenson F, Ong BN, Dziedzic K, Treweek S, Eldridge S, et al. Achieving change in primary care--effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009993. Korownyk C, McCormack J, Kolber MR, Garrison S, Allan GM. Competing demands and opportunities in primary care. Can Fam Physician. 2017;63(9):664–8. Agarwal SD, Pabo E, Rozenblum R, Sherritt KM. Professional dissonance and burnout in primary care: a qualitative study. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(3):395–401. DeChant PF, Acs A, Rhee KB, Boulanger TS, Snowdon JL, Tutty MA, et al. Effect of organization-directed workplace interventions on physician burnout: a systematic review. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019;3(4):384–408. Mitchell AJ, Vahabzadeh A, Magruder K. Screening for distress and depression in cancer settings: 10 lessons from 40 years of primary-care research. Psychooncology. 2011;20(6):572–84. Rodriguez HP, Meredith LS, Hamilton AB, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV. Huddle up!: the adoption and use of structured team communication for VA medical home implementation. Health Care Manag Rev. 2015;40(4):286–99.