Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer

Strategic Management Journal - Tập 17 Số S2 - Trang 77-91 - 1996
David C. Mowery1, Joanne E. Oxley2, Brian S. Silverman3
1Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A. and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2University of Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.
3Faculty of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis paper examines interfirm knowledge transfers within strategic alliances. Using a new measure of changes in alliance partners' technological capabilities, based on the citation patterns of their patent portfolios, we analyze changes in the extent to which partner firms' technological resources ‘overlap’ as a result of alliance participation. This measure allows us to test hypotheses from the literature on interfirm knowledge transfer in alliances, with interesting results: we find support for some elements of this ‘received wisdom’—equity arrangements promote greater knowledge transfer, and ‘absorptive capacity’ helps explain the extent of technological capability transfer, at least in some alliances. But the results also suggest limits to the ‘capabilities acquisition’ view of strategic alliances. Consistent with the argument that alliance activity can promote increased specialization, we find that the capabilities of partner firms become more divergent in a substantial subset of alliances.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agmon T., 1991, Technology Transfer in International Business., 10.1093/oso/9780195062359.001.0001

10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231

10.2307/2393553

10.1287/orsc.7.5.477

10.1287/orsc.7.2.136

10.1016/0048-7333(92)90001-K

Grant R. M., 1995, ‘A knowledge‐based theory of inter‐firm collaboration’, 17

Griliches Z., 1990, ‘Patent statistics as economic indicators’, Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198288077.001.0001

10.2307/2393756

10.1002/smj.4250140505

Hagedoorn J., 1990, New Explorations in the Economics of Technical Change., 3

10.1002/smj.4250120908

Hamel G., 1989, ‘Collaborate with your competitors—and win’, Harvard Business Review, 67, 133

Harrigan K., 1986, Managing for Joint Venture Success.

10.1002/smj.4250090205

Khanna T.(1996).‘Winner‐take‐all alliances’ Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 96–033.

10.1002/smj.4250090403

Lyles M. A., 1988, ‘Learning among joint venture sophisticated firms’, Management International Review, 28, 85

Mansfield E.(30 September1988).‘Industrial innovation in Japan and the United States’ Science pp.1769–1774.

10.2307/2098340

10.1016/0167-2681(93)90088-7

10.1016/0167-2681(91)90005-I

10.1016/0014-4983(83)90024-4

Mowery D. C., 1988, International Collaborative Ventures in U.S. Manufacturing.

Mowery D. C. J. E.OxleyandB. S.Silverman(1997).‘Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource‐based view of the firm’ Research Policy forthcoming.

10.1016/0167-7187(95)00508-0

Oxley J. E.(1996).‘Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach’ University of Michigan working paper #9602–23.

Patel P., 1994, ‘Technological competencies in the world's largest firms: Characteristics, constraints and scope for managerial choice’

Penrose E. T., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm.

10.2307/2393554

Porter M. E., 1986, Competition in Global Industries., 315

Powell W., 1992, Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action., 365

Reich R. B., 1986, ‘Joint ventures with Japan give away our future’, Harvard Business Review, 64, 78

Rosenberg N., 1991, International Technology Transfer: Concepts, Measures and Comparison.

10.1002/smj.4250110205

Silverman B. S., 1996, ‘Technical assets and the logic of corporate diversification’

Sobrero M.andE. B.Roberts(1996).‘The trade‐off between efficiency and learning in inter‐organizational relationships’ MIT Sloan School of Management working paper WP#3896.

Teece D. J., 1997, ‘Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a

10.1002/smj.4250050207