Reduced set averaging of face identity in children and adolescents with autism

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology - Tập 68 Số 7 - Trang 1391-1403 - 2015
Gillian Rhodes1, Markus Neumann1, Louise Ewing1,2, Romina Palermo1
1ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
2Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK

Tóm tắt

Individuals with autism have difficulty abstracting and updating average representations from their diet of faces. These averages function as perceptual norms for coding faces, and poorly calibrated norms may contribute to face recognition difficulties in autism. Another kind of average, known as an ensemble representation, can be abstracted from briefly glimpsed sets of faces. Here we show for the first time that children and adolescents with autism also have difficulty abstracting ensemble representations from sets of faces. On each trial, participants saw a study set of four identities and then indicated whether a test face was present. The test face could be a set average or a set identity, from either the study set or another set. Recognition of set averages was reduced in participants with autism, relative to age- and ability-matched typically developing participants. This difference, which actually represents more accurate responding, indicates weaker set averaging and thus weaker ensemble representations of face identity in autism. Our finding adds to the growing evidence for atypical abstraction of average face representations from experience in autism. Weak ensemble representations may have negative consequences for face processing in autism, given the importance of ensemble representations in dealing with processing capacity limitations.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.003

American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Armann R., 2011, Journal of Vision, 11, 1, 10.1167/11.13.9

10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.001

10.1080/02643290903343149

10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.06.003

10.1016/j.tics.2012.02.007

10.3758/PBR.17.6.862

10.1002/aur.1381

10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01762.x

10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.008

10.1207/s15326942dn2703_6

10.1177/0956797612446350

10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001

10.1371/journal.pone.0081353

10.1111/desc.12007

10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.019

10.1080/17470210902811249

Frith U., 2003, Autism: Explaining the enigma, 2

10.1007/s10803-011-1411-x

10.1002/aur.93

10.1007/s10803-011-1190-4

10.1002/dev.10028

10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.039

10.1037/a0013899

10.1007/s10803-005-0039-0

10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.101

10.1080/13506280701350647

10.1017/S0954579401001080

10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.026

10.1038/82947

10.1016/S0278-2626(02)00016-7

10.1098/rspb.2005.3220

Lord C., 2012, Autism diagnostic observation schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) Manual (Part I): Modules 1–4

10.1007/s10803-005-0040-7

10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.006

10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.065

10.1080/09658210500233581

10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.030

10.1167/11.1.1

10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.002

10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.016

10.1037/a0035939

10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559053.001.0001

Rutter M., 2003, SCQ: Social communication questionnaire

10.1007/s10803-006-0076-3

10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.12.012

Stuart A., 1958, Advanced theory of statistics (Vol 1)

10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.009

10.1007/s10803-012-1695-5

10.1177/0956797613497969

10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559053.013.0043

10.1098/rstb.2010.0360

Wechsler D., 2003, Wechsler intelligence scale for children–fourth edition (WISC-IV)

10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.008