Feminist urban living labs and social sustainability: lessons from Sweden

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 4 - Trang 1-22 - 2022
Caroline Wrangsten1,2,3, Sara Ferlander4, Sara Borgström5
1SWECO, Stockholm, Sweden
2IQS - The Swedish Center for Innovation and Quality in the Built Environment (IQ Samhällsbyggnad), Stockholm, Sweden
3JPI Urban Europe, Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG), Wien, Austria
4The School of Social Sciences, Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden
5The Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Technology, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

Tóm tắt

A debate about emerging models of urban living labs (ULLs) 2.0 is taking place in the literature, highlighting the importance of social aspects. The aim of this paper is to examine feminist ULLs as a potential source of social sustainability. This is conducted through a case study of a feminist ULL in Sweden, where girls and young women, together with multiple professional stakeholders, used Minecraft to redesign a public square in their neighbourhood - a marginalised suburban area of Stockholm. Data was collected through participant observations of six experimental labs during 1 year, surveys of the ULL participants, and an analysis of the final Minecraft designs. The empirical findings reveal a process of mutual learning between girls and professional stakeholders, where the girls were viewed as place experts. The findings also reveal that the girls’ visions include a socially sustainable transition of the urban square: from patriarchal to inclusive, from grey to green, and from a transit area to a meeting-place. There were some differences between girls and professional stakeholders. Whereas the professionals tended to emphasise security in their visions, the girls emphasised liveability. Although more research is needed, this paper concludes that feminist ULLs can be a possible source of social sustainability. However, the ULL process must both be inclusive, and at the same time unlock long-term transformation in the physical environment.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aernouts N, Maranghi E, Ryckewaert M. Towards a definition of socially oriented urban living labs. Brussels: Soholab; 2020. Andersdotter Fabre E, Anneroth E, Wrangsten C. Urban girls Catalouge. Stockholm: Global Utmaning; 2019. Andersson B, Reutlinger C, Roth P, Zimmermann D. Young people’s appropriation of public space. Participation through voice, sociability, and activity. In: Walther A, Batsleer J, Loncle P, Pohl Z, editors. Young People and the Struggle for Participation. Contested practices, power and pedagogies and public spaces: Routledge; 2019. Andersson C. Public space and the new urban agenda. J Public Space. 2016;(1):5. Anneroth E, Jukkala T, Ferlander S. Feministisk stadsplanering som social innovation. In: Bonnedahl KJ, Egan Sjölander A & M Lindberg (eds.). Social innovation för hållbar utveckling (p. 149-163). Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2022. Baeten G, Westin S, Pull E, Molina E. Pressure and violence: housing renovation and displacement in Sweden. Environ Plann A Econ Space. 2017;49:631–51. Beebeejaun Y. Gender, urban space and the right to the city. J Urban Aff. 2017;39:323–34. Blomdahl U, Elofsson S, Åkesson M. Spontanidrott för vilka? En studie av kön och nyttjande av planlagda utomhusytor för spontanidrott under sommarhalvåret. Stockholms stad: Idrottsförvaltningen; 2012. Botkyrka kommun. (2016). Detaljplan för Fittja centrum, Botkyrka kommun. Plan- och genomförandebeskrivning. Botkyrka kommun. (2019). Kommunfakta. Botkyrka kommun. (2021). Nu får Fittjaborna ett vardagrsum på torget. Bremberg E, Slättman H. Hållbarhetsrapport 2021 [sustainability report 2021]. Stockholms stad: Stadsledningskontoret; 2021. Bryman A. Social research methods. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Bulkeley H, Coenen L, Frantzeskaki N, Hartmann C, Kronsell A, Mai L. Urban Living Labs: Governing Urban Sustainability Transitions. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2017;22:13–7. Chronéer D, Ståhlbröst A, Habibpour A. Urban living labs: towards an integrated understanding of their key components. Technol Innov Manag Rev. 2019;9:50–62. Dahlberg A, Borgström S. Urbana gröna allmänningar för alla - eller inte? Tillgänglighet och mångfunktionalitet i en föränderlig stad. In: Borén T, editor. . Stockholm: Urban utveckling och interaktion. Ymer 137. Svenska sällskapet för antropologi och geografi; 2017. p. 165–87. Dahlstedt M, Ekholm D. Social exclusion and multi-ethnic suburbs in Sweden. In: Hanlon B, Vicino TJ, editors. The Routledge companion to the suburbs. New York: Routledge; 2019. p. 163–72. Della Valle N, Gantioler S, Tomasi S. Can behaviourally informed urban living labs foster the energy transition in cities? Front Sustainable Cities. 2021;3:573174. Delmos. Segregation i Sverige. Årsrapport 2021 om den socioekonomiska boendesegregationens utveckling. Huddinge: Delegationen mot segregation; 2021. Drisko J, Maschi T. Content analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. Ericsson U, Molina I, Ristilammi PM. Miljonprogram och media. Föreställningar om människor och förorter. Norrköping: Integrationsverket; 2002. Fainstein S, DeFilippis J. Readings in planning theory. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2018. Frantzeskaki N, Broto V, Coenen L, Loorbach D, editors. Urban sustainability transitions. New York: Routledge; 2017. Fullagar S, O’Brien W, Lloyd K. Feminist perspectives on third places. In: Dolley J, Bosman C, editors. Rehtinking third places: informal public spaces and community building. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2019. p. 20–37. Gans H. The Urban Villagers. New York: The Free Press; 1962. Garcia-Ramon MD, Ortiz A, Prats M. Urban planning, gender and the use of public space in a peripherial neighbourhood of Barcelona. Cities. 2004;21:215-223. Gehl J, Svarre B. How to study public life. Washington: Island Press; 2013. Gemzöe L. Feminism. Stockholm: Bilda Förlag; 2008. Haraway D. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem Stud. 1988;14(3):575–99. Her City. (2021). https://hercity.unhabitat.org (website). Jacobs A. In: Larice M, Macdonald E, editors. (2013) The urban design reader. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2007. Jacobs A, Appleyard D. Toward an Urban Design manifesto. J Am Plan Assoc. 1987;53:1. Jacobs J. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House; 1961. Javadi H. Sustainable urban public squares. In: European Journal of Sustainable Development; 2016. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n3p36. JPI Urban Europe. Joint call for proposals for research and innovation projects on urban accessibility and connectivity. Annex B: Urban Living Labs; 2020. p. 59–60. Jukkala T, Ferlander S, Bogren A, Ejigu A. Det sociala kapitalets rumslighet: en studie om kvinnors upplevelser av mötesplatser i Flemingsberg. In: Gawell M, Papakostas A, editors. Att göra stad i Stockholms urbana periferi. Stockholm: Stockholmia förlag; 2020. p. 231–60. Källström Å, Andersson Bruck K. Etiska reflektioner i forskning med barn. Stockholm: Gleerups; 2017. Kaw JK, Lee H, Sameh W. The hidden wealth of cities: creating, financing, and managing public spaces, vol. 2020. Washington DC: World bank; 2020. Kern L. The Feminist City. Claiming space in a man-made world: Verso Books; 2020. Larsson A, Jalakis A. Jämställdhet nästa! Samhällsplanering ur ett genusperspektiv. Stockholm: SNS Förlag; 2008. Lieberg M. Ungas rum och rörelser i stadens periferi. Nord Arkitekturforskning (Nordic Journal of Architectural Research). 1998;11:21–35. Listerborn C. Trygg stad: Diskurser om kvinnors rädsla i forskning, policyutveckling och lokal praktik. Göteborg: Chalmers tekniska högskola; 2002. Listerborn C. Who speaks? And who listens? The relationship between planners and women’s participation in local planning in a multi-cultural urban environment. GeoJournal. 2008;70:61–74. Listerborn C. Gender and urban Neoliberalization. In: Datta A, Hopkings P, Johnston L, Olson E, Silva JM, editors. Routledge handbook of gender and feminist geographies. New York: Routledge; 2020. Littig B, Griessler E. Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. Int J Sustain Dev. 2005;8:1–24. Madanipour A. Marginal public spaces in European cities. J Urban Des. 2004;9:267–86. Madanipour A. Rethinking public space: between rhetoric and reality. Urban Des Int. 2019;24:38–46. Mahmoud IH, Morello E, Ludlow D, Salvia G. Co-creation pathways to inform shared governance of urban living labs in practice: lessons from three European projects. Front Sustainable Cities. 2021;3:1–17. Marvin S, Bulkeley H, Mai L, McCormick K, Palgan YV. Urban living labs: experimenting with City futures. London: Routledge; 2018. Memluk MC. Designing Urban Squares. In: Özyavuz M, editor. Advances in landscape architecture. Rijeka: InTech Open; 2013. p. 513–30. Menny M, Palgan YV, McCormick K. Urban living labs and the role of users in co-creation. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc. 2018;27:68–77. Molina I. Planning for patriarchy? Gender equality in the Swedish modern built Enviroment. In: Staub A, editor. The Routledge companion to modernity, space and gender. New York: Routledge; 2018. p. 26–40. Molina I. Uppdrag avkolonarisering. Bang. Feministisk kulturtidskrift. 2013;1:55-60. Nesti G. Co-production for innovation: the urban living lab experience. Polic Soc. 2018;37:310–25. Olsson S, Ohlander M, Cruse Sondén G. Lokala torg. Liv, miljö och verksamheter på förortstorg. Göteborg: Chalmers, Centrum för byggnadskultur; 2004. Palmer H, Polk M, Simon D, Hansson S. Evaluative and enabling infrastructures: supporting the ability of urban coproduction processes to contribute to societal change. Urban Transform. 2020;2:6. Pereira L, Drimie S, Zgambo O, et al. Planning for change: transformation labs for an alternative food system in Cape Town, South Africa. Urban Transform. 2020;2:13. Skinnari J, Marklund F, Nilsson E, Stjärnqvist C, Vesterhav D. Relationen till rättsväsendet i socialt utsatta områden. Rapport 2018: 6. Stockholm: BRÅ; 2018. Snyder MG. Feminist theory and planning theory: lessons from feminist epistemologies. Berkeley Plann J. 1995;10(1):91–106. Statistics Sweden. Statistisk lägesbild 2021 – genomförandet av Agenda 2021 I Sverige [Statistical Review 2021 - Implementation of the 2030 Agenda in Sweden]. Stockholm: SCB; 2021. Stigendal M. Samhällsgränser. Stockholm: Liber; 2016. Thapar-Björkert S, Molina I, Villacura Rana K. From welfare to warfare: exploring the militarisation of the Swedish suburb. In: Keskinen S, Skaptadóttir UD, Toivanen M, editors. Undoing homogeneity in the Nordic region: migration, difference and the politics of solidarity. London: Routledge; 2019. p. 141–61. Timms D, Ferlander S. Social capital and third places through the internet: lessons from a disadvantaged Swedish community. In: Steyn J, Johanson G, editors. ICTs and sustainable solutions for the digital divide: theory and perspectives: IGI Global; 2011. p. 199–217. UN General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. UN Habitat. (2015). The global public space toolkit: from global principles to local policies and practice revision. UN-Habitat. ISBN: 978-92-1-132656-7. Velasquez J. Feminiserad segregation och förortsfeminism i Fittja: Om behovet av ny forskning och nya perspektiv på “integration” och segregation’. In: Samtidshistoriska frågor Bortom rösträtten; 2011. p. 175–91. Von Heland, F., Westerberg P. and Nyberg, M. (2016). Using Minecraft as a citizen participation tool in urban design and decision making. Future of Places (conference paper). von Wirth T, Fuenfschilling L, Frantzeskaki N, Coenen L. Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. Eur Plan Stud. 2019;27(2):229–57. Voytenko Y, McCormick K, Evans J, Schliwa G. Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda. J Clean Prod. 2015;123:45–54. Whyte WH Jr. The social life of small urban spaces. Washington, D.C.: Conservation Foundation; 1980. Wojnarowska A. Model for assessment of public space quality in town Centres. Eur Spat Res Policy. 2016;1:23, 86, 90. Wolfram M. Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: a framework for research and policy. Cities. 2016;51:121–30. Wolfram M, Ravetz J, Scholl C. Beyond Urban Living Labs: The making of transformative urban innovation systems: Biomed Central; 2021. https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/urbanll Wrangsten C. Back to the future: public space design by girls - a case study of #UrbanGirlsMovement in Fittja, Sweden: Master thesis: Stockholm University; 2019. Yin RK. Case study research design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2014.