Spinal cord injury: a review of the most-cited publications

European Spine Journal - Tập 26 - Trang 28-39 - 2016
Behdin Nowrouzi1, Aisha Assan-Lebbe2,3, Bhanu Sharma4,3, Jennifer Casole5,3, Behnam Nowrouzi-Kia5,3
1Laurentian University, Sudbury, Canada
2University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
3McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
4Toronto Rehab, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
5Loretto College, Toronto, Canada

Tóm tắt

The objective of this study was to identify and review the most-cited articles on spinal cord injury (SCI). Citation analyses showcase the relative influence of individual articles in a given field. In addition to distinguishing publications of particular quality and impact and well-developed areas of the literature, citation analyses allow for an understanding of the direction in which a field of research is headed. A multi-disciplinary bibliographic index was used to identify the 50 SCI articles with the most lifetime citations, and the 50 SCI articles with the highest annual citation rates. Studies were categorized into one of six categories based on their primary focus: treatment, pathology/natural history, predictor of outcome, methods, epidemiology, or assessment measure. We report that 40.0 and 56.0 % of SCI papers with the most lifetime citations and highest annual citation rates, respectively, were systematic reviews or meta-analyses, indicating that some of the most referenced papers in SCI are not primary publications. Further, there appears to be a greater international presence in SCI research. In the highest annual citation rate cohort, 14.0 % of papers were a product of international collaboration, 50.0 % were published by outside of the United States, and the average year of publication was 2005 ± 5.4; the comparable numbers for papers that comprised the highest lifetime citation cohort were, respectively, 8.0, 28.0 %, and 1998 ± 9.2. Treatment and pathology/natural history of SCI were a common research focus in both citation cohorts, consistent with ongoing efforts to better understand and manage this injury. This comprehensive review provides a cross-sectional summary and bibliometric analysis of some of the most influential literature in SCI, and compliments existing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in the field by establishing which areas of the literature are growing and which have been well developed.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ (2014) Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95(5):986–995 Hammell KW (2013) Spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Springer, Berlin World Health O (2003) Spinal cord injury: as many as 500 000 people suffer each year. 2003/12/02/undefined Post M, Van Leeuwen C (2012) Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord 50(5):382–389 Cao Y, Chen Y, DeVivo M (2011) Lifetime direct costs after spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 16(4):10–16 Pershouse KJ, Barker RN, Kendall MB, Buettner PG, Kuipers P, Schuurs SB, Amsters DI (2012) Investigating changes in quality of life and function along the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93(3):413–419 Middleton J, Dayton A, Walsh J, Rutkowski S, Leong G, Duong S (2012) Life expectancy after spinal cord injury: a 50-year study. Spinal Cord 50(11):803–811 Cripps R, Lee B, Wing P, Weerts E, Mackay J, Brown D (2011) A global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: towards a living data repository for injury prevention. Spinal Cord 49(4):493–501 Domingo A, Al-Yahya AA, Asiri Y, Eng JJ, Lam, Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Research Team T (2012) A systematic review of the effects of pharmacological agents on walking function in people with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 29(5):865–879 Tetzlaff W, Okon EB, Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Hill CE, Sparling JS, Plemel JR, Plunet WT, Tsai EC, Baptiste D, Smithson LJ (2011) A systematic review of cellular transplantation therapies for spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 28(8):1611–1682 Patsopoulos NA, Analatos AA, Ioannidis JP (2005) Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA 293(19):2362–2366 Ponce FA, Lozano AM (2010) Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part I: the 100 top-cited papers in neurosurgical journals: a review. J Neurosurg 112(2):223–232 Sharma B, Lawrence DW (2014) Top-cited articles in traumatic brain injury. Front Hum Neurosci 8:879–893 Harzing A-W (2007) Publish or Perish. 4.17.0 edn. Tarma Software Research Melbourne, Australia Harzing A-W (2010) Citation analysis across disciplines: the impact of different data sources and citation metrics. Harzing. http://www.harzing.com/publications/white-papers/citation-analysis-across-disciplines. Accessed May 30 2016 Haley SM, Osberg JS (1989) Kappa coefficient calculation using multiple ratings per subject: a special communication. Phys Ther 69(11):970–974. doi:10.1097/01241398-199205000-00054 StataCorp (2003) Stata statistical software: release 11. StataCorp LP, College Station Kwon BK, Okon E, Hillyer J, Mann C, Baptiste D, Weaver LC, Fehlings MG, Tetzlaff W (2011) A systematic review of non-invasive pharmacologic neuroprotective treatments for acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 28(8):1545–1588 Gomes-Osman J, Cortes M, Guest J, Pascual-Leone A (2016) A systematic review of experimental strategies aimed at improving motor function after acute and chronic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 33(5):425–438 Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel HD (2008) Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 59(5):830–837