A reflective analysis of the “new audit” and the public interest

Emerald - Tập 6 Số 3 - Trang 300-329 - 2010
Timothy J. Fogarty1, John T. Rigsby2
1Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
2Adkerson School of Accountancy, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposePrior to the sudden collapse of large companies following the turn of the century and the implication that the auditing of these enterprises had failed, the large public accounting firms sought to re‐engineer the audit. A comprehension attempt to convert that which had been designed as a social good into one more aligned with a commercial logic was halted by the legislative response to this departure from classic professionalism. Recent developments suggest that change in this direction is regrouping. The purpose of this paper is to provide a reflective analysis of the thoughts of the authors on the early development of the new audit approach.Design/methodology/approachMost of the information in the piece was garnered from conversations with public accounting partners during the era in question. Logical argumentation derived from the academic and theoretical literature is the primary method.FindingsAttributes of the firms' strategies during this period are outlined. Features of the new audit are developed, especially as they vary from the traditional audit. These techniques and approaches are analyzed in terms of their ability to serve the public interest. This paper argues that motivating factors of the new audit will continue to be a force even in the more hostile regulatory environment of today.Practical implicationsAn appreciation of the findings of the study is useful in maintaining a level of skepticism about changes to the audit that are advocated by audit firms. Users of audit services, regulators, and legislators would benefit from an appreciation of the recent past. The motivating factors underlying these changes to audit environment continue to operate over time as the social purposes of the audit are less likely to be converted by the firms to ones that can be commercially exploited.Originality/valueThe study contributes insights into the origins of the new business audit approach and related strengths and limitations. These factors should be considered as the approach is developed and moves forward into the future in order for the audit approach to be effective in performing its social functions.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abbott, A. (1988), The System of Professions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Arnold, P. (2005), “Disciplining domestic regulation: the world trade organization and the market for professional services”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 299‐330. Baker, C. (1993), “Self‐regulation in the public accounting profession: the structural response of the large public accounting firms to a changing environment”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 68‐80. Bedard, J. (1989), “An archival investigation of audit planning”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 57‐71. Bell, T., Marrs, F., Solomon, I. and Thomas, I. (1997), Auditing Organizations Through a Strategic Systems Lens, KPMG LLP, Montvale, NJ. Boynton, W., Johnson, R. and Kell, W. (2001), Modern Auditing, 7th ed., Wiley, New York, NY. Braun, R. (2000), “The effect of time pressure on auditor attention to qualitative aspects of misstatements indicative of potential fraudulent financial reporting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 243‐59. Brint, S. (1994), In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Caramanis, C. (2002), “The interplay between professional groups, the state and supranational agents: Pax American in the age of ‘globilisation’”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 27 Nos 4/5, pp. 379‐408. Carcello, J. and Palmrose, Z. (1994), “Auditor litigation and modified reporting on bankrupt client”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 1‐30. Chandler, R. and Edwards, J. (1996), “Recurring issues in auditing: back to the future?”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 4‐29. Citron, D. (2003), “The UK's framework approach to auditor independence and the commercialization of the accounting profession”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 244‐74. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (1992), Internal Control – An Integrated Framework, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Jersey City, NJ. Cooper, D. and Robson, T. (2006), “Accounting, professions and regulation: locating sites of professionalism”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31 Nos 4/5, pp. 415‐44. Cooper, D., Greenwood, R., Hinings, B. and Brown, J. (1998), “Globalization and nationalism in a multinational accounting firm: the case of opening new markets in Eastern Europe”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23 Nos 5/6, pp. 531‐48. Covaleski, M., Dirsmith, M. and Rittenberg, L. (2003), “Jurisdictional disputes over professional work: the institutionalization of the global knowledge expert”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 323‐56. Cullinan, C. and Sutton, S. (2002), “Defrauding the public interest: a critical examination of reengineered audit processes and the likelihood of detecting fraud”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 297‐310. Curtis, E. and Turley, S. (2007), “The business risk audit – a longitudinal case study of an audit engagement”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 32 Nos 4/5, pp. 439‐61. DeFond, M. and Francis, J. (2005), “Audit research after Sarbanes‐Oxley”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 24, pp. 5‐30. Dillard, J., Rigsby, J. and Goodman, C. (2004), “The making and remaking of organizational context: duality and the institutionalization process”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 506‐42. Eilifsen, A., Knechel, W. and Wallage, P. (2001), “Application of the business risk audit model: a field study”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 193‐207. Elliott, R. and Jacobson, P. (1997), “Adding value to audits”, CA Magazine, November, pp. 35‐7. Fischer, M. (1996), “‘Realizing’ the benefits of new technologies as a source of audit evidence: an interpretive field study”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21 Nos 2/3, pp. 219‐42. Flint, D. (1988), Philosophy and Principles of Auditing – An Introduction, Macmillan, London. Fogarty, T., Heian, J. and Knutson, D. (1991), “The rationality of doing ‘nothing’: auditors' responses to legal liability in an institutionalized environment”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 201‐26. Fogarty, T., Radcliffe, V. and Campbell, D. (2006), “Accountancy before the fall: the AICPA vision project and related professional enterprises”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 1‐25. Francis, J. (1994), “Auditing, hermeneutics, and subjectivity”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 235‐69. Francis, J. (2004), “What do we know about audit quality?”, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 345‐68. Free, C., Salterio, S. and Shearer, T. (2009), “The construction of auditability: MBA rankings and assurance in practice”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 119‐40. Friedson, E. (2001), Professionalism: The Third Logic, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Gill, M. (2009), Accountants' Truth: Knowledge and Ethics in the Financial World, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Greenwood, R. and Suddaby, R. (2006), “Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the Big Five accounting firms”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 27‐48. Hanlon, G. (1994), The Commercialization of Accountancy: Flexible Accumulation and the Transformation of the Service Class, Macmillan, London. Hechter, M. (2008), “The rise and fall of normative control”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 663‐76. Herwitz, D. and Barrett, M. (2004), Accounting for Lawyers, 2004 Supplement, 3rd ed., Foundation Press, New York, NY. Hopwood, A. (1998), “Exploring the modern audit firm: an introduction”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23 Nos 5/6, pp. 515‐6. Hopwood, A. (2009), “The economic crisis and accounting: implications for the research community”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 34 Nos 6/7, pp. 797‐802. Houghton, K. and Jubb, C. (2003), “The market for financial report audits: regulation of and competition for auditor independence”, Law & Policy, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 299‐321. Humphrey, C. and Moizer, P. (1990), “From techniques to ideologies: an alternative perspective on the audit function”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 217‐38. Humphrey, C., Loft, A. and Woods, M. (2009), “The global audit profession and the international financial architecture: understanding regulatory relationships at a time of financial crisis”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 34 Nos 6/7, pp. 810‐25. Jeppesen, K. (1998), “Reinventing auditing, redefining consulting and independence”, The European Accounting Review, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 517‐39. Khalifa, R., Sharma, N., Humphrey, C. and Robson, K. (2007), “Discourse and audit change: transformations in methodology in the professional field audit field”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 825‐54. Knechel, W. (2007), “The business risk audit: origins, obstacles and opportunities”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 32 Nos 4/5, pp. 383‐408. Lee, T. (1993), Corporate Audit Theory, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY. Lemon, W., Tatum, K. and Turley, W. (2000), Developments in the Audit Methodologies of Large Audit Firms, ABG Publications, London. Levitt, A. (1998), “The numbers game”, speech given at the New York University Center for Law and Business, New York, NY, September 28. Loft, A., Humphrey, C. and Turley, S. (2006), “In pursuit of global regulation: changing governance and accountability structures at the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 428‐51. Lounsbury, M. (2008), “Institutional rationality and practice variation: new directions in the institutional analysis of practice”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 33 Nos 4/5, pp. 349‐61. McMillan, K. (2004), “Trust and the virtues: a solution to the accounting scandals?”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 15 Nos 6/7, pp. 943‐53. McNair, C. (1991), “Proper compromises: the management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16 No. 7, pp. 635‐53. Macintosh, N. and Shearer, T. (2000), “The accounting profession today: a poststructuralist critique”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 607‐26. Malsch, B. and Gendron, Y. (2009), “Mythical representations of trust in auditors and the preservation of social order in the financial community”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 735‐50. Mathiason, N. (2009), “Investors go to court to call the sleeping giants to account”, The Observer, October 25. Mautz, R. and Sharaf, H. (1961), The Philosophy of Auditing, American Accounting Association, Sarasota, FL. Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1991), “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony”, in Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P. (Eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 41‐62. Morris, T. and Empson, L. (1998), “Organization and expertise: an exploration of knowledge bases and the management of accounting and consulting firms”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23 Nos 5/6, pp. 609‐24. O'Connell, B. (2004), “Enron. Con: ‘He that filches from me my good name…makes me poor indeed’”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 15 Nos 6/7, pp. 733‐49. Palmrose, Z. (1988), “An analysis of auditor litigation and auditor service quality”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 55‐73. Pentland, B. (1993), “Getting comfortable with the numbers: auditing and the micro‐production of macro‐order”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 605‐20. Powell, M., Brock, D. and Hinings, C. (1999), “The changing professional organization”, in Brock, D., Powell, M. and Hinings, C.R. (Eds), Restructuring the Professional Organization, Routledge, London, pp. 1‐19. Power, M. (1995), “Auditing, expertise and the sociology of technique”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 317‐39. Power, M. (1997), The Audit Society Rituals of Verification, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Power, M. (2003), “Auditing and the production of legitimacy”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 379‐94. Power, M. (2007), “Business risk auditing – debating the history of its present”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 32 Nos 4/5, pp. 379‐82. Psaros, J. (1987), “Detection of fraud: in defense of the auditor”, The CA in Australia, March, pp. 43‐5. Raar, J. (2009), “The new global accounting community: rationale for dialogue to establish its accountability”, Critical Perspectives in Accounting, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 509‐27. Reiter, S. and Williams, P. (2004), “The philosophy and rhetoric of auditor independence concepts”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 355‐76. Richardson, A. (2009), “Regulatory networks for accounting and auditing standards: a social network analysis of Canadian and international standard‐setting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 571‐88. Robson, K., Humphrey, C., Khalifa, R. and Jones, J. (2007), “Transforming audit technologies: business risk audit methodologies and the audit field”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 32 Nos 4/5, pp. 409‐38. Robson, K., Willmott, H., Cooper, D. and Puxty, T. (1994), “The ideology of professional regulation and the markets for accounting labour: three episodes in the recent history of the UK accountancy profession”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 527‐53. Shafer, W. and Gendron, Y. (2005), “Analysis of a failed jurisdictional claim: the rhetoric and politics surrounding the AICPA global credential project”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 453‐91. Silvers, D. (2007), “The current state of auditing as a profession: a view from workers‐owners”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 437‐44. Solomon, I. and Trotman, K. (2003), “Experimental judgment and decision research in auditing: the first 25 years of AOS”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 395‐412. Stevens, M. (1991), The Big Six: The Selling Out of America's Top Accounting Firms, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY. Suddaby, R., Cooper, D. and Greenwood, R. (2007), “Transnational regulation of professional services: governance dynamics of field level organizational change”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 32 Nos 4/5, pp. 333‐62. Suddaby, R., Gendron, Y. and Lam, H. (2009), “The organizational context of professionalism in accounting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Nos 3/4, pp. 409‐27. Tonge, S. and Wootton, C. (1991), “Auditor concentration and competition among the large public accounting firms”, Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 157‐72. Willmott, H. (1990), “Serving the public interest? A critical analysis of a professional claim”, in Cooper, D. and Hopper, T. (Eds), Critical Accounts, Macmillan, London, pp. 315‐31. Willmott, H. and Sikka, P. (1997), “On the commercialization of accounting thesis: a review essay”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 831‐42. Willmott, H., Cooper, D. and Puxty, T. (1993), “Maintaining self‐regulation: making ‘interests’ coincide in discourses on the governance of the ICAEW”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 68‐93. Windsor, C. and Warming‐Rasmussen, B. (2009), “The rise of regulatory capitalism and the decline of auditor independence: a critical and experimental examination of auditors' conflicts of interests”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 267‐88. Wright, S. and Wright, A. (1997), “The effect of industry experience on hypothesis generation and audit planning decision”, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 9, pp. 273‐94. Zeff, S. (2003a), “How the US accounting profession got where it is today: Part I”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 189‐205. Zeff, S. (2003b), “How the US accounting profession got where it is today: Part II”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 267‐86.
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 6 Số 3

300-329

Thông tin tác giả