Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences

Journal of Marketing - Tập 57 Số 3 - Trang 53-70 - 1993
Bernard J. Jaworski1, Ajay K. Kohli2
1Associate Professor in the Department of Marketing at the Karl Eller Graduate School of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson and currently Visiting Associate Professor, Harvard Business School.
2Associate Professor in the Department of Marketing Administration, College of Business Administration, University of Texas—Austin.

Tóm tắt

This research addresses three questions: (1) Why are some organizations more market-oriented than others? (2) What effect does a market orientation have on employees and business performance? (3) Does the linkage between a market orientation and business performance depend on the environmental context? The findings from two national samples suggest that a market orientation is related to top management emphasis on the orientation, risk aversion of top managers, interdepartmental conflict and connectedness, centralization, and reward system orientation. Furthermore, the findings suggest that a market orientation is related to overall (judgmental) business performance (but not market share), employees’ organizational commitment, and esprit de corps. Finally, the linkage between a market orientation and performance appears to be robust across environmental contexts that are characterized by varying degrees of market turbulence, competitive intensity, and technological turbulence.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2307/2092683

10.2307/2090773

10.1177/002224298504900201

10.1016/0030-5073(82)90254-9

10.1177/002224297103500406

10.1016/0007-6813(79)90088-0

10.1177/002224299005400206

Borch Fred J., 1957, The Marketing Concept: Its Meaning to Management, 3

10.1287/mnsc.36.10.1160

10.2307/1910133

10.1177/002224377901600110

Cronbach Lee J., 1981, Toward Reform in Program Evaluation.

Day George S., 1990, Market Driven Strategy: Processes for Creating Value.

10.1177/002224299305700102

10.1177/002224298805200201

10.1177/002224378201900102

10.1177/002224298905300102

Felton Arthur P., 1959, Harvard Business Review, 37, 55

10.1177/002224298404800303

Hage Jerald, 1970, Social Change in Complex Organizations.

10.2307/2092844

10.5465/amr.1984.4277628

10.1177/002224296502900303

Hopwood Anthony, 1974, Accounting and Human Behavior.

10.1177/002224298605000207

10.1177/002224298705100404

10.1177/002224298805200303

10.1177/002224297103500205

10.1177/002224299005400201

Lawler Edward E., 1976, Information and Control in Organizations.

Levitt Theodore, 1969, The Marketing Mode.

Lundstrom William J., 1976, Marquette Business Review, 20, 214

10.1016/0007-6813(76)90011-2

10.1177/009207038701500301

McKitterick John B., 1957, The Frontiers of Marketing Thought and Science, 71

10.1177/002224297203600109

10.2307/1251757

Narver John C., 1991, “Becoming More Market Oriented: An Exploratory Study of the Programmatic and Market-Back Approaches,”

Nunnally Jum C., 1978, Psychometric Theory

10.1177/002224298504900403

Patton Michael Q., 1978, Utilization Focused Evaluation.

Porter Michael E., 1980, Competitive Strategy.

Raven Bertram H., 1970, The Structure of Conflict, 69

10.1177/002224298705100101

Shapiro Benson P., 1988, Harvard Business Review, 66, 119

10.1177/002224378201900201

Stampfl Ronald W., 1978, MSU Business Topics, 26, 5

10.1016/0007-6813(74)90070-6

10.1177/002224298705100302

10.1016/0007-6813(88)90006-7

Zaltman Gerald, 1973, Innovations and Organizations.

Zaltman Gerald, 1982, Theory Construction in Marketing.