Correlations of patch test reactivity and the repeated open application test (ROAT)/provocative use test (PUT)

Food and Chemical Toxicology - Tập 42 - Trang 1719-1725 - 2004
Clarissa D. Villarama1, Howard I. Maibach1
1Department of Dermatology, Medical School, University of California, Surge 110, San Francisco, CA 94143-0989, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ale, 1995, Clinical relevance in allergic contact dermatitis: an algorithmic approach, Dermatosen, 43, 119 Andersen, 2001, The time–dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 170, 166, 10.1006/taap.2000.9095 Basketter, 2001, Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium, Contact Dermatitis, 44, 70, 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.440202.x Bruze, 2003, Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with cinnamic aldehyde, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 48, 194, 10.1067/mjd.2003.72 Christensen, 1975, External and internal exposure to the antigen in the hand eczema of nickel allergy, Contact Dermatitis, 1, 136, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1975.tb05354.x Farm, 1998, Repeated open application tests (ROAT) in patients allergic to colophony––evaluated visually and with bioengineering techniques, Acta Derm. Venereol., 78, 130, 10.1080/000155598433476 Felter, 2003, Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis, Regulat. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 37, 1, 10.1016/S0273-2300(02)00021-1 Flyvholm, 1997, Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde-sensitive patients. Relationship to repeated open application test with a product containing a formaldehyde releaser, Contact Dermatitis, 36, 26, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00918.x Fregert, 1981 Hannuksela, 1986, The Repeated Open Application Test (ROAT), Contact Dermatitis, 14, 221, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01229.x Johansen, 1996, Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methods, Contact Dermatitis, 34, 165, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02167.x Johansen, 1996, Quantitative aspects of isoeugenol contact allergy assessed by use and patch tests, Contact Dermatitis, 34, 414, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02244.x Magnusson, 1970, Terminology of contact dermatitis, Acta Derm. Venereol., 50, 287 Marrakchi, 1994, What is occupational contact dermatitis? An operational definition, Dermatol. Clin., 12, 477, 10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30151-7 Nakada, 2000, Use tests: ROAT (repeated open application test)/PUT (provocative use test): an overview, Contact Dermatitis, 43, 1, 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043001001.x Svedman, 2003, Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with hydroxycitronellal, Contact Dermatitis, 48, 217, 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.00094.x Wanscher, 1976, Contact dermatitis from propolis, Br. J. Dermatol., 94, 451, 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1976.tb06125.x Wester, 1999, Regional variation in percutaneous absorption, 81 Zhai, 2001, Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview, Contact Dermatitis, 44, 201, 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.044004201.x