Age-related injury risk curves for the lumbar spine for use in low-back-pain prevention in manual handling tasks

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 6 - Trang 1-10 - 2019
Naoki Kudo1, Yoji Yamada1, Daisuke Ito1
1Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

Tóm tắt

This study introduces injury risk curves for the lumbar spine for use in the risk assessment of low back pain (LBP) caused by manual lifting of heavy loads. LBP has been a longstanding problem among industrial workers, giving rise to the development of assistive devices. However, quantitative evaluation methods to verify the safety of such devices have not yet been established. The notable biomechanical criterion of 3.4 kN of lumbar compressive force, defined by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, applies only to young, healthy workers with a fixed risk level. This study on injury risk curves clarified the risk level of injury to the lumbar spine due to lumbar compressive force for individuals within a wide age range. The findings can be applied for the design and evaluation of assistive devices as well as the design of ergonomic guidelines for manual work.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Fujimura T, Yasuda N, Ohara H (1995) Work-related factors of low back pain among nursing aides in nursing homes for the elderly. J Occup Health 37(2):89–98 Hara H, Sankai Y (2010) Development of HAL for lumbar support. In: SCIS & ISIS, vol. 2010. Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics, pp 416–421 Imamura Y, Tanaka T, Ayusawa K, Yoshida E (2014) Verification of assistive effect generated by passive power-assist device using humanoid robot. In: System integration (SII), 2014 IEEE/SICE international symposium on, pp 761–766. IEEE Japanese Standards Association (2017) Personal care robots—part 1: physical assistant robots for lumbar support. Standard JIS B 8456-1:2017 NIOSH (1981) Work practices guide for manual lifting. Technical Report, pp 81–122 Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Fine LJ (1993) Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 36(7):749–776 Lu M-L, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Davis KG (2016) Evaluation of the impact of the revised national institute for occupational safety and health lifting equation. Hum Factors 58(5):667–682 Chaffin D, Andersson G, Martin B (2006) Occupational biomechanics, 4th edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York Ulrey BL, Fathallah FA (2013) Subject-specific, whole-body models of the stooped posture with a personal weight transfer device. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 23(1):206–215 Potvin JR (2014) Comparing the revised NIOSH lifting equation to the psychophysical, biomechanical and physiological criteria used in its development. Int J Ind Ergon 44(2):246–252 Lu S-Y, Ing Y-S, Lee C-L, Pan Y-T (2014) Development and validation of a posture driven tool to estimate the hazards of manual lifting. Adv Phys Ergon Hum Factors Part I 14:299 Arjmand N, Amini M, Shirazi-Adl A, Plamondon A, Parnianpour M (2015) Revised NIOSH lifting equation may generate spine loads exceeding recommended limits. Int J Ind Ergon 47:1–8 Ray PK, Parida R, Sarkar S (2015) Ergonomic analysis of construction jobs in india: a biomechanical modelling approach. Proc Manuf 3:4606–4612 Gallagher S, Heberger JR (2015) The effects of operator position, pallet orientation, and palletizing condition on low back loads in manual bag palletizing operations. Int J Ind Ergon 47:84–92 Afshari D, Kord S, Latifi SM, Mardi G et al (2016) The adequacy of NIOSH equation to to determine the rate of stresses exerted on the back based on compressive force estimation. Jundishapur J Health Sci 9(1):e37726 Gallagher S, Mayton A (2007) Back injury control measures for manual lifting and seat design. Min Eng 59(12):41–49 Bogduk N (2005) Clinical anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London Gallagher S (2008) Reducing low back pain and disability in mining. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication, Pittsburgh Adams MA, Freeman BJ, Morrison HP, Nelson IW, Dolan P (2000) Mechanical initiation of intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 25(13):1625–1636 Genaidy A, Waly S, Khalil T, Hidalgo J (1993) Spinal compression tolerance limits for the design of manual material handling operations in the workplace. Ergonomics 36(4):415–434 Jäger M, Luttmann A (1999) Critical survey on the biomechanical criterion in the NIOSH method for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Int J Ind Ergon 23(4):331–337 Newman JA, Tylko S, Miller T (1994) Toward a comprehensive biomechanical injury cost model. Accid Anal Prev 26(3):305–314 Rupp JD, Flannagan CA, Kuppa SM (2010) An injury risk curve for the hip for use in frontal impact crash testing. J Biomech 43(3):527–531 Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Hilweg D (1988) Fatigue fracture of human lumbar vertebrae. Clin Biomech 3:23 Hansson T, Roos B, Nachemson A (1980) The bone mineral content and ultimate compressive strength of lumbar vertebrae. Spine 5(1):46–55 Hutton W, Adams M (1982) Can the lumbar spine be crushed in heavy lifting? Spine 7(6):586–590 Hansson T, Roos B (1980) The influence of age, height, and weight on the bone mineral content of lumbar vertebrae. Spine 5(6):545–551 Adams M, Hutton W (1982) Prolapsed intervertebral disc: a hyperflexion injury. Spine 7(3):184–191 Ebbesen EN, Thomsen JS, Beck-Nielsen H, Nepper-Rasmussen HJ, Mosekilde L (1999) Age-and gender-related differences in vertebral bone mass, density, and strength. J Bone Miner Res 14(8):1394–1403 Eie N (1966) Load capacity of the low back. J Oslo City Hosp 16(4):73–98 Brinckmann P, Frobin W, Hierholzer E, Horst M (1983) Deformation of the vertebral end-plate under axial loading of the spine. Spine 8(8):851–856 Parzen E (1962) On estimation of a probability density function and mode. Ann Math Stat 3:1065–1076 Bowman AW, Azzalini A (1997) Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: the kernel approach with S-plus illustrations. Oxford University Press, New York Merryweather AS, Loertscher MC, Bloswick DS (2009) A revised back compressive force estimation model for ergonomic evaluation of lifting tasks. Work 34(3):263–272 Arjmand N, Plamondon A, Shirazi-Adl A, Lariviere C, Parnianpour M (2011) Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks. J Biomech 44(1):84–91 Rajaee MA, Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A, Plamondon A, Schmidt H (2015) Comparative evaluation of six quantitative lifting tools to estimate spine loads during static activities. Appl Ergon 48:22–32 Sonoda T (1962) Studies on the strength for compression, tension and torsion of the human vertebral column. J Kyoto Pref Med Univ 71:659–702 (in Japanese) Mann HB, Whitney DR (1947) On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 18:50–60 McGill SM (1997) The biomechanics of low back injury: implications on current practice in industry and the clinic. J Biomech 30(5):465–475 McGill S, Norman R, Yingling V, Wells R, Neumann P (1998) Shear happens! suggested guidelines for ergonomists to reduce the risk of low back injury from shear loading. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Human Factors Association of Canada, pp 157–161 Gallagher S, Marras WS (2012) Tolerance of the lumbar spine to shear: a review and recommended exposure limits. Clin Biomech 27(10):973–978