Barriers to adoption of sustainable agriculture practices: Change agent perspectives

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems - Tập 24 Số 1 - Trang 60-71 - 2009
Joysee M. Rodriguez1, Joseph J. Molnar1, Robin Antony Fazio1, Emily Sydnor1, Mecca J. Lowe1
1Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5406, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractConventional agriculture systems of production often lead to environmental degradation, economic problems and even social conflict. The efficacy of agriculture systems conducive to the economic, environmental and social sustainability of farming operations has been demonstrated, yet the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices is not widespread. This qualitative study is based on a web-based survey instrument designed to elicit the barriers to adoption of sustainable agriculture practices (SAP) perceived by a positional and network sample of 269 change agents working with farmers in the US South. The analysis examines the general proposition that reluctance to change to SAP is an overused rationale of change agents that tends to mask real barriers that we endeavor to elicit in the survey. It was found that despite having support from technical assistance providers, farmers are rarely adopting SAP. Change agents often are not well prepared to attend to farmers' needs regarding SAP, particularly the needs of specific farming situations. Thus, farmers often struggle to obtain accurate information about the benefits of SAP. Government support programs often fail to encourage adoption due to lack of funding, inappropriate design and ineffective targeting of incentives. Reluctance to change is frequently mentioned by change agents, but more as a way of blaming farmers for nonadoption than explaining the often tangible reasons for their behaviors. Social barriers, land tenure, infrastructure and incompatibility are other significant impediments to adoption. Strategies such as improved management of the existing information, careful design of economic support programs and extension efforts addressed to change agents themselves could help overcome some of the barriers identified by change agents.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

40 Conservation Technology Information Center. 2008. Conservation Tillage, Nutrient Management Planning, Top Farmers' Best Management Practices. Press Release—30 January, 2008. Available at Web site http://www.conservationinformation.org/?action=about_news_topbmpjan08 (verified 11 July 2008).

Trochim, 2001, The Research Methods Knowledge Base

10.1007/978-94-011-4395-0_7

10.5172/rsj.5.1.20

31 Marra M. , Pannell D.J. , and Ghadim A.A. 2004. The economics of risk, uncertainty, and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: where are we on the learning curve? SEA Working Paper No. 01–10. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

10.1111/j.0092-5853.2003.00526.x

33 Dyrmundsson O.R. 2000. Organic agriculture under northern conditions: Iceland. The 13th International Scientific Conference, 28–31 August 2000, Basel, Switzerland. Available at Web site http://www.organic-research.com/research/papers/iceland.asp (verified 2 April 2004).

26 Pretty J. 2001. Farmer-based agroecological technology. International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington, DC. Available at Web site www.ifpri.org/2020/focus/focus07/focus07_02.htm (verified 26 April 2005).

25 Soil and Water Conservation Society. 1995. Sustainable agriculture. Available at Web site http://www.swcs.org/t_publicaffairs_sustainable.htm (verified 13 June 2004).

23 Northwest Area Foundation. 2004. The Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture: Meeting the Challenge. Available at Web site http://www.nwaf.org/pubs/pubs_row_06.htm (verified 17 March 2007).

21 Pannell D.J. 1998. Social and economic challenge to the development of complex farming systems. Sustainability and Economics in Agriculture (SEA) Working Paper No. 97–02. University of Western Australia, WA, Nedlands, WA, Australia. Available at Web site http://www.crcsalinity.com.aunewsletter/SeaNews/spap972.htm (verified 21 September 2008).

18 Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education. 2003. Exploring sustainability in agriculture. Available at Web site http://www.sare.org/publications/explore/index.htm (verified 15 August 2005).

Diver, 1996, Toward a sustainable agriculture, New Renaissance, 6, 19

16 Ikerd J.E. , Osburn D. , and Owsley J.C. 1997. Some Missouri farmers' perspectives of sustainable agriculture. Department of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. Available at Web site http://www.ssu.agri.missouri.edu/faculty/jikerd/papers/tsu-surv.htm (verified 15 April 2005).

Schneeberger, 2002, Barriers to the adoption of organic farming by cash-crop producers in Austria, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 17, 24

10.1017/S0889189300006287

Norman, 1997, Defining and implementing sustainable agriculture, Kansas Sustainable Agriculture Series, 1, 1

10 Cary J.W. , Webb T. , and Barr N.F. 2001. The adoption of sustainable practices: some new insights. Land and Water Australia, Canberra. Available at Web site http://www.lwa.gov.au/downloads/final_reports/BRR19.pdf (verified 5 September 2005).

10.1080/13892249485300041

Nowak, 1991, Crop Residue Management for Conservation, 8

Hooks, 1983, Correlates of adoption behaviors: the case of farm technologies, Rural Sociology, 48, 308

4 USDA-National Agriculture Statistics Service. 2005. NASS FY 2003 and Revised FY2002 Annual Performance Plans. Available at Web site http://www.usda.gov/nass (verified 10 August 2007).

10.1289/ehp.02110445

13 Bell M.M. , Carolan M.S. , Mayerfeld D. , and Exner R. 2001. Professional development for the adoption of sustainable agriculture on rented land. Final Research Report. Department of Sociology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

1 Caswell M. , Fuglie K. , Ingram C. , Jans S. , and Kascak C. 2001. Adoption of Agricultural Production Practices: Lessons Learned from the US Department of Agriculture Area Studies Project. Agricultural Economic Report No. AER792. 116 pp. Available at Web site http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/AboutPDF.htm (verified 10 July 2008).

10.3368/le.81.1.1

22 Young T. 2003. Adoption of sustainable agricultural technologies: economic and non-economic determinants. ESRC Global Environmental Change Programme. Available at Web site http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/gec/pubs/briefing/brief-21.htm (verified 1 May 2005).

2004, Sustainable Agriculture

10.1300/J064v05n03_13

30 Reed M. 2004. More than just fashionable foods: the importance of social sciences in organic research. Organic-Research, March 2004. p. 1N–5N. Available at Web site http://www.Organic-Research.com (verified 17 March 2004).

10.1017/S0889189300007177

10.5032/jae.1994.01038

Vanclay, 1994, Farmer rationality and the adoption of environmentally sound practices; a critic of the assumptions of traditional agricultural extension, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 1

29 Arellanes P. and Lee D.R. 2003. The determinants of adoption of sustainable agriculture technologies: evidence from the hillsides of Honduras. The 25th International Conference of Agricultural Economists, 11–16 August 2003, Durban, South Africa.

2 Derpsch R. 1998. Historical Review of No-tillage Cultivation of Crops. Available at Web site http://www.fao.org/ag/ags/agse/3ero/harare/partii/21Derp.htm (verified 20 September 2007).

Ritchie, 2003, Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers

27 Rawson J.M. 1995. Sustainable agriculture. CRS Report for Congress 95–1062. National Library for the Environment. Available at Web site http://www.ncseonline.org (verified 17 March 2004).

10.1017/S0889189300008754

10.1017/S0889189300002964

de Souza Filho, 1997, The Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Technologies: A Case Study in the State of Espirito Santo

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Tập 24 Số 1

60-71

Thông tin tác giả