Assessment of child problem behaviors by multiple informants: a longitudinal study from preschool to school entry

David Kerr1, Erika Lunkenheimer2, Sheryl L. Olson3
1Oregon Social Learning Center, USA
2University of Oregon, Child and Family Center, USA.
3University of Michigan Psychology Department, USA

Tóm tắt

Background:  Children's early problem behavior that manifests in multiple contexts is often more serious and stable. The concurrent and predictive validity of ratings of externalizing and internalizing by four informants was examined at preschool and early school age in an at‐risk sample.

Methods:  Two hundred forty children were assessed by mothers and fathers (Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)), and teachers and laboratory examiners (Teacher Report Form (TRF)) at ages 3 and 5 years.

Results:  All informants’ ratings of externalizing converged on a common factor at ages 3 and 5 that showed strong stability over time (β = .80). All informants’ age 3 externalizing ratings significantly predicted the problem factor at age 5; mothers’, fathers’, and teachers’ ratings were independently predictive. Ratings of internalizing (except by examiners at age 3) also converged at both ages; the problem factor showed medium stability (β = .39) over time. Only fathers’ ratings of age 3 internalizing predicted the age 5 problem factor.

Conclusions:  Findings support the value of multi‐informant assessment, uphold calls to include fathers in childhood research, and suggest that examiners provide valid, though non‐unique assessment data. Examiner contributions may prove useful in many research contexts.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Achenbach T.M., 1992, Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/2–3 and 1992 Profile

Achenbach T.M., 1997, Teacher/caregiver REPORT FORM for ages 2–5

10.1007/BF00917246

Achenbach T.M., 2001, Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/6–18

10.1037/0012-1649.22.5.604

10.1038/scientificamerican0998-66

10.1017/S0954579400003114

Child Trends., 2004, America's families and living arrangements: 2004. Calculations of U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2004: Annual Social and Economic Supplement. Table C‐2

10.1037/1040-3590.4.4.419

10.1016/S0193-3973(03)00006-6

10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.483

10.1093/clipsy.7.4.435

10.1111/1469-7610.00351

Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics., 2002, America's children: Key national indicators of well‐being

10.1111/1467-8624.00534

10.1017/S0954579404044530

10.1300/J019v19n04_01

Glutting J.J., 1996, Situational specificity and generality of test behaviors for samples of normal and referred children, School Psychology Review, 25, 94, 10.1080/02796015.1996.12085804

10.1023/B:JOBA.0000013661.14995.59

10.1007/s10862-005-5383-z

Kagan J., 2002, One measure, one meaning: Multiple measures, clearer meaning, Development and Psychopathology, 14, 463, 10.1017/S0954579402003048

Kazdin A.E., 1988, The diagnosis of childhood disorders: Assessment issues and strategies, Behavioral Assessment, 10, 67

10.1176/appi.ajp.160.9.1566

10.1207/s15374424jccp1902_5

McConaughy S.H., 2004, Manual for the Test Observation Form for Ages 2–18

Merrell K.W., 1999, Behavioral, social, and emotional assessment of children and adolescents

10.1017/S0954579401002097

NICHD Early Child Care Research Network., 2004, Trajectories of physical aggression from toddlerhood to middle childhood, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69, vii

10.1097/00004583-199608000-00019

10.1017/S0954579405050029

10.1023/A:1025787613984

10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00026.x

10.1007/s10802-005-0939-7

Shaffer D., 1999, Diagnostic assessment in child and adolescent psychopathology

10.1207/s15374424jccp2201_11