Risk factors for robotic gynecologic procedures requiring conversion to other surgical procedures

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics - Tập 135 - Trang 299-303 - 2016
Cecile A. Unger1, Mark P. Lachiewicz1, Beri Ridgeway1
1Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health Institute, Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjectiveTo determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, conversion from robotic gynecologic procedures to other procedure types.MethodsA retrospective cohort study included data from women who underwent any robotic gynecologic procedures between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012 at a tertiary care referral center in the USA. Demographic data, perioperative data, and surgeon experience (monthly case volume) data were retrieved; potential risk factors were compared between robotic procedures that were converted to other procedures and those completed as robotic procedures.ResultsThere were 942 robotic procedures during the study period. Conversion from robotic to any other type of procedure was recorded for 47 (5.0%, 95% confidence interval 3.8–6.6) procedures and robotic‐to‐open‐surgery conversion occurred in 16 (1.7%, 95% confidence interval 1.0–2.7) procedures. Conversion from robotic surgery to another approach was associated with higher body mass index (P < 0.001), previous laparotomy (P = 0.042), and surgeons having a lower monthly robotic surgical case volume (P = 0.011). Asthma (P = 0.008), intra‐operative bowel injury (P < 0.001), intra‐operative vascular injury (P = 0.003), and single‐port robotic surgery (P = 0.034) were associated with increased odds of requiring conversion from robotic procedures.ConclusionThe overall incidence of conversion from robotic surgery to laparotomy was low. Higher body mass index, previous laparotomy, history of asthma, using a single‐port approach, and surgeon case volume were associated with the risk of conversion.

Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1056/NEJMp1006602 10.1007/s11912-007-0066-4 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32831ffe8e 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.050 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008 Liu H., 2014, Robot‐assisted surgery in gynaecology, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318231537c 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182602c7d 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265b61a 10.4293/108680812X13517013317914 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.008 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.016 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.871 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000224 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000070 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.020 Kaye A.D., 2013, Anesthetic considerations in robotic‐assisted gynecologic surgery, Ochsner J, 13, 517 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.009 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.008 10.1002/rcs.1567 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.017 10.3802/jgo.2013.24.4.303 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.003 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.057 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.07.129
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Tập 135

299-303

Thông tin tác giả