Can household mobility solve basic environmental problems?

International Tax and Public Finance - Tập 2 - Trang 245-260 - 1995
Dietmar Wellisch1
1Department of Economics, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Tóm tắt

The paper studies the role of household mobility for efficiency of decentralized environmental policy. Pollutants may travel across regional boundaries, and regions can influence their capital income from abroad as well as the rent outflow to nonresidents by means of their environmental policy. Different degrees of interregional household mobility are analyzed within this framework. While regional governments internalize all externalities in their own self-interest in the case of perfect household mobility, only a region that voluntarily makes an interregional transfer to the other region has incentives to internalize interregional externalities if households are imperfectly mobile.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baumol, W.W., and W.E. Oates. (1988).The Theory of Environmental Policy (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Boadway, R.W. (1982). “On the Method of Taxation and the Provision of Local Public Goods: A Comment.”American Economic Review 72, 846–851. Bukovetsky, S. (1993). “Rent Seeking and Tax Competition.” Mimeo: Department of Economics, York University. Burbidge, J.B., and G.M. Myers. (1994a). “Population Mobility and Capital Tax Competition.”Regional Science and Urban Economics 24, 441–459. Burbidge, J.B., and G.M. Myers. (1994b). “Population Mobility and Capital Tax Competition.”Journal of Urban Economics. Coase, R. (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost.”Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1–44. DePalma, A., and Y.Y. Papageorgiou. (1988). “Heterogeneity in Tastes and Urban Structure.”Regional Science and Urban Economics 18, 37–56. Gordon, R.H. (1983). “An Optimal Taxation Approach to Fiscal Federalism.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 567–586. Mansoorian, A., and G.M. Myers. (1993). “Attachment to Home and Efficient Purchases of Population in a Fiscal Externality Economy.”Journal of Public Economics 52, 117–132. Myers, G.M. (1990). “Optimality, Free Mobility, and the Regional Authority in a Federation.”Journal of Public Economics 43, 107–121. Oates, W.E. (1972).Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Oates, W.E., and R.M. Schwab. (1988). “Economic Competition Among Jurisdictions: Efficiency Enhancing or Distortion Inducing?”Journal of Public Economics 35, 333–354. Oates, W.E., and R.M. Schwab. (1989). “The Theory of Regulatory Federalism: The Case of Environmental Management.” University of Maryland. Richter, W.F., and D. Wellisch. (1995). “The Provision of Local Public Goods and Factors in the Presence of Firm and Household Mobility.”Journal of Public Economics, forthcoming. Sandmo, A., and D.E. Wildasin. (1994). “Taxation, Migration and Pollution.” Vanderbilt University. Wellisch, D. (1994). “Interregional Spillovers in the Presence of Perfect and Imperfect Household Mobility.”Journal of Public Economics 55, 167–184. Wellisch, D. (1995a).Dezentrale Finanzpolitik bei hoher Mobilität. Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck). Wellisch, D. (1995b). “Locational Choices of Firms and Decentalized Environmental Policies with Various Instruments.”Journal of Urban Economics, forthcoming. Wildasin, D.E. (1986).Urban Public Finance. New York: Harwood. Wildasin, D.E. (1988). “Nash Equilibria in Models of Fiscal Competition.”Journal of Public Economics 35, 229–240.