A transaction cost approach to supply chain management
Tóm tắt
Observes that supply chain management is a rapidly‐evolving subject which offers many insights into how industries are organized and into the efficiency gains which can be made under different organizational structures, pointing out that it is an interdisciplinary concept, drawing on aspects of marketing, economics, logistics, organizational behaviour, etc. Presents a framework from the economics literature which may be useful for those interested in understanding and exploring the concept of supply chain management. Describes the origins and development of transaction cost analysis and explains the key concepts of the framework. Discusses the potential effects of transaction costs on vertical co‐ordination within an industry and, hence, on supply chain management. Finally, suggests methods for empiricizing transaction cost analysis, resulting in recommendations for closer co‐operation between researchers and business managers.
Tài liệu tham khảo
1Cheung, S.N.S., “On the new institutional economics”, in Werin, L. and Wijkander, H. (Eds), Contract Economics, Blackwell, Oxford, 1992, pp. 48‐71.
2Coase, R.H., “The nature of the firm”, Economica, Vol. 4,1937, pp. 386‐405.
3Eggertsson, T., Economic Behaviour and Institutions, Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,1990.
4North, D.C., ”Institutions, transaction costs and economic growth”, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 25 No. 3, 1987, pp. 419‐28.
5Arrow, K.J., “The organization of economic activity: issues pertinent to the choice of market versus nonmarket allocation”, in Haveman, R.H. and Marglois, J. (Eds), Public Expenditure and Policy Analysis, Markham Publishing, Chicago, IL, 1970, pp. 59‐71.
6Williamson, O.E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti‐Trust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Organization, Free Press, New York, NY, 1975.
7Williamson, O.E., “Transaction cost economics: the governance of contractual relations”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22, 1979, pp. 233‐62.
8Alchian, A.A., “Some economics of property rights”, Il Politico, Vol. 30 No. 4,1965, pp. 816‐29.
9Demsetz, H., “Toward a theory of property rights”, American Economic Review, Vol. 57 No. 2, 1967, pp. 347‐59.
10Alchian, A.A. and Demsetz, H., “Production, information costs, and economic organization”, American Economic Review, Vol. 62, 1972, pp. 777‐95.
11Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H., ”Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3 No. 4, 1976, pp. 305‐60.
12Casson, M., Enterprise and Competitiveness: A Systems View of International Business, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1990.
13Casson, M., The Economics of Business Culture: Game Theory, Transaction Costs and Economic Performance, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991.
14Teece, D.J., “Transaction cost economics and the multinational enterprise: an assessment”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 7, 1986, pp. 21‐45.
15North, D.C. and Thomas, R.P., The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973.
16Mahoney, J.T., “The choice of organizational form: vertical financial ownership versus other methods of vertical integration”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, 1992, pp. 559‐84.
17Simon, H., Administrative Behavior, 2nd ed., Macmillan, New York, NY, 1961.
18Douma, S. and Schreuder, H., Economic Approaches to Organizations, Prentice Hall International (UK), Hemel Hempstead, 1992.
19Klein, B., Crawford, R.G. and Alchian, A.A., “Vertical integration, appropriable rents and the competitive contracting process”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 21 No. 2, 1978, pp. 297‐326.
20Stigler, G.J., “The economics of information”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 69, June 1961, pp. 213‐15.
21Akerlof, G.A., “The market for ‘lemons’: qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, 1970, pp. 488‐500.
22Arrow, K.J., Information and Economic Behavior, Federation of Swedish Industries, Stockholm, 1973.
23Mighell, R.L. and Jones, L.A., Vertical Coordination in Agriculture, USDA ERS‐19, Washington DC, 1963.
24Sporleder, T.L., “Managerial economics of vertically coordinated agricultural firms”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 74 No. 5, December 1992, pp. 1226‐31.
25Note that transaction costs are only one of a number of potential determinants of vertical co‐ordination. For example, the existence of economies and diseconomies of scale influence whether it is economically efficient for a firm to be vertically integrated. Also, the capital investment requirements and additional risks involved in vertical integration could outweigh any transaction cost advantages of integration. Sometimes, firms vertically integrate to reduce their taxation burdens or to circumvent restrictive import regulations. Although these other influences are important, this paper deals with transaction cost motivations for vertical co‐ordination.
26If only one party (A) has made an asset specific investment, it is probably party A that will vertically integrate with the other party (B) because of the risk of B practising PCOB. Where both parties have made an asset specific investment, either vertical integration, a long‐term contract or a strategic alliance may result. The outcome will depend on other features of the transaction, such as the level of uncertainty.
27Levy, D.T., “The transactions cost approach to vertical integration: an empirical examination”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 67, 1985, pp. 438‐45.
28Frank, S.D. and Henderson, D., “Transaction costs as determinants of vertical coordination in US food industries”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 74 No. 4, 1992, pp. 941‐50.
29Barkema, A.D., “New roles and alliances in the U.S. food system”, presented at the spring meeting of the Federal Reserve System Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, Kansas City., MO, 20 May 1993.
30Sonka, S.T., New Industries in Agriculture: Concepts, Issues and Opportunities, mimeo, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, IL, 1992.
31Masten, S.E., “Transaction‐cost economics and the organization of agricultural transactions”, presented at the NC‐194 World Food Systems Project Symposium, Examining the Economic Theory Base for Vertical Coordination, Chicago, IL, 17‐18 October 1991.
32Lieberman, M., “Determinants of vertical integration: an empirical test”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 39 No. 5, 1991, p. 451‐66.
33Globerman, S. and Schwindt, R., “The organization of vertically related transactions in the Canadian forest products industries”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 7, 1986, pp. 199‐212.
34Matthews, R.C.O., “The economics of institutions and the sources of growth”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 96 No. 384, December 1986, pp. 903‐18.
35Coase, R.H., “Industrial organization: a proposal for research”, in Fuchs, V.R. (Ed.), Policy Issues and Research Opportunities in Industrial Organization, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, NY, 1972, pp. 59‐73.
36Hallwood, Transaction Costs and Trade between Multinational Corporations: A Study of Offshore Oil Production, Unwin Hyman, Boston, MA, 1990.
37Hobbs, J.E., “A transaction cost analysis of beef marketing in the UK”, unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, 1995.
38Clearly, other non‐transaction cost factors may influence a farmer’s choice of marketing channel. However, the purpose was to identify important transaction costs. Also, the transaction costs incurred by processors in purchasing finished beef cattle will affect their choice of supply channel, therefore influencing vertical co‐ordination in the supply chain. The same survey method could be used to identify the important transaction costs facing processors.
39Hair, J.F. Jr, Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and
Black, W.C.,Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 3rd ed., Macmillan, New York, NY, 1992.
40Steenkamp, J.B.E.M., “Conjoint measurement in ham quality evaluation”, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 38 No. 3, 1987, pp. 473‐80.
41Wittink, D.R., Vriens, M. and Burhenne, W., “Commercial uses of conjoint analysis in Europe: results and critical reflections”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 11 No. 1, 1994, pp. 41‐52.