What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior

Abt, H.A. (1993), “Institutional productivities”, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 105, pp. 794‐8. Ahmed, T., Johnson, B., Oppenheim, C. and Peck, C. (2004), “Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited: Part II. The 1953 Watson and Crick article on the structure of DNA”, Scientometrics, Vol. 61, pp. 147‐56. Aksnes, D.W. and Taxt, R.E. (2004), “Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university”, Research Evaluation, Vol. 13, pp. 33‐41. American Psychological Association (2004), Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, American Psychological Association (APA), Washington, DC. Anderson, A. (1988), “First scientific fraud conviction”, Nature, Vol. 335, p. 389. Anderson, R.C., Narin, F. and McAllister, P. (1978), “Publication ratings versus peer ratings of universities”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 29, pp. 91‐103. Archambault, E., Gagné, E.‐V., Côté, G., Larivière, V. and Gingras, Y. (2005), “Welcome to the linguistic warp zone: benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities”, in Ingwersen, P. and Larsen, B. (Eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Karolinska University Press, Stockholm. Ayres, I. and Vars, F.E. (2000), “Determinants of citations to articles in élite law reviews”, Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 29, pp. 427‐50. Baldi, S. (1998), “Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: a network‐analytic model”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 63, pp. 829‐46. Bayer, A.E. and Folger, J. (1966), “Some correlates of a citation measure of productivity in science”, Sociology of Education, Vol. 39, pp. 381‐90. Bazerman, C. (1988), Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. Beaver, D.B. (2004), “Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?”, Scientometrics, Vol. 60, pp. 399‐408. Bonzi, S. and Snyder, H.W. (1991), “Motivations for citation – a comparison of self citation and citation to others”, Scientometrics, Vol. 21, pp. 245‐54. Borgman, C.L. and Furner, J. (2002), “Scholarly communication and bibliometrics”, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 36, pp. 3‐72. Bornmann, L. and Daniel, H.‐D. (2005), “Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Analysis of reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions”, Scientometrics, Vol. 63, pp. 297‐320. Bott, D.M. and Hargens, L.L. (1991), “Are sociologists' publications uncited? Citation rates of journal articles, chapters, and books”, The American Sociologist, Vol. 22, pp. 147‐58. Boyack, K.W. and Klavans, R. (2005), “Predicting the importance of current papers”, in Ingwersen, P. and Larsen, B. (Eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Karolinska University Press, Stockholm. Braun, T., Glänzel, W. and Grupp, H. (1995a), “The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989‐1993. 1. All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics”, Scientometrics, Vol. 33, pp. 263‐93. Braun, T., Glänzel, W. and Grupp, H. (1995b), “The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989‐1993. 2. Life sciences”, Scientometrics, Vol. 34, pp. 207‐37. Broadus, R.N. (1971), “Literature of social sciences – survey of citation studies”, International Social Science Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 236‐43. Broadus, R.N. (1983), “An investigation of the validity of bibliographic citations”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 34, pp. 132‐5. Brooks, T.A. (1985), “Private acts and public objects – an investigation of citer motivations”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 36, pp. 223‐9. Brooks, T.A. (1986), “Evidence of complex citer motivations”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 37, pp. 34‐6. Burrell, Q.L. (2003), “Predicting future citation behavior”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 54, pp. 372‐8. Cano, V. (1989), “Citation behavior: classification, utility, and location”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 40, pp. 284‐90. Cano, V. and Lind, N.C. (1991), “Citation life‐cycles of 10 citation‐classics”, Scientometrics, Vol. 22, pp. 297‐312. Carpenter, M.P. and Narin, F. (1981), “The adequacy of the Science Citation Index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 32, pp. 430‐9. Case, D.O. and Higgins, G.M. (2000), “How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 51, pp. 635‐45. Cawkell, A.E. (1968), “Citation practices”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 24, pp. 299‐305. Cawkell, A.E. (1976), “Documentation note – citations, obsolescence, enduring articles, and multiple authorships”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 32, pp. 53‐8. Christensen‐Szalanski, J.J.J. and Beach, L.R. (1984), “The citation bias – fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature”, American Psychologist, Vol. 39, pp. 75‐8. Chubin, D.E. and Moitra, S.D. (1975), “Content analysis of references: adjunct or alternative to citation counting?”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 5, pp. 423‐41. Cole, J.R. (2000), “A short history of the use of citations as a measure of the impact of scientific and scholarly work”, in Cronin, B. and Atkins, H.B. (Eds), The Web of Knowledge. A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield, Information Today, Medford, NJ. Cole, J. and Cole, S. (1971), “Measuring quality of sociological research – problems in use of science citation index”, American Sociologist, Vol. 6, pp. 23‐9. Cole, J.R. and Cole, S. (1972), “The Ortega hypothesis”, Science, Vol. 178, pp. 368‐75. Cole, J.R. and Cole, S. (1973), Social Stratification in Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Cole, S. (1970), “Professional standing and reception of scientific discoveries”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 76, pp. 286‐306. Cole, S. (1975), “The growth of scientific knowledge: theories of deviance as a case study”, in Coser, L.A. (Ed.), The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, NY. Cole, S. (1989), “Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists”, Trends in Biochemical Sciences, Vol. 14, pp. 9‐13. Cole, S. (1992), Making Science. Between Nature and Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Cole, S. and Cole, J.R. (1967), “Scientific output and recognition – study in operation of reward system in science”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 32, pp. 377‐90. Cole, S. and Cole, J.R. (1968), “Visibility and structural bases of awareness of scientific research”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 33, pp. 397‐413. Cole, S. and Singer, B. (1991), “A theory of limited differences”, in Zuckerman, H., Cole, J.R. and Bruer, J.T. (Eds), The Outer Circle. Women in the Scientific Community, W.W. Norton & Company, London. Collins, H.M. (1999), “Tantalus and the aliens: publications, audiences and the search for gravitational waves”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 29, pp. 163‐97. Collins, H.M. (2000), “Surviving closure: post‐rejection adaptation and plurality in science”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 65, pp. 824‐45. Collins, H. (2004), Gravity's Shadow. The Search for Gravitational Waves, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Cozzens, S.E. (1985), “Comparing the sciences – citation context analysis of papers from neuropharmacology and the sociology of science”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 15, pp. 127‐53. Cozzens, S.E. (1989), “What do citations count? The rhetoric‐first model”, Scientometrics, Vol. 15, pp. 437‐47. Crane, D. (1972), Invisible Colleges, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Cronin, B. (1981a), “Transatlantic citation patterns in educational psychology”, Social Science Information Studies, Vol. 24, pp. 48‐51. Cronin, B. (1981b), “Agreement and divergence on referencing practice”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 3, pp. 27‐33. Cronin, B. (1982), “Norms and functions in citation – the view of journal editors and referees in psychology”, Social Science Information Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 65‐78. Cronin, B. (1984), The Citation Process. The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication, Taylor Graham, Oxford. Cronin, B. (2004), “Normative shaping of scientific practice: the magic of Merton”, Scientometrics, Vol. 60, pp. 41‐6. Cronin, B. (2005a), The Hand of Science. Academic Writing and its Rewards, Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD. Cronin, B. (2005b), “A hundred million acts of whimsy?”, Current Science, Vol. 89, pp. 1505‐9. Daniel, H.‐D. (1993, 2004), Guardians of Science. Fairness and Reliability of Peer Review, Wiley‐VCH, Weinheim. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (1998), Recommendations of the Commission on Professional Self Regulation in Science. Proposals for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), German Research Foundation, Bonn. Eichorn, P. and Yankauer, A. (1987), “Do authors check their references? A survey of accuracy of references in 3 public‐health journals”, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 77, pp. 1011‐12. Evans, J.T., Nadjari, H.I. and Burchell, S.A. (1990), “Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals – a continuing peer‐review problem”, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 263, pp. 1353‐4. Finney, B. (1979), “The reference characteristics of scientific texts”, MSc dissertation, Centre for Information Science, City University, London. Frost, C.O. (1979), “Use of citations in literary research – preliminary classification of citation functions”, Library Quarterly, Vol. 49, pp. 399‐414. Frost, C.O. (1989), “The literature of online public access catalogs, 1980‐85 – an analysis of citation patterns”, Library Resources & Technical Services, Vol. 33, pp. 344‐57. Garfield, E. (1962), “Can citation indexing be automated?”, Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 1, pp. 84‐90. Garfield, E. (1970), “Citation indexing for studying science”, Nature, Vol. 227, pp. 669‐71. Garfield, E. (1972), “Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation – journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies”, Science, Vol. 178, pp. 471‐9. Garfield, E. (1978), “High impact science and case of Arthur Jensen”, Current Contents, No. 41, pp. 5‐15. Garfield, E. (1981), “Citation classics – four years of the human side of science”, Current Contents, No. 22, pp. 5‐16. Garfield, E. (1998), “Random thoughts on citationology. Its theory and practice – comments on theories of citation?”, Scientometrics, Vol. 43, pp. 69‐76. Garfield, E. (2002), “Highly cited authors”, Scientist, Vol. 16, p. 10. Garfield, E. and Welljamsdorof, A. (1990), “The impact of fraudulent research on the scientific literature – the Stephen E. Breuning case”, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 263, pp. 1424‐6. Garzone, M. and Mercer, R.E. (2000), “Towards an automated citation classifier”, Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings, Vol. 1822, pp. 337‐46. Gilbert, G.N. (1977), “Referencing as persuasion”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 7, pp. 113‐22. Gläser, J. and Laudel, G. (2001), “Integrating scientometric indicators into sociological studies: methodical and methodological problems”, Scientometrics, Vol. 52, pp. 411‐34. Gross, P.L.K. and Gross, E.M. (1927), “College libraries and chemical education”, Science, Vol. 66, pp. 385‐9. Hagstrom, W.O. (1971), “Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments”, Sociology of Education, Vol. 44, pp. 375‐97. Hanney, S., Grant, J., Jones, T. and Buxton, M. (2005b), “Categorising citations to trace research impact”, in Ingwersen, P. and Larsen, B. (Eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Karolinska University Press, Stockholm. Hanney, S., Frame, I., Grant, J., Green, P. and Buxton, M. (2003), From Bench to Bedside: Tracing the Payback Forwards from Basic or Early Clinical Research – A Preliminary Exercise and Proposals for a Future Study, HERG Research Report No. 31, Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, Uxbridge. Hanney, S., Frame, I., Grant, J., Buxton, M., Young, T. and Lewison, G. (2005a), “Using categorisations of citations when assessing the outcomes from health research”, Scientometrics, Vol. 65, pp. 357‐79. Hargens, L.L. (2000), “Using the literature: reference networks, reference contexts, and the social structure of scholarship”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 65, pp. 846‐65. Hemlin, S. (1996), “Research on research evaluations”, Social Epistemology, Vol. 10, pp. 209‐50. Herlach, G. (1978), “Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of link between cited and citing article”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 29, pp. 308‐10. Hicks, D. and Potter, J. (1991), “Sociology of scientific knowledge – a reflexive citation analysis or science disciplines and disciplining science?”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 21, pp. 459‐501. Hjorland, B. (2000), “Relevance research: the missing perspective(s): ‘non‐relevance’ and ‘epistemological relevance’”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 51, pp. 209‐11. Holden, C. (1987), “NIMH finds a case of serious misconduct”, Science, Vol. 235, pp. 1566‐7. Hooten, P.A. (1991), “Frequency and functional use of cited documents in information science”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 42, pp. 397‐404. Hurt, C.D. (1987), “Conceptual citation differences in science, technology, and social sciences literature”, Information Processing & Management, Vol. 23, pp. 1‐6. Inhaber, H. and Przednowek, K. (1976), “Quality of research and Nobel Prizes”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 6, pp. 33‐50. Jensen, A.R. (1969), “How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?”, Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 39, pp. 1‐123. Johansson, C.M.A. (1976), “Citation behaviour in chemistry”, MSc dissertation, Centre for Information Science, City University, London. Kellsey, C. and Knievel, J.E. (2004), “Global English in the humanities? A longitudinal citation study of foreign‐language use by humanities scholars”, College & Research Libraries, Vol. 65, pp. 194‐204. King, J. (1987), “A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 13, pp. 261‐76. Klamer, A. and Van Dalen, H.P. (2002), “Attention and the art of scientific publishing”, Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 9, pp. 289‐315. Knorr‐Cetina, K. (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science, Pergamon Press, Oxford. Knorr‐Cetina, K. (1991), “Merton sociology of science: the first and the last sociology of science”, Contemporary Sociology – A Journal of Reviews, Vol. 20, pp. 522‐6. Kochan, C.A. and Budd, J.M. (1992), “The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 43, pp. 488‐93. Kochen, M. (1978), “Models of scientific output”, in Elkana, Y., Lederberg, J., Merton, R.K., Thackray, A. and Zuckerman, H. (Eds), Toward a Metric of Science. The Advent of Science Indicators, John Wiley, New York, NY. Krampen, G. and Montada, L. (2002), Wissenschaftsforschung in der Psychologie, Hogrefe, Göttingen. Kurtz, M.J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Murray, S.S., Martimbeau, N. and Elwell, B. (2005), “The bibliometric properties of article readership information”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 56, pp. 111‐28. Laband, D.N. (1990), “Is there value‐added from the review process in economics? Preliminary evidence from authors”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 105, pp. 341‐52. Laband, D.N. and Piette, M.J. (1994), “Favoritism versus search for good paper: empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 102, pp. 194‐203. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage, London. Lawani, S.M. (1977), “The professional literature used by American and French agronomists and the implications for agronomic education”, Journal of Agronomic Education, Vol. 6, pp. 41‐6. Lawani, S.M. (1986), “Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research”, Scientometrics, Vol. 9, pp. 13‐25. Lawani, S.M. and Bayer, A.E. (1983), “Validity of citation criteria for assessing the influence of scientific publications: new evidence with peer assessment”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 34, pp. 59‐66. Lawrence, S. (2001), “Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact”, Nature, Vol. 411, p. 521. Lewison, G. (1998), “Gastroenterology research in the United Kingdom: funding sources and impact”, Gut, Vol. 43, pp. 288‐93. Lewison, G. and Dawson, G. (1998), “The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research”, Scientometrics, Vol. 41, pp. 17‐27. Lipetz, B.A. (1965), “Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through inclusion of citation relationship indicators”, American Documentation, Vol. 16, pp. 81‐90. Liu, M. (1993a), “Progress in documentation – the complexities of citation practice: a review of citation studies”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 49, pp. 370‐408. Liu, M.X. (1993b), “A study of citing motivation of Chinese scientists”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 19, pp. 13‐23. Liu, Z.M. (1997), “Citation theories in the framework of international flow of information: new evidence with translation analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 48, pp. 80‐7. McCain, K.W. and Salvucci, L.J. (2005), “How influential is Brooks' Law? A citation context analysis of Frederick Brooks' The Mythical Man‐Month”, in Ingwersen, P. and Larsen, B. (Eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Karolinska University Press, Stockholm. McCain, K.W. and Turner, K. (1989), “Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics”, Scientometrics, Vol. 17, pp. 127‐63. MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. (1986), “Quantitative measures of communication in science – a study of the formal level”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 16, pp. 151‐72. MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. (1987), “Another test of the normative theory of citing”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 38, pp. 305‐6. MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. (1988), “Author motivation for not citing influences – a methodological note”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 39, pp. 432‐3. MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. (1989a), “Problems of citation analysis – a critical review”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 40, pp. 342‐9. MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. (1989b), “Citation analysis and the science policy arena”, Trends in Biochemical Sciences, Vol. 14, pp. 8‐12. MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. (1996), “Problems of citation analysis”, Scientometrics, Vol. 36, pp. 435‐44. MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. (1997), “Citation content analysis of a botany journal”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 48, pp. 274‐5. Mählck, P. and Persson, O. (2000), “Socio‐bibliometric mapping of intra‐departmental networks”, Scientometrics, Vol. 49, pp. 81‐91. Maricic, S., Spaventi, J., Pavicic, L. and Pifat‐Mrzljak, G. (1998), “Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 49, pp. 530‐40. Meadows, A.J. (1998), Communicating Research, Academic Press, London. Menou, M.J. (1983), “Cultural barriers to the international transfer of information”, Information Processing & Management, Vol. 19, pp. 121‐9. Mercer, R.E. and Di Marco, C (2004), “A design methodology for a biomedical literature indexing tool using the rhetoric of science”, BioLink 2004: Linking Biological Literature, Ontologies and Databases: Tools for Users, Boston, MA. Merton, R.K. (1957), “Priorities in scientific discovery – a chapter in the sociology of science”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 22, pp. 635‐59. Merton, R.K. (1968), “The Matthew effect in science”, Science, Vol. 159, pp. 56‐63. Merton, R.K. (Ed.) (1973), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Merton, R.K. (1988), “The Matthew effect in science II: cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property”, Isis, Vol. 79, pp. 606‐23. Moed, H.F. and Garfield, E. (2004), “In basic science the percentage of ‘authoritative’ references decreases as bibliographies become shorter”, Scientometrics, Vol. 60, pp. 295‐303. Moed, H.F., Burger, W.J.M., Frankfort, J.G. and Van Raan, A.F.J. (1985), “The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance”, Research Policy, Vol. 14, pp. 131‐49. Moravcsik, M.J. (1988), “Citation context classification of a citation classic concerning citation context classification”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 18, pp. 515‐21. Moravcsik, M.J. and Murugesan, P. (1975), “Some results on the function and quality of citations”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 5, pp. 86‐92. Murugesan, P. and Moravcsik, M.J. (1978), “Variation of nature of citation measures with journals and scientific specialties”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 29, pp. 141‐7. Myers, C.R. (1970), “Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology”, American Psychologist, Vol. 25, pp. 1041‐8. Narin, F. (1976), Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity, Computer Horizons, Cherry Hill, NJ. Nature (2005), “Not‐so‐deep impact”, Nature, Vol. 435, pp. 1003‐4. Nicolaisen, J. (2002), “The J‐shaped distribution of citedness”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 58, pp. 383‐95. Nicolaisen, J. (2003), “The social act of citing: towards new horizons in citation theory”, ASIST 2003: Proceedings of the 66th ASIST Annual Meeting, Vol. 40, pp. 12‐20. O'Connor, J. (1980), “Citing statements – recognition by computer and use to improve retrieval”, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 17, pp. 177‐9. Oppenheim, C. (1995), “The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British library and information science university departments”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 51, pp. 18‐27. Oppenheim, C. (1997), “The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 53, pp. 477‐87. Oppenheim, C. and Renn, S.P. (1978), “Highly cited old papers and reasons why they continue to be cited”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 29, pp. 225‐31. Peritz, B.C. (1983), “A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields”, Scientometrics, Vol. 5, pp. 303‐12. Peters, H.P.F. and Van Raan, A.F.J. (1994), “On determinants of citation scores – a case study in chemical engineering”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 45, pp. 39‐49. Price, D.J.D. (1976), “A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 27, pp. 292‐306. Rabow, H. (2005), “The discovery of discoveries: exploring the dissemination of major findings in the life sciences”, in Ingwersen, P. and Larsen, B. (Eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Karolinska University Press, Stockholm. Rinia, E.J., Van Leeuwen, T.N., Van Vuren, H.G. and Van Raan, A.F.J. (1998), “Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria – evaluation of condensed matter physics in The Netherlands”, Research Policy, Vol. 27, pp. 95‐107. Sandström, U., Wadskog, D. and Karlsson, S. (2005), “Research institutes and universities: does collaboration pay?”, in Ingwersen, P. and Larsen, B. (Eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Karolinska University Press, Stockholm. Seglen, P.O. (1989), “From bad to worse – evaluation by journal impact”, Trends in Biochemical Sciences, Vol. 14, pp. 326‐7. Shadish, W.R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M. and Sengupta, S.K. (1995), “Author judgments about works they cite – three studies from psychology journals”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 25, pp. 477‐98. Shaw, J.G. (1987), “Article‐by‐article citation analysis of medical journals”, Scientometrics, Vol. 12, pp. 101‐10. Silverman, R.J. (1985), “Higher education as a maturing field? Evidence from referencing practices”, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 23, pp. 150‐83. Simonton, D.K. (1992), “Leaders of American psychology, 1879‐1967: career development, creative output, and professional achievement”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 62, pp. 5‐17. Small, H.G. (1978), “Cited documents as concept symbols”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 8, pp. 327‐40. Small, H.G. (1982), “Citation context analysis”, in Dervin, B.J. and Voigt, M.J. (Eds), Progress in Communication Sciences, Ablex, Norwood, NJ. Small, H. (1998), “Citations and consilience in science”, Scientometrics, Vol. 43, pp. 143‐8. Small, H. (2004), “On the shoulders of Robert Merton: towards a normative theory of citation”, Scientometrics, Vol. 60, pp. 71‐9. Smart, S. and Waldfogel, J. (1996), “A citation‐based test for discrimination at economics and finance journals”, NBER Working Paper No. 5460, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Smith, A. and Eysenck, M. (2002), The Correlation between RAE Ratings and Citation Counts in Psychology, Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London. Smith, L.C. (1981), “Citation analysis”, Library Trends, Vol. 30, pp. 83‐106. Snyder, H. and Bonzi, S. (1998), “Patterns of self‐citation across disciplines (1980‐1989)”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 24, pp. 431‐5. Soper, M.E. (1976), “Characteristics and use of personal collections”, Library Quarterly, Vol. 46, pp. 397‐415. Spiegel‐Rösing, I. (1977), “Science studies – bibliometric and content‐analysis”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 7, pp. 97‐113. Stack, S. (2004), “Gender, children and research productivity”, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 45, pp. 891‐920. Stewart, J.A. (1983), “Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles”, Social Forces, Vol. 62, pp. 166‐89. Stewart, J.A. (1990), Drifting Continents and Colliding Paradigms: Perspectives on the Geoscience Revolution, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. Swinbanks, D., Nathan, R. and Triendl, R. (1997), “Western research assessment meets Asian cultures”, Nature, Vol. 389, pp. 113‐17. Tainer, J.A. (1991), “Science, citation, and funding”, Science, Vol. 251, p. 1408. Tijssen, R.J.W., Van Leeuwen, T.N. and Van Raan, A.F.J. (2002), Mapping the Scientific Performance of German Medical Research. An International Comparative Bibliometric Study, Schattauer, Stuttgart. Ulrich's Periodicals Directory (2005), “The global source for periodicals”, R.R. Bowker, New Providence, NJ. Van Dalen, H.P. and Henkens, K.E. (2004), “Demographers and their journals: who remains uncited after ten years?”, Population and Development Review, Vol. 30, pp. 489‐506. Van Dalen, H.P. and Henkens, K.E. (2005), “Signals in science – on the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science”, Scientometrics, Vol. 64, pp. 209‐33. Van Raan, A.F.J. (2004a), “Measuring science. Capita selecta of current main issues”, in Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W. and Schmoch, U. (Eds), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Van Raan, A.F.J. (2004b), “Sleeping beauties in science”, Scientometrics, Vol. 59, pp. 467‐72. Van Raan, A.F.J. (2005a), “For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis”, Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, Vol. 3, pp. 50‐62. Van Raan, A.F.J. (2005b), “Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods”, Scientometrics, Vol. 62, pp. 133‐43. Van Raan, A.F.J., Visser, M.S., Van Leeuwen, T.N. and Van Wijk, E. (2003), “Bibliometric analysis of psychotherapy research: performance assessment and position in the journal landscape”, Psychotherapy Research, Vol. 13, pp. 511‐28. Vinkler, P. (1987), “A quasi‐quantitative citation model”, Scientometrics, Vol. 12, pp. 47‐72. Voos, H. and Dagaev, K.S. (1976), “Are all citations equal? Or, did we op. cit. your idem?”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 1, pp. 19‐21. Watson, J.D. and Crick, F.H.C. (1953), “Molecular structure of nucleic acids – a structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid”, Nature, Vol. 171, pp. 737‐8. Weingart, P. (2005), “Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: inadvertent consequences?”, Scientometrics, Vol. 62, pp. 117‐31. White, H.D. (2001), “Authors as citers over time”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 52, pp. 87‐108. White, H.D. (2004), “Reward, persuasion, and the Sokal Hoax: a study in citation identities”, Scientometrics, Vol. 60, pp. 93‐120. White, M.D. and Wang, P.L. (1997), “A qualitative study of citing behavior: contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns”, Library Quarterly, Vol. 67, pp. 122‐54. Woolgar, S. (1991), “Beyond the citation debate: towards a sociology of measurement technologies and their use in science policy”, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 18, pp. 319‐26. Yue, W. and Wilson, C.S. (2004), “Measuring the citation impact of research journals in clinical neurology: a structural equation modelling analysis”, Scientometrics, Vol. 60, pp. 317‐32. Ziman, J. (2000), Real Science. What it Is, and What it Means, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Raff, M.C., Stevens, C.F., Roberts, K., Shatz, C.J. and Newsome, W.T. (2004), “Changing scientific publishing”, Science, Vol. 305, pp. 945‐6. Walter, G., Bloch, S., Hunt, G. and Fisher, K. (2003), “Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality?”, Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 178, pp. 280‐1.