Technical Aspects of LINAC Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Small Functional Targets

Journal of Radiosurgery - Tập 1 - Trang 115-127 - 1998
Timothy D. Solberg1, Antonio A. F. DeSalles2, Paul M. Medin1, John J. DeMarco1, Michael T. Selch1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Los Angeles
2Division of Neurosurgery, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles

Tóm tắt

Recently the use of stereotactic radiosurgery to treat functional disorders such as Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, and intractable pain has been reported in the literature. In such applications, a large single dose is typically delivered to an extremely small (<0.05 cm3) target volume. The purpose of this work is to investigate whether the dosimetric and imaging characteristics of radiosurgery treatment planning provide sufficient accuracy to allow efficacious therapy of functional disorders. We have begun treating trigeminal neuralgia using our linear accelerator-based radiosurgery system: 70 Gy is prescribed to the maximum dose in the volume (in our case the 100% isodose level) and delivered to the base of the fifth nerve in a single fraction using a 5 mm collimator, with the standard Brown–Roberts–Wells (BRW) radiosurgery accessories employed for fixation and localization. Because the fifth nerve cannot be visualized on x-ray computed tomography (CT), our radiosurgery treatment planning system was modified to use magnetic resonance images for localization, though dose calculations are still performed using CT. Isocentric accuracy of our original radiosurgery system, consisting of a floor stand and isocentric subunit, and our new couch mount system, was evaluated using the Winston–Lutz film test method. In order to evaluate the spatial accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) treatment planning, eight 4 mm sections of a 7 French catheter were filled with CuSO4 contrast material and attached rigidly to the stereotactic fixation posts of our BRW frame, four each in orientations parallel and perpendicular to the axial plane. The position of the externally placed fiducial markers, as well as internal anatomical structures, were then compared with CT. Monte Carlo calculations were compared with those from a commercial radiosurgery treatment planning system in order to investigate the effects of tissue heterogeneities on the resulting dose distributions. While commercial radiosurgery systems assume tissue homogeneity, the Monte Carlo calculations were performed in a patient-specific CT geometry accounting for all tissue inhomogeneities. The resulting 128 × 128 Monte Carlo dose grid was superimposed on the original CT data for analysis and comparison with identical treatment plans from the commercial system. The ability of our LINAC-based systems to accurately target a desired point in space has been effectively demonstrated: 0.32 ± 0.32 mm (N = 556) for our floor stand system and 0.34 ± 0.23 mm (N = 50) for our newer couch-mounted system. Inaccuracies introduced by tomographic imaging devices are significantly greater. The use of gel-filled fiducial markers in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided radiosurgery produces significant spatial distortion, resulting in Euclidean root-mean-square deviations of 2.32 ± 0.96 mm (N = 31) and 3.64 ± 1.28 mm (N = 27) at the center and periphery (extracranial) of the field of view respectively, as compared with CT. Use of water of CuSO4 filled rods had a minimal effect on these deviations: 2.51 ± 1.25 mm (N = 31) and 3.37 ± 1.28 mm (N =27) for central and peripheral targets respectively. Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in the frequency encoding (AP) direction produce a systematic posterior shift. This together with axial slice spacing accounts for the majority of the deviation. Tissue heterogeneities such as bone and air cavities produce a lateral spreading of the dose from small photon beams, resulting in a prescription dose volume smaller than predicted by conventional treatment planning systems. For a typical are configuration designed to produce a spherical dose volume, Monte Carlo calculations show the 90% dose volume to be significantly smaller than that predicted by the commercial system when either 5 mm or 10 mm collimators are used. Use of a LINAC-based system does not preclude accurate treatment of small functional targets. Isocentric uncertainty for either of two LINAC systems that we evaluated is small compared to imaging and dosimetric factors. However, chemical shifts and object-induced magnetic susceptibility artifacts can produce systematic spatial distortions in magnetic resonance images; thus, MR imaging may not possess the inherent accuracy necessary for stereotactic localization and targeting of small cranial structures. In addition, both CT and MR possess an inherent inaccuracy of at least one-half of the axial slice thickness; thus, for localization purposes, a slice spacing as small as possible should be used when treating small targets. Tissue heterogeneities decrease the volume covered by the higher isodose lines. As a result, the target may be only partially covered by the intended dose level, with the remainder lying in the high gradient region. This same lateral spreading may also increase the risk to adjacent normal structures. Imaging and dosimetric considerations are not unique to linear accelerator systems but apply equally to all stereotactic photon irradiation. Until spatial and dosimetric errors can be accounted for, use of a larger collimator will ensure better coverage of small targets.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Leksell L: The stereotactic method and radiosurgery of the brain. Acta Chir Scand 102:316–319, 1951 Leksell L: Stereotaxic radiosurgery in trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Chir Scand 137:311–314, 1971 Hakanson S: Trigeminal neuralgia treated by injection of glycerol into the trigeminal cistern. Neurosurgery 9:638–646, 1981 Barcia-Salorio JL, Barcia JA, Hernandez G, Lopez-Gomez L: Radiosurgery of epilepsy: Long-term results. Acta Neurochir 62(suppl):111–113, 1994 Young RF, Vermeulen SS, Grimm P, Posewitz AE, Jacques DB, Rand RW, Copcutt BG: Gamma knife thalamotomy for the treatment of persistent pain. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 64(suppl): 172–181, 1995 Friehs GM, Ojakangas CL, Pachatz P, Schrottner O, Ott E, Pendl G: Thalamotomy and caudatotomy with the gamma knife as a treatment for Parkinsonism with a comment on lesion sizes. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 64(suppl):209–221, 1995 Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Flickenger JC, Young RF, Vermeulen S, Duma CM, Jacques DB, Rand RW, Regis J, Peragut J, Manera L, Epstein MH, Lindquist C: Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: A multiinstitutional study using the gamma unit. J Neurosurg 84:940–945, 1996 Maciunas RJ, Galloway RL, Latimer JW: The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. Neurosurgery 35:682–694, 1994 Yeung D, Palta J, Fontanesi J, Kun L: Systematic analysis of errors in target localization and treatment delivery in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 28:493–498, 1993 Sumanaweera TS, Adler JR, Napel S, Glover GH: Characterization of spatial distortion in magnetic resonance imaging and its implications for stereotactic surgery. Neurosurgery 35:696–704, 1994 Schad L, Lott S, Schmitt F, Sturm V, Lorenz WJ: Correction of spatial distortion in MR imaging: A prerequisite for accurate stereotaxy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 11:499–505, 1987 Cohen DS, Lustgarten JH, Miller E, Khandji AG, Goodman RR: Effects of coregistration of MR to CT images on MR stereotactic accuracy. J Neurosurg 82:772–779, 1995 Medin PM, DeSalles AAF, Solberg TD: Accuracy of MRI for radiosurgery planning. Med Phys 22:1542, 1995 (Abstract) Taha JM, Lamba MA, Samaratunga C, Breneman JC, Warnick RE: A method to reduce systemic spatial shift associated with magnetic resonance imaging for stereotactic surgery. In Proceedings of the 1995 Quadrennial Meeting of the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, pp 104–105 1995, (Abstract) Solberg TD, Holly FE, DeSalles AAF, Smathers JB: Implications of tissue heterogeneity for radiosurgery in head and neck tumors. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys, 32:235–239, 1995 DeMarco JD, Solberg TD, Smathers JB: A CT-based Monte Carlo simulation tool for dosimetry planning and analysis. Accepted for publication (Medical Physics) Hartmann Siantar CL, Bergstrom PM, Chandler WP, Chase L, Cox LJ, Daly TP, Garrett D, Hornstein SM, House RK, Moses EI, Patterson RW, Rathkopf JA, Schach von Wittenau A: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's PEREGRINE Project. In Proceedings of the XII International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy. DD Leavitt, G Starkshall (eds), Madison Wisconsin, Medical Physics Publishing, 1997, pp 19–22 Mohan R: Why Monte Carlo. In Proceedings of the XII International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy. DD Leavitt, G Starkshall (eds). Madison Wisconsin, Medical Physics Publishing, 1997, pp 16–18 Wong JW, Henkelman RM: A new approach to CT pixel-based photon dose calculations in heterogeneous media. Med Phys 10: 199–208, 1983 Maitz AH, Wu A, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Bloomer WD: Quality assurance for gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32:1465–1471, 1995 Wu A, Lindner G, Maitz AH, Kalend AM, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC, Bloomer WD: Physics of gamma knife approach on convergent beams in stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 18:941–949, 1990 Tsai J-S, Curran BH, Sternick ES, Engler MJ: Use of a 1 mm collimator to test the accuracy of stereotactic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 35:579–586, 1996 Friedman WA, Bova FJ: The University of Florida radiosurgery system. Surg Neurol 32:334–342, 1989 Lutz W, Winston KR, Makeki N: A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14: 373–381, 1988 DeMarco JJ, Solberg TD, Wallace RE, Smathers JB: Performance analysis of the Monte Carlo code MCNP4A for photon-based radiotherapy applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Computations, Reactor Physics, and Environmental Analyses, vol. 2. La Grange Park, Illinois. American Nuclear Society, Inc. Publishing, 1995, pp. 838–846 Solberg TD, DeMarco JJ, Holly FE, Smathers JB: Monte Carlo treatment planning for stereotactic radiosurgery. Submitted for publication, 1997 MCNP—A general Monte Carlo N-Particle transport code, version 4A. Briesmeister JF (ed). Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-12625, 1993 Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. Report No. 23 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1974 Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. Report No. 44 of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 1989 Kondziolka D, Dempsey PK, Lunsford LD, Kestle JRW, Dolan EJ, Kanak E, Tasker RR: A comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for stereotactic coordinate determination. Neurosurgery 30:402–406, 1992 DeSalles AAF, Solberg TD, Medin PM, Vassilev V, Cabatan-Awang C, Selch MT: Linear accelerator radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. In Radiosurgery 1997 (vol. 2). D Kondziolka (ed). Basel, Karger, 1998, pp 173–182