Effects of personalized e-mail messages on privacy risk: Moderating roles of control and intimacy
Tóm tắt
New communication platforms have enabled firms to collect personal data on their consumers and provide more personalized services. Personalized service facilitates interpersonal communication and interactions based on consumers’ personal and preference information, and therefore constitutes a way to improve firm–customer relationships. However, such personalized services may be vulnerable to privacy issues. This study investigates the effects of personalized e-mail messages (an archetypal example of personalized service) on consumers’ risk perceptions and two moderating variables: consumers’ control and message intimacy. In three experiments, we show that an increase in the level of personalization in e-mail messages increases consumers’ privacy risk perceptions. However, giving consumers more control over their personal information and adding intimate cues to e-mail messages moderate the negative effects of personalized e-mail messages on their privacy risk perceptions. The study provides important implications for both academics and managers in developing and employing personalized service in new media communication.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Personalization technologies: a process-oriented perspective. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 83–90.
Arora, N., Dreze, X., Ghose, A., Hess, J. D., Iyengar, R., King, B., et al. (2008). Putting one-to-one marketing to work: Personalization, customization, and choice. Marketing Letters, 19(3–4), 305–321.
Averill, J. R. (1973). Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychological Bulletin, 80(4), 286–303.
Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). The personalization privacy paradox: an empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 13–28.
Chellappa, R. K., & Sin, R. G. (2005). Personalization versus privacy: an empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Information Technology and Management, 6(2–3), 181–202.
Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychology& Behavior, 12(3), 341–345.
Dholakia, R.R., Zhao, M., Dholakia, N., & Fortin, D. R. (2000). Interactivity and revisits to website: A theoretical framework. RITIM Working Paper (http://ritim.uri.edu/wp/).
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlov, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451–474.
Foxman, E. R., & Kilcoyne, P. (1993). Information technology, marketing practice, and consumer privacy: Ethical issues. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12(1), 106–119.
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 32(6), 407–424.
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. E. (2011). Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Science, 57(1), 57–71.
Holzwarth, M., Janiszewski, C., & Neumann, M. M. (2006). The influence of avatars on online consumer shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 19–36.
Howard, D. J., & Kerin, R. A. (2004). The effects of personalized product recommendations on advertisement response rates: the try this. It works! technique. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3), 271–279.
Johnson, G. J., Bruner, G. C., II, & Kumar, A. (2006). Interactivity and its facets revisited. Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 35–52.
Komiak, S. Y. X., & Benbasat, I. (2006). The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 941–960.
Mathwick, C., & Rigdon, E. (2004). Play, flow, and the online search experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 324–332.
McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J. S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: an exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29–41.
Milne, G. R., & Boza, M. E. (1999). Trust and concern in consumers’ perceptions of marketing information management practices. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13(1), 5–24.
Milne, G. R., & Gordon, M. E. (1993). Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12(2), 206–215.
Montgomery, A. L., & Smith, M. D. (2009). Prospects for personalization on the Internet. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(2), 130–137.
Moon, Y. (2002). Personalization and personality: Some effects of customizing message style based on consumer personality. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(4), 313–326.
Nyshadham, E. A. (2000). Privacy policies of air travel web sites: a survey and analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management, 6(3), 143–152.
Pavlov, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134.
Rust, R. T., & Huang, M. H. (2011). Service marketing: Insights and directions. Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.
Sackmann, S., Struker, J., & Accorsi, R. (2006). Personalization in privacy aware highly dynamic systems. Communications of the ACM, 49(9), 32–38.
Schumann, J. H., von Wangenheim, F., & Groene, N. (2014). Targeted online advertising: Using reciprocity appeals to increase acceptance among users of free web services. Journal of Marketing, 78(1), 59–75.
Shen, A., & Ball, A. D. (2009). Is personalization of service always a good thing? Exploring the role of technology-mediated personalization (TMP) in service relationships. Journal of Services Marketing, 23(2), 79–91.
Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
Song, J. H., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2008). Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. Journal of Marketing, 72(2), 99–113.
Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93.
Surprenant, C. F., & Solomon, M. R. (1987). Predictability and personalization in the service encounter. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 73–80.
Technology Marketing Corporation (2011). Poor e-mail management is risky business, according to Oasys survey. TMCnet.com. http://technews.tmcnet.com/hosted-exchange/topics/hosted-exchange/articles/233939-poor-e-mail-management-risky-business-according-oasys.htm. Accessed 7 November 2011.
Thorbjørnsen, H., Supphellen, M., Nysveen, H., & Pedersen, P. E. (2002). Building brand relationships online: a comparison of two applications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(3), 17–34.
van Doorn, J., & Hoekstra, J. C. (2013). Customization of online advertising: the role of intrusiveness. Marketing Letters, 24, 339–351.
Vesanen, J. (2007). What is personalization? A conceptual framework. European Journal of Marketing, 41(5/6), 409–418.
Weiner, R. S. (2009). New communications approaches in marketing: Issues and research directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(2), 108–117.
Westin, A. F. (2003). Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 431–453.
White, T. B., Zahay, D. L., Thorbjørnsen, H., & Shavitt, S. (2008). Getting too personal: Reactance to highly personalized email solicitations. Marketing Letters, 19(1), 39–50.
Xia, L., & Bechwati, N. N. (2008). Word of mouse: the role of cognitive personalization in online consumer reviews. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 9(1), 108–128.
Zahay, D., & Griffin, A. (2003). Information antecedents of personalisation and customisation in business-to-business service markets. Journal of Database Marketing, 10(3), 255–271.