The initial phase of fracture healing is specifically sensitive to mechanical conditions

Journal of Orthopaedic Research - Tập 21 - Trang 662-669 - 2003
Petra Klein1, Hanna Schell1, Florian Streitparth1, Markus Heller1, Jean-Pierre Kassi1, Frank Kandziora1, Hermann Bragulla2, Norbert P Haas1, Georg N Duda1
1Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt University of Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
2Institute for Veterinary Anatomy, Free University of Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany

Tóm tắt

AbstractInterfragmentary movements affect the quality and quantity of callus formation. The mounting plane of monolateral external fixators may give direction to those movements. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the influence of the fixator mounting plane on the process of fracture healing.Identically configured fixators were mounted either medially or anteromedially on the tibiae of sheep. Interfragmentary movements and ground reaction forces were evaluated in vivo during a nine week period. Histomorphological and biomechanical parameters described the bone healing processes.Changing only the mounting plane led to a modification of interfragmentary movements in the initial healing phase. The difference in interfragmentary movements between the groups was only significant during the first post‐operative period. However, these initial differences in mechanical conditions influenced callus tissue formation significantly. The group with the anteromedially mounted fixator, initially showing significantly more interfragmentary movements, ended up with a significantly smaller callus diameter and a significantly higher callus stiffness as a result of advanced fracture healing. This demonstrates that the initial phase of healing is sensitive to mechanical conditions and influences the course of healing. Therefore, initial mechanical stability of an osteosynthesis should be considered an important factor in clinical fracture treatment. © 2003 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1097/00003086-199607000-00031 10.1097/00005131-200101000-00010 Bail HJ, 2000, Systematically administered growth hormone enhances the early phase of osteochondral defect healing, 182 10.1097/00005131-199705000-00002 Chao EY, 1989, The effect of rigidity on fracture healing in external fixation, Clin Orthop, 241, 24 10.1002/jor.1100090116 Claes L, 1991, Measuring bone healing in osteosynthesis with external fixator using the Fraktometer FM 100, Chirurg, 62, 354 10.1002/jor.1100150414 10.1007/s001040051172 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00015 Draper ER, 1997, The design and performance of an experimental external fixator with variable axial stiffness and a compressive force transducer, Med Eng Phys, 19, 690, 10.1016/S1350-4533(97)00037-4 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00127-9 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00115-2 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00237-2 10.1097/00003086-200203000-00025 10.1097/00005373-199302000-00001 10.1097/00003086-199703000-00030 10.1136/ard.51.1.4 10.1016/S0021-9290(05)80002-8 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00012 Hente R, 1999, Fracture healing of the sheep tibia treated using a unilateral external fixator. Comparison of static and dynamic fixation, Injury, 30, A44 10.1515/bmte.2001.46.9.247 Klein P, 2002, Mounting plane of external fixators influences callus tissue formation, 715 10.1016/S0736-0266(00)00006-1 Miclau T, 2002, The effect of early stability on fracture repair, 0709 10.1016/S0945-053X(00)00050-0 10.2106/00004623-199806000-00011 10.3109/08941939709032137 10.1046/j.1460-9584.1997.00043.x 10.2106/00004623-197759030-00014 10.1002/jor.1100140114 10.1007/BF02585799 Wallace AL, 1994, The vascular response to fracture micromovement, Clin Orthop, 301, 281, 10.1097/00003086-199404000-00044 10.1126/science.7684161 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00097-7 10.2106/00004623-198466080-00015 10.2106/00004623-195537050-00013