Threshold values of physical performance tests for locomotive syndrome

Journal of Orthopaedic Science - Tập 18 - Trang 618-626 - 2013
Akio Muramoto1, Shiro Imagama1, Zenya Ito1, Kenichi Hirano2, Ryoji Tauchi1, Naoki Ishiguro1, Yukiharu Hasegawa1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

Tóm tắt

Our previous study determined which physical performance tests were the most useful for evaluating locomotive syndrome. Our current study establishes reference values for these major physical performance tests with regards to diagnosing and assessing risk of locomotive syndrome (LS). We measured timed-up-and-go test, one-leg standing time, back muscle strength, grip strength, 10-m gait time and maximum stride in 406 individuals (167 men, 239 women) between the ages of 60–88 years (mean 68.8 ± 6.7 years) during Yakumo Study 2011-12. The LS was defined as having a score of >16 points on the 25-Question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25). The reference value of each physical test was determined using receiver operating characteristics analysis. Women had a significantly higher prevalence of LS than men did and also scored significantly higher on the GLFS-25: women, 9.2 ± 10.3 pts; men, 6.7 ± 8.0 pts. Both genders in the non-LS group performed significantly better in all physical performance test gender except for back muscle strength in men and grip strength in both genders than those in the LS group, even after adjusting for age. The results of all the physical performance tests correlated significantly with the GLFS-25 scores of both genders even after adjusting for age except for grip strength. Reference values for TUG, one-leg standing time, back muscle strength, 10-m gait time, maximum stride and grip strength in men were 6.7 s, 21 s, 78 kg, 5.5 s and, 119 cm and 34 kg, respectively, and those for women were 7.5 s, 15 s, 40 kg, 6.2 s, 104 cm, and 22 kg, respectively. We established reference values for major physical performance tests used when assessing locomotive syndrome as defined by the GLFS-25. Our results can be used to characterize physical function and to help tailor an anti-LS training program for each individual.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Freedman VA, Crimmins E, Schoeni RF, Spillman BC, Aykan H, Kramarow E,Land K, Lubitz J,Manton K, Martin LG, Shinberg D, Waidmann t. Resolving inconsistencies in trends in old-age disability: Report from a technical working group. Demography 2004;41:417–41. Nakamura K. A “super-aged” society and the “locomotive syndrome”. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13:1–2. Nakamura K. The concept and treatment of locomotive syndrome: its acceptance and spread in Japan. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16:489–91. Nakamura K. Guidebook on locomotive syndrome. Tokyo: Bunkodo; 2010. Sasaki E, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Ono A, Yamamoto Y, Inoue R. Evaluation of locomotive disability using loco-check: a cross-sectional study in the Japanese general population. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18:121–9. Seichi A, Hoshino Y, Doi T, Akai M, Tobimatsu Y, Iwaya T. Development of a screening tool for risk of locomotive syndrome in the elderly: the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function. J Orthop Sci. 2012;17:163–72. Muramoto A, Imagama S, Ito Z, Hirano K, Ishiguro N, Hasegawa Y. Physical performance tests are useful for evaluating and monitoring the severity of locomotive syndrome. J Orthop Sci. 2012;17:782–8. Hoshino Y, Seichi A. Development of diagnostic-tool for locomotivesyndrome. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 2011;85:12–20 (in Japanese). Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–8. Rikli R, Busch S. Motor performance of women as a function of age and physical activity level. J Gerontol. 1986;41:645–9. Hirano K, Imagama S, Hasegawa Y, Ito Z, Muramoto A, Ishiguro N. The influence of locomotive syndrome on health-related quality of life in a community-living population. Mod Rheumatol. 2012 Sep 21 (Epub ahead of print). Kamide N, Takahashi K, Shiba Y. Reference values for the Timed Up and Go test in healthy Japanese elderly people: determination using the methodology of meta-analysis. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2011;11:445–51. Yoshimura N, Oka H, Muraki S, Nakamura K. Reference values for hand grip strength, muscle mass, walking time, and one-leg standing time as indices for locomotive syndrome and associated disability: the second survey of the ROAD study. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16:768–77. Potter JM, Evans AL, Duncan G. Gait speed and activities of daily living function in geriatric-patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:997–9. Kim MJ, Yabushita N, Kim MK, Matsuo T, Okuno J, Tanaka K. Alternative items for identifying hierarchical levels of physical disability by using physical performance tests in women aged 75 years and older. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010;10:302–10. Sato T, Demura S, Murase T, Kobayashi Y. Contribution of physical fitness component to health status in middle-aged and elderly females. J Physiol Anthropol. 2007;26:569–77. Wennie Huang W-N, Perera S, Van Swearingen J, Studenski S. Performance measures predict onset of activity of daily living difficulty in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:844–52. Islam MM, Nasu E, Rogers ME, Koizumi D, Rogers NL, Takeshima N. Effects of combined sensory and muscular training on balance in Japanese older adults. Prev Med. 2004;39:1148–55. Gawron W, Pospiech L, Orendorz-Fraczkowska K, Noczynska A. The influence of metabolic disturbances present in diabetes mellitus type I on vestibulo-spinal reflexes in children and young adults. Otolaryngol Pol. 2002;56:451–7. Giorgetti MM, Harris BA, Jette A. Reliability of clinical balance outcome measures in the elderly. Physiother Res Int. 1998;3:274–83. Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Penninx B, Nicklas BJ, Simonsick EM, Newman AB, Tylavsky FA, Brach JS, Satterfield S, Bauer DC, Visser M, Rubin SM, Harris TB, Pahor M. Prognostic value of usual gait speed in well-functioning older people-results from the health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1675–80. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, Leveille SG, Markides KS, Ostir GV, Studenski S, Berkman LF, Wallace RB. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55:M221–31. Shinkai S, Watanabe S, Kumagai S, Fujiwara Y, Amano H, Yoshida H, Ishizaki T, Yukawa H, Suzuki T, Shibata H. Walking speed as a good predictor for the onset of functional dependence in a Japanese rural community population. Age Ageing. 2000;29:441–6. Cho BL, Scarpace D, Alexander NB. Tests of stepping as indicators of mobility, balance, and fall risk in balance-impaired older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:1168–73. Imagama S, Matsuyama Y, Hasegawa Y, Sakai Y, Ito Z, Ishiguro N, Hamajima N. Back muscle strength and spinal mobility are predictors of quality of life in middle-aged and elderly males. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:954–61. Hirano K, Imagama S, Hasegawa Y, Wakao N, Muramoto A, Ishiguro N. Effect of back muscle strength and sagittal spinal imbalance on locomotive syndrome in Japanese men. Orthopedics. 2012;35:e1073–8. Richards L, Palmiter-Thomas P. Grip strength measurement: a critical review of tools, methods, and clinical utility. Phys Rehabil Med. 1996;8:87–109.