An analysis of grammatical patterns in generation 1.5, L1 and L2 students’ writings: A replication study
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abba, 2015
Bunch, 2017, Resident L2 learners in post-secondary writing: Toward profession-wide rethinking of persistent challenges, Colloquium at the Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics
Bunch, 2015, Integrating language, literacy, and academic development: Alternatives to traditional English as a second language and remedial English for language minority students in community colleges, Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 39, 20, 10.1080/10668926.2012.755483
Connerty, 2009
DeKeyser, 2010, Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition, Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 413, 10.1017/S0142716410000056
de Kleine, 2018, Linguistically diverse students, 215
Di Gennaro, 2009, Investigating differences in the writing performance of international and Generation 1.5 students, Language Testing, 26, 533, 10.1177/0265532209340190
Di Gennaro, 2013, How different are they? A comparison of Generation 1.5 and international L2 learners’ writing ability, Assessing Writing, 18, 154, 10.1016/j.asw.2013.01.003
Di Gennaro, 2016, Searching for differences and discovering similarities: Why international and resident second-language learners’ grammatical errors cannot serve as a proxy for placement into writing courses, Assessing Writing, 29, 1, 10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.001
Doolan, 2011, A language-related comparison of Generation 1.5 and L1 student writing, The CATESOL Journal, 22, 87
Doolan, 2013, Generation 1.5 writing compared to L1 and L2 writing of first-year composition, Written Communication, 30, 135, 10.1177/0741088313480823
Doolan, 2014, Comparing language use in the writing of developmental generation 1.5, L1, and L2 tertiary students, Written Communication, 31, 215, 10.1177/0741088314526352
Doolan, 2017, Comparing patterns of error in generation 1.5, L1 and L2 FYC writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.09.001
Doolan, 2012, Generation 1.5 written error patterns: A comparative study, Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 1, 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.09.001
1999
Larsen-Freeman, 2016
Levi, 2004
Mackey, 2012, Why (or why not), when and how to replicate research, 34
Makel, 2014, Facts are more important than novelty replication in the Education sciences, Educational Researcher, 43, 304, 10.3102/0013189X14545513
Matsuda, 2009, The erasure of resident ESL writers, 50
Menken, 2012, Spotlight on “long-term English language learners”: Characteristics and prior schooling experiences of an invisible population, International Multilingual Research Journal, 6, 121, 10.1080/19313152.2012.665822
Mikesell, 2007, Differences between Generation 1.5 and English as a second language writers: A corpus-based comparison of past participle use in academic writing, CATESOL Journal, 19, 7
Moyer, 2004, Age, accent, And experience in second language acquisition: An integrated approach to critical period inquiry, Vol. 7
Mu, 2016, Replication in L2 writing research: Journal of second language writing authors’ perceptions, TESOL Quarterly, 50, 201, 10.1002/tesq.284
2017
Patthey, 2009, 135
2012
Porte, 2012, Focus article: Replication in second language writing research, Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 284, 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.05.002
2015
2009
Saldaña, 2015
Scovel, 1988
Winerman, 2013, Interesting results: Can they be replicated?, Monitor on Psychology, 44