Internet reporting in microfinance institutions
Tóm tắt
This paper aims to present research on how and why microfinance institutions (MFIs) disclose financial and social information on the internet. Legitimacy theory provides the theoretical framework.
The empirical study analysed factors influencing MFIs to publish financial and social information on the internet. The model was tested using regression analysis. The sample consisted of publicly available data from the web sites of 273 MFIs.
The study found that MFIs' internet presence overall is scarce and that greater levels of disclosure are needed. It was found that large MFIs with a high degree of public exposure on the internet disclose greater amounts of information on their web sites than smaller MFIs with a low degree of public exposure. It was also found that for‐profit MFIs disclose more financial information on their web sites, while non‐profit non‐governmental organisations (NGOs) reveal more social information.
MFIs should be proud to tell the world what they are doing. MFI managers need to remember that transparency increases funds from donors. Donors are mostly based in developed countries, so the internet plays a key role in disclosure and attracting potential donors. Thus, managers of MFIs are encouraged to increase disclosure levels – especially on the internet.
Academic research into the factors that influence MFIs' internet disclosure is still scarce. This is an important area of study because full disclosure offers enormous benefits. Since MFIs have a social mission, they are legitimated in the eyes of their donors by disclosing social information. Since they are also financial institutions, they have to show that they use the funds they receive efficiently.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abbey, E.M. (2008), “Constructive regulation of non‐government organizations”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, doi:10.1016/j.qref.2006.12.014(in press)..
Adams, C., Hill, W. and Roberts, C.B. (1998), “Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: legitimating corporate behaviour?”, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 1‐21.
Adams, D.W. and von Pischke, J.D. (1992), “Microenterprise credit programs: déjà vu”, World Development, Vol. 20 No. 10, pp. 1463‐70.
Aerts, W., Cormier, D. and Magnan, M. (2006), “Intra‐industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: an international perspective”, Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 299‐331.
Arun, T. (2005), “Regulating for development: the case of microfinance”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 45 Nos 2/3, pp. 346‐57.
Ashbaugh, H., Johnstone, K.M. and Warfield, T.D. (1999), “Corporate reporting on the internet”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 241‐58.
Bhatt, N. (1997), “Microenterprise development and the entrepreneurial poor: including the excluded?”, Public Administration and Development, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 371‐86.
Bonsón‐Ponte, E., Escobar‐Rodríguez, T. and Flores‐Muñoz, F. (2006), “Online transparency of the banking sector”, Online Information Review, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 714‐30.
Brin, S. and Page, L. (1998), “The anatomy of a large‐scale hypertextual web search engine”, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, Vol. 30 Nos 1/7, pp. 107‐17.
Brock, J. and Zhou, Y. (2005), “Organizational use of the internet: scale development and validation”, Internet Research, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 67‐87.
Castelo, M. and Rodrigues, L. (2006), “Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: a legitimacy theory perspective”, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 232‐48.
Connolly, C. and Hyndman, N. (2004), “Performance reporting: a comparative study of British and Irish charities”, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 127‐54.
Cowen, S.S., Ferreri, L.B. and Parker, L.D. (1987), “The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency‐based analysis”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 111‐22.
Daley‐Harris, S. (2006), State of the Microcredit Summit Campaign Report 2006, Microcredit Summit Campaign, Washington, DC.
Debreceny, R., Gray, G.L. and Rahman, A. (2002), “The determinants of internet financial reporting”, Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, Vol. 21 Nos 4/5, pp. 371‐94.
Deegan, C. (2000), Financial Accounting Theory, McGraw‐Hill, Roseville, MA.
Diamond, D. and Verrecchia, R. (1991), “Disclosure, liquidity and the cost of capital”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, pp. 1325‐60.
Dixon, R., Ritchie, J. and Siwale, J. (2006), “Microfinance: accountability from the grassroots”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 405‐27.
Doupnik, T.S. and Salter, S.B. (1995), “External environment, culture, and accounting practice: a preliminary test of a general model of international accounting development”, International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 30, pp. 189‐207.
Drèze, X. and Zufryden, F. (2004), “Measurement of online visibility and its impact on internet traffic”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 20‐37.
Ebrahim, A. (2003), “Accountability in practice: mechanisms for NGOs”, World Development, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 813‐29.
Fritch, J.W. (2003), “Heuristics, tools, and systems for evaluating internet information: helping users assess a tangled web”, Online Information Review, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 321‐7.
Greuning, H., van Gallardo, J. and Randhawa, B. (1998), A Framework for Regulating Microfinance Institutions, The World Bank: Financial Sector Development Department, Washington, DC, December.
Gutiérrez‐Nieto, B. and Serrano‐Cinca, C. (2007), “Factors explaining the rating of microfinance institutions”, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 439‐64.
Gutiérrez‐Nieto, B., Serrano‐Cinca, C. and Mar‐Molinero, C. (2007), “Microfinance institutions and efficiency”, OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 131‐42.
Hackston, D. and Milne, M.J. (1996), “Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 77‐108.
Hartarska, V. (2005), “Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the newly independent states”, World Development, Vol. 33 No. 10, pp. 1627‐43.
Healy, P.M. and Palepu, K. (2001), “Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 31 Nos 1/3, pp. 405‐40.
Hulme, D. and Mosley, P. (1996), Finance Against Poverty, Routledge, London.
IASC (1990), Disclosures in Financial Statements of Banks and Similar Financial Institutions, IAS 30, International Accounting Standards Committee, London.
IASC (1995), Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation, IAS 32, International Accounting Standards Committee, London.
IASC (1997), Presentation of Financial Statements, IAS 1, International Accounting Standards Committee, London.
Jana, S. and Chatterjee, S. (2004), “Quantifying web‐site visits using web statistics: an extended cybermetrics study”, Online Information Review, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 191‐9.
Jones, M.J. and Xiao, J.Z. (2004), “Financial reporting on the internet by 2010: a consensus view”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 237‐63.
Karim, M.R. and Osada, M. (1998), “Dropping out: an emerging factor in the success of microcredit based poverty alleviation programs”, The Developing Economies, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 257‐88.
Lymer, A. (1999), “The internet and the future of corporate reporting in Europe”, The European Accounting Review, Vol. 8, pp. 289‐302.
Lymer, A., Debreceny, R., Gray, G.L. and Rahman, A. (1999), “Business reporting on the internet”, discussion paper, International Accounting Standards Committee, London.
Magness, V. (2006), “Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure. An empirical test of legitimacy theory”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 540‐63.
Morduch, J. (1999), “The role of subsidies in microfinance: evidence from the Grameen Bank”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 60 No. 1, pp. 229‐48.
Narayan, F.B., Godden, T., Reid, B. and Ortega, M.R. (2000), Financial Management and Governance Issues in Selected Developing Member Countries, Asian Development Bank, Manila.
Nelson, P. (2003), “Multilateral development banks, transparency and corporate clients: public‐private partnerships and public access to information”, Public Administration and Development, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 249‐57.
Newson, M. and Deegan, C. (2002), “Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea”, The International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 37, pp. 183‐213.
Nobes, C. (1998), “Towards a general model of the reasons for international differences in financial reporting”, Abacus, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 162‐87.
Nobes, C. and Parker, R. (1995), Comparative International Accounting, 4th ed., Prentice‐Hall, New York, NY.
Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD) (2003), White Paper on Corporate Governance in Latin America, OECD, Paris.
Patten, D.M. (1992), “Intra‐industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 17, pp. 471‐5.
Patten, D.M. (2002), “Give or take on the internet: an examination of the disclosure practices of insurance firm web innovators”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 36, pp. 247‐59.
Rosenberg, R., Mwangi, P., Christen, R.P. and Nasr, M. (2003), Microfinance Consensus Guidelines. Disclosure Guidelines for Financial Reporting by Microfinance Institutions, 2nd ed., Consultative Group to Assist the Poorest (CGAP), World Bank Group, Washington, DC.
Serrano‐Cinca, C., Fuertes‐Callén, Y. and Gutiérrez‐Nieto, B. (2007), “Online reporting by banks: a structural modelling approach”, Online Information Review, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 310‐32.
Serrano‐Cinca, C., Mar Molinero, C. and Chaparro, F. (2004), “Spanish savings banks: a view on intangibles”, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 103‐8.
Suchman, M.C. (1995), “Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 571‐610.
Tilling, M. (2004), “Communication at the edge: voluntary social and environmental reporting in the annual report of a legitimacy threatened corporation”, paper presented at the Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, Singapore, 4‐6 July.
Tsang, E. (2001), “Annual report disclosure and corporate legitimacy management: a study of Singapore companies responses to the governments call for venturing”, Abroad Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 18, pp. 27‐43.
Tucker, M. (2001), “Financial performance of selected microfinance institutions”, Journal of Microfinance, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 107‐23.
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (2003), Money and Politics Handbook: A Guide to Increasing Transparency in Emerging Democracies, Technical Publication Series, PN‐ACR‐223, Office of Democracy and Governance – Bureau for Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance, USAID, Washington, DC.
Verrecchia, R.E. (2001), “Essays on disclosure”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 32 Nos 1/3, pp. 97‐180.
Wilmshurst, D.W. and Frost, G.R. (2000), “Corporate environmental reporting. A test of legitimacy theory”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 10‐26.
Yaron, J. (1994), “What makes rural finance institutions successful?”, The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 49‐70.
Zeller, M., Sharma, M., Henry, C. and Lapenu, C. (2006), “An operational method for assessing the poverty outreach performance of development policies and projects. Results of case studies in Africa, Asia, and Latin America”, World Development, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 446‐64.
Zovatto, D. (2003), “The legal and practical characteristics of the funding of political parties and election campaigns in Latin America”, in Austin, R. and Tjernström, M. (Eds), Handbook on Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns, International IDEA, Stockholm.