Early Childhood Teachers at the Center: A Qualitative Case Study of Professional Development in an Urban District
Tóm tắt
Professional development for early childhood educators (ECE PD) is an essential component of supporting a professional early childhood workforce. Yet research on ECE PD frequently centers on narrow fidelity data, while teachers’ individual voices and teaching contexts are only rarely considered in order to understand teacher experiences with PD initiatives. This qualitative case study utilizes the critical ecology of the early childhood profession framework (Miller et al., Early childhood grows up: Towards a critical ecology of the profession, Springer, London) to examine process-related questions in a large urban district’s PD initiative connected with the launch of a new district-developed kindergarten curriculum. Examining teacher experiences through an ecological lens, the study focuses on two kindergarten teachers, viewing them as active agents in their own professional learning and situating them within their particular teaching contexts. Data sources included classroom observations, teacher interviews, and curriculum fidelity data. Although fidelity data provided some information about teacher responses to the PD, triangulating this data with teacher accounts of adapting the curriculum to their particular context enabled more nuanced understandings about how teachers adapt information from PD sessions to their particular teaching contexts. This study demonstrates the need for research on ECE PD to go beyond fidelity data to explore process-related questions about teachers PD experiences.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baker, M. (2013, August). Theory, research, and rationale behind the Focus on K2 curriculum. Boston Public Schools Department of Early Childhood. Retrieved from http://bpsearlychildhood.weebly.com/uploads/1/0/1/3/10131776/focus_on_k2_literature_review_final.pdf.
Barnett, W. S., Carolan, M. E., Squires, J. H., & Clarke Brown, K. (2013). The state of preschool 2013: State preschool yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.
Boston Public Schools Department of Early Childhood (2014). Introducing Focus on K2. Retrieved from: http://bpsearlychildhood.weebly.com/introduction.html.
Boston Public Schools (2015). Boston Public Schools at a glance. Retrieved from http://www.bostonpublicschools.org/cms/lib07/MA01906464/Centricity/Domain/4/BPS%20at%20a%20Glance%2015-1109.pdf.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments in nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Catapano, S. (2005). Teacher professional development through children’s project work. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(4), 261–267.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). The new teacher education: For better or for worse? Educational Researcher, 34(7), 3–17.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationship of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–306.
Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd edn.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Davies, H., & Head, C. (2010). Pedagogical exchange for professional development: Reflections on how collaboration has inspired and empowered a group of early years educators to find new ways of working to improve learning and teaching. International Journal of Learning, 17(9), 339–352.
Erickson, F. (2005). Arts, humanities and sciences in educational research and social engineering in federal education policy. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 4–9.
Gee, J. (2005). It’s theories all the way down: A response to scientific research in education. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 10–18.
Guitérrez, K., & Penuel, W. (2014). Relevance to practice as a criterion for rigor. Educational Researcher, 43(1), 19–23.
Helm, J. H., & Katz, L. G. (2010). Young investigators: The project approach in the early years (2nd edn.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Howes, C., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2012). Effective early childhood professional development: Improving teacher practice and child outcomes. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Katz, L., & Chard, S. (2000). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach (2nd edn.). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
Kragler, S., Martin, L., & Kroeger, D. (2008). Money down the drain: Mandated professional development. Journal of School Leadership, 18, 528–550.
Lather, P., & Moss, P. (2005). Introduction: Implications of the scientific research in education report for qualitative inquiry. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 1–3.
Lieber, J., Butera, G., Hanson, M., Palmer, S., Horn, E., Czaja, C., Diamond, K., Goodman Jansen, G., Daniels, J., Gupta, S., & Odom, S. (2009). Factors that influence the implementation of a new preschool curriculum: Implications for professional development. Early Education and Development, 20(3), 456–481.
Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2012). Program evaluation and practice. New York: Guilford Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miller, L., Dalli, C., & Urban, M. (2012). Early childhood grows up: Towards a critical ecology of the profession. London: Springer.
Moss, P. (2008). The democratic and reflective professional: Reforming and rethinking the early years workforce. In L. Miller & C. Cable (Eds.), Professionalism in the early years (pp. 121–130). Oxon: Hodder Education.
National Research Council (2002). Scientific research in education. In R. J. Shavelson, & L. Towne (Eds.), Committee on scientific principles for educational research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Neuman, S. B. (2010). The research we have; The research we need. In S. Neuman & M. Kamil (Eds.), Preparing teachers for the early childhood classroom: Proven models and key principles (pp. 221–236). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Neuman, S. B., & Kamil, M. L. (Eds.). (2010). Preparing teachers for the early childhood classroom: proven models and key principles. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Opfer, D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407.
Pearson Education (2008). Scott Foresman reading street. Lebanon, IN: Pearson.
Powell, D., & File, N. (2008). Project approach: Purdue University and University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (Wisconsin site). In Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Consortium, Effects of preschool curriculum programs on school readiness (NCER 2008–2009) (pp. 143–152). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Rudolph, J. (2014). Why understanding science matters: The IES research guidelines as a case in point. Educational Researcher, 43(1), 15–18.
Shore, R. (2012). Professional development for early childhood education: A national perspective. NHSA Dialog, 15(1), 1–7.
Snyder, P., Hemmeter, M. L., Meeker, K. A., Kinder, K., Pasia, C., & McLaughlin, T. (2012). Characterizing key features of the early childhood professional development literature. Infants and Young Children, 25(3), 188–212.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
U.S Departments of Education and Health and Human Services (2016). High-quality early learning settings depend on a high-quality workforce: Low compensation undermines quality. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/earlylearning/files/ece-low-compensation-undermines-quality-report-2016.pdf.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Zaslow, M., & Martinez-Beck, I. (2006). Critical issues in early childhood professional development. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Zaslow, M., Tout, K., Halle, T., Whittaker, J. & Lavelle, B. (2010). Towards the identification of features of effective early childhood professional development: A review of the literature. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service, Washington, DC.