Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory?
Tóm tắt
We consider the external validity of laboratory measures of risk attitude. Based on a large-scale experiment using a representative panel of the Dutch population, we test if these measures can explain two different types of behavior: (i) behavior in laboratory risky financial decisions, and (ii) behavior in naturally-occurring field behavior under risk (financial, health and employment decisions). We find that measures of risk attitude are related to behavior in laboratory financial decisions and the most complex measures are outperformed by simpler measures. However, measures of risk attitude are not related to risk-taking in the field, calling into question the methods currently used for the purpose of measuring actual risk preferences. We conclude that while the external validity of measures of risk attitude holds in closely related frameworks, this validity is compromised in more remote settings.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andersen, S., Harrison, G.W., Lau, M.I., & Rutström, E.E. (2008). Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica, 76(3), 583–618.
Andersen, S., Girolamo, A., & Harrison, G. (2014). Risk and time preferences of entrepreneurs: Evidence from a Danish field experiment. Theory and Decision, 77(3), 341–357.
Andreoni, J., & Harbaugh, W. (2009). Unexpected utility: Experimental tests of five key questions about preferences over risk. Working Paper University of Oregon, Dept of Economics.
Barseghyan, L., Molinari, F., O’Donoghue, T., & Teitelbaum, J.C. (2013). The nature of risk preferences: Evidence from insurance choices. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2499–2529.
Binswanger, H.P. (1980). Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 395–407.
Blais, A., & Weber, E. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (dospert) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47.
Caliendo, M., Fossen, F., & Kritikos, A.S. (2009). Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs—New evidence from an experimentally validated survey. Small Business Economics, 32, 153–167.
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2010). Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: an experiment. Economic Inquiry, 48(1), 133–146.
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M.A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1–8.
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Imas, A. (2013). Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 87, 43–51.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn.
Cohen, A., & Einav, L. (2007). Estimating risk preferences from deductible choice. American Economic Review, 97(3), 745–788.
Crosetto, P., & Filippin, A. (2013). The “bomb” risk elicitation task. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 47(1), 31–65.
Crosetto, P., & Filippin, A. (2016). A theoretical and experimental appraisal of four risk elicitation methods. Experimental Economics, 19(3), 613–641.
Deck, C., Lee, J., & Reyes, J. (2008). Risk attitudes in large stake gambles: Evidence from a game show. Applied Economics, 40(1), 41–52.
Deck, C., Lee, J., Reyes, J.A., & Rosen, C.C. (2013). A failed attempt to explain within subject variation in risk taking behavior using domain specific risk attitudes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 87, 1–24.
Ding, X., Hartog, J., & Sun, Y. (2010). Can we measure individual risk attitudes in a survey? IZA Discussion Paper No. 4807.
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G.G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550.
Dohmen, T.J., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G.G. (2005). Individual risk attitudes: New evidence from a large, representative, experimentally-validated survey. IZA Discussion Paper, 1730.
Drerup, T., Enke, B., & Von Gaudecker, H.-M. (2017). The precision of subjective data and the explanatory power of economic models. Journal of Econometrics, 200(2), 378–389.
Dulleck, U., Fooken, J., & Fell, J. (2015). Within-subject intra-and inter-method consistency of two experimental risk attitude elicitation methods. German Economic Review, 16(1), 104–121.
Eckel, C.C., & Grossman, P.J. (2008). Forecasting risk attitudes: an experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1), 1–17.
Egan, M., Matvos, G., & Seru, A. (2019). The market for financial adviser misconduct. Journal of Political Economy, 127(1), 233–295.
Fairley, K., & Weitzel, U. (2017). Ambiguity and risk measures in the lab and students’ real-life borrowing behavior. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 67, 85–98.
Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2018). Global evidence on economic preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(4), 1645–1692.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using g* power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
Franken, J.R., Pennings, J.M., & Garcia, P. (2017). Risk attitudes and the structure of decision-making: Evidence from the Illinois hog industry. Agricultural Economics, 48(1), 41–50.
Friedman, D., Isaac, R.M., James, D., & Sunder, S. (2014). Risky curves: On the empirical failure of expected utility. New York:Routledge.
Galizzi, M.M., Machado, S.R., & Miniaci, R. (2016). Temporal stability, cross-validity, and external validity of risk preferences measures: Experimental evidence from a Uk representative sample. Working Paper.
Galizzi, M.M., & Navarro-Martínez, D. (2019). On the external validity of social preference games: a systematic lab-field study. Management Science, 65 (3), 976–1002.
Gneezy, U., & Potters, J. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 631–645.
Guiso, L., & Paiella, M. (2008). Risk aversion, wealth, and background risk. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(6), 1109–1150.
Hanoch, Y., Johnson, J.G., & Wilke, A. (2006). Domain specificity in experimental measures and participant recruitment: an application to risk-taking behavior. Psychological Science, 17(4), 300–304.
Hardeweg, B., Menkhoff, L., & Waibel, H. (2013). Experimentally validated survey evidence on individual risk attitudes in rural Thailand. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 61(4), 859–888.
Harrison, G.W., & Rutström, E.E. (2008). Risk aversion in the laboratory. In Risk aversion in experiments (pp. 41–196): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
He, P., Veronesi, M., & Engel, S. (2018). Consistency of risk preference measures: an artefactual field experiment from rural China. The Journal of Development Studies, 54(11), 1955–1973.
Hey, J.D., & Orme, C. (1994). Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica, 62(6), 1291–1326.
Holm, H.J., Opper, S., & Nee, V. (2013). Entrepreneurs under uncertainty: an economic experiment in China. Management Science, 59(7), 1479–1724.
Holt, C.A., & Laury, S.K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.
Jacobson, S., & Petrie, R. (2009). Learning from mistakes: What do inconsistent choices over risk tell us? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 38, 143–158.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.
Koudstaal, M., Sloof, R., & Van Praag, M. (2015). Risk, uncertainty, and entrepreneurship: Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment. Management Science, 62(10), 2765–3084.
Lejuez, C.W., Read, J.P., Kahler, C.W., Richards, J.B., Ramsey, S.E., Stuart, G.L., Strong, D.R., & Brown, R.A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the balloon analogue risk task (bart). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(2), 75–84.
Levitt, S.D., & List, J.A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174.
Lönnqvist, J.-E., Verkasalo, M., Walkowitzc, G., & Wichardt, P.C. (2015). Measuring individual risk attitudes in the lab: Task or ask? an empirical comparison. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 119, 254–266.
Loomes, G. (1988). Different experimental procedures for obtaining valuations of risky actions: Implications for utility theory. Theory and Decision, 25 (1), 1–23.
Loomes, G., & Pogrebna, G. (2014). Measuring individual risk attitudes when preferences are imprecise. The Economic Journal, 124(576), 569–593.
Lusk, J.L., & Coble, K.H. (2005). Risk perceptions, risk preference, and acceptance of risky food. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2), 393–405.
Maart-Noelck, S.C., & Musshoff, O. (2013). Measuring the risk attitude of decision-makers: are there differences between groups of methods and persons? The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 58, 336–352.
Noussair, C.N., Trautmann, S.T., & Van de Kuilen, G. (2013). Higher order risk attitudes, demographics, and financial decisions. Review of Economic Studies, 81(1), 325–355.
Offerman, T., & Schotter, A. (2009). Imitation and luck: an experimental study on social sampling. Games and Economic Behavior, 65(2), 461–502.
Pedroni, A., Frey, R., Bruhin, A., Dutilh, G., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2017). The risk elicitation puzzle. Nature Human Behaviour, 1 (11), 803.
Prelec, D. (1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica, 66(3), 497–527.
Reynaud, A., & Couture, S. (2012). Stability of risk preference measures: Results from a field experiment on French farmers. Theory and Decision, 73(2), 203–221.
Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(36), 15268–15273.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285.
Sutter, M., Kocher, M.G., Glätzle-Rützler, D., & Trautmann, S.T. (2013). Impatience and uncertainty: Experimental decisions predict adolescents’ field behavior. American Economic Review, 103(1), 510–31.
Sydnor, J. (2010). (Over) insuring modest risks. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(4), 177–99.
Tanaka, T., Camerer, C.F., & Nguyen, Q. (2010). Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. American Economic Review, 100(1), 557–571.
Thunström, L., & Ritten, C.J. (2019). Endogenous attention to costs. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 59(1), 1–22.
Thunström, L., Nordström, J., Shogren, J.F., Ehmke, M., & van’t Veld, K. (2016). Strategic self-ignorance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 52(2), 117–136.
Tynan, M. (2018). The domain-specific risk-taking scale lacks convergence with alternative risk-taking propensity measures. Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Iowa State University, 16477.
Verschoor, A., D’Exelle, B., & Perez-Viana, B. (2016). Lab and life: Does risky choice behaviour observed in experiments reflect that in the real world? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 128, 134–148.
Vieider, F.M., Lefebvre, M., Bouchouicha, R., Chmura, T., Hakimov, R., Krawczyk, M., & Martinsson, P. (2015). Common components of risk and uncertainty attitudes across contexts and domains: Evidence from 30 countries. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(3), 421–452.
Viscusi, W.K., Phillips, O., & Kroll, S. (2011). Risky investment decisions: How are individuals influenced by their groups? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 43(2), 81–106.
Wakker, P.P. (2008). Explaining the characteristics of the power (crra) utility family. Health Economics, 17(12), 1329–1344.
Wakker, P.P. (2010). Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity. Cambridge University Press.
Weber, E.U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N.E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–290.
Weber, E.U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205–1217.
