Qualitative audit materiality and earnings management
Tóm tắt
This study investigates auditors’ propensity to rely on quantitative materiality thresholds to the exclusion of qualitative materiality thresholds. Specifically, we examine whether auditors are more likely to allow earnings management that is less than typical quantitative materiality thresholds but that nonetheless is qualitatively material. We use changes in tax expense as a proxy for earnings management. Our results indicate that companies with pre-managed earnings that would have missed the consensus analyst forecast are more likely to decrease their tax expense when the magnitude of the decrease is less than quantitative audit materiality thresholds. The results also indicate that firms are more likely to meet or beat the forecast when the amount of earnings management necessary to meet the analyst forecast is less than quantitative materiality. These results are consistent with auditors relying on quantitative materiality thresholds to the exclusion of qualitative materiality thresholds, i.e., the importance of meeting or beating the analyst forecast. Finally, we find that the ability to use tax expense reduction within quantitative materiality to meet or beat analysts’ consensus forecasts was significantly reduced by the SEC’s guidance on materiality in SAB-99 and by the passage of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abarbanell, J., & Lehavy, R. (2003). Can stock recommendations predict earnings management and analysts’ earnings forecast errors? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 1–31.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2004). Codification of statements on auditing standards. New York, NY: AICPA.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2006). Statement on Auditing Standards No. 107, Audit risk and materiality in conducting an audit. New York, NY: AICPA.
Bartov, E., Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2002). The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(2), 173–204.
Beaver, W., Eger, C., Ryan, S., & Wolfson, M. (1989). Financial reporting, supplemental disclosures and bank share prices. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(2), 157–178.
Bhushan, R. (1989). Firm characteristics and analyst following. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(2/3), 255–274.
Big Five Audit Materiality Task Force. (1998). Report of the big five audit materiality task force. New York, NY: AICPA.
Brody, R. G., Lowe, D., & Pany, K. (2003). Could $51 million be immaterial when Enron reports income of $105 million? Accounting Horizons, 17(2), 153–160.
Brown, L. D. (1997). Analyst forecast errors: Additional evidence. Financial Analysts Journal, 53(6), 81–88.
Brown, L. D. (2001). A temporal analysis of earnings surprises: Profit versus losses. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(2), 221–241.
Brown, L. D., & Caylor, M. (2005). A temporal analysis of quarterly earnings thresholds: Propensities and valuation consequences. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 423–440.
Burgstahler, D., & Dichev, I. (1997a). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 99–126.
Burgstahler, D., & Dichev, I. (1997b). Earnings adaptation and equity value. The Accounting Review, 72(2), 187–215.
Burgstahler, D., & Eames, M. (2006). Management of earnings and analysts’ forecasts to achieve zero and small positive earnings surprises. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(5/6), 633–652.
Carpenter, B. W., & Dirsmith, M. W. (1992). Early debt extinguishment transactions and auditor materiality judgments: A bounded rationality perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(8), 709–740.
Chewning, G., Pany, K., & Wheeler, S. (1989). Auditor reporting decisions involving accounting principle changes: Some evidence on materiality thresholds. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(1), 78–96.
Cohen, D., Dey, A., & Lys, T. (2008). Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-Sarbanes Oxley periods. The Accounting Review, 82(3), 757–787.
Cook, K. A., Huston, G. R., & Omer, T. C. (2008). Earnings management through effective tax rates: The effects of tax planning investment and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 447–471.
Das, S., Levine, C. B., & Sivaramakrishan, K. (1998). Earnings predictability and bias in analyst’ earnings forecasts’. The Accounting Review, 73(2), 277–294.
Davis, L. R., Soo, B. S., & Trompeter, G. M. (2009). Auditor tenure and the ability to meet or beat earnings forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(2), 517–548.
Dechow, P., & Skinner, D. (2000). Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14(2), 235–250.
Degeorge, F., Patel, J., & Zechhauser, R. (1999). Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business, 72(1), 1–33.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Gleason, C. A., & Mills, L. F. (2004). Last-chance earnings management: Using the tax expense to meet analysts’ forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 431–459.
Fama, E., & French, K. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 153–193.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (1975). Materiality. Discussion Memorandum. Stamford, CT: FASB.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (1980). Qualitative characteristics of accounting information. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2. Stamford, CT: FASB.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2008). The hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
Fisher, M. H. (1990). The effects of reporting auditor materiality levels publicly, privately, or not at all in an experimental setting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 8(suppl), 184–223.
Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467–496.
Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., & Nelson, K. K. (2002). The relation between auditors’ fees and for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77(Suppl), 71–105.
Friedberg, A. H., Strawser, J. R., & Cassidy, J. H. (1989). Factors affecting materiality judgments: A comparison of “Big Eight” accounting firms’ materiality with the results of empirical research. Advances in Accounting, 7, 187–201.
Gleason, C. A., & Mills, L. F. (2002). Materiality and contingent tax liability reporting. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 317–342.
Gleason, C. A., & Mills, L. F. (2008). Evidence of differing market responses to beating analyst’ targets through tax expense decreases. Review of Accounting Studies, 13, 295–318.
Graham, J., Harvey, C., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1), 3–73.
Haka, S., Friedman, L., & Jones, V. (1986). Functional fixation and interference theory. The Accounting Review, 61(3), 455–474.
Hayn, C. (1995). The information content of losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(2), 125–153.
Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383.
Holstrum, G. L., & Messier, W. F. (1982). A review and integration of empirical research on materiality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 2(1), 45–63.
Icerman, R. C., & Hillison, W. A. (1991). Disposition of audit-detected errors: Some evidence on evaluative materiality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2(1), 45–63.
Jennings, M., Kneer, D. C., & Reckers, P. M. J. (1987). A reexamination of the concept of materiality: Views of auditors, users and officers of the court. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 6(2), 104–115.
Kasznik, R., & McNichols, M. (2002). Does Meeting expectations matter: evidence from analyst revisions and share prices. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(3), 727–759.
Krogstad, J. L., Ettenson, R. T., & Shanteau, J. (1984). Context and experience in auditor’s materiality judgments. Auditing A Journal of Practice and Theory, 4(1), 54–74.
Levitt, A. (1998). The numbers game. Remarks delivered at the NYU Center for Law and Business. New York, NY.
Li, H., Pincus, M., & Rego, S. (2008). Market reaction to events surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and earnings management. Journal of Law and Economics, 51(1), 111–134.
Libby, R., & Kinney, W. R., Jr. (2000). Does mandated audit communication reduce opportunistic corrections to manage earnings to forecast? The Accounting Review, 75(4), 383–404.
Lopez, T. J., & Rees, L. (2002). The effect of beating and missing analysts’ forecasts on the information content of unexpected earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 17(2), 155–184.
Martinov, N., & Roebuck, P. (1998). The assessment and integration of materiality and inherent risk: An analysis of major firms’ audit practices. International Journal of Auditing, 2(2), 103–126.
Matsumoto, D. A. (2002). Management’s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 483–514.
McNichols, M., & Wilson, G. P. (1988). Evidence of earnings management from the provision for bad debts. Journal of Accounting Research, 26(suppl), 1–31.
McVay, S., Nagar, V., & Tang, V. W. (2006). Trading Incentives to meet the analyst forecast. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(4), 575–598.
Messier, W. F., Martinov-Bennie, N., & Eilifsen, A. (2005). A review and integration of empirical research on materiality: Two decades later. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 24(2), 153–187.
Moyer, S. (1990). Capital adequacy ratios regulations and accounting choices in commercial banks. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12 or 13?: 123–154.
Nelson, M. W., Elliott, J. A., & Tarpley, R. L. (2003). How are earnings managed? Examples from Auditors. Accounting Horizons (suppl): 17–35.
Nelson, M. W., Smith, S. D., & Palmrose, Z. V. (2005). The effect of quantitative materiality approach on auditors’ adjustment approaches. The Accounting Review, 80(3), 897–920.
Ng, T. B.-P., & Tan, H.-T. (2003). Effects of authoritative guidance availability and audit committee effectiveness on auditors’ judgments in an auditor-client negotiation context. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 801–818.
Ng, T. B.-P., & Tan, H.-T. (2007). Effects of qualitative factor salience, expressed client concern, and qualitative materiality thresholds on auditors’ audit adjustment decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(4), 1171–1192.
Petroni, K. R. (1992). Optimistic reporting in the property casualty insurance industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15, 488–508.
Reichelt, K. J., & Wang, D. (2010). National and office-specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(3), 647–686.
Robinson, C., & Fertuck, L. (1985). Materiality: An empirical study of actual auditor decisions. Research Monograph Number 12. Vancouver, British Columbia: The Canadian Certified General Accountants’ Research Foundation.
Securities and Exchange Commission. (1999). Materiality. SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99. August 12. Washington, D.C: SEC.
Skinner, D. J., & Sloan, R. G. (2002). Earnings surprises, growth expectations, and stock returns or don’t let and earnings torpedo sink your portfolio. Review of Accounting Studies, 7(2/3), 289–312.
Steinbart, P. J. (1987). The construction of a rule-based expert system as a method for studying materiality judgments. The Accounting Review, 62(1), 97–116.
United States Supreme Court. (1976). TSC Industries v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438, 449.
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Wheeler, S., Pany, K., & Chewning, E. (1993). Inter-firm differences in propensities to modify audit opinions for pre-SAS No. 58 accounting principle changes. Accounting Horizons, 7(3), 46–54.
Wright, A., & Wright, S. (1997). An examination of the factors affecting the decision to waive audit adjustments. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 12(1), 15–36.