An analysis of grammatical patterns in generation 1.5, L1 and L2 students’ writings: A replication study

Journal of Second Language Writing - Tập 42 - Trang 12-24 - 2018
Christa de Kleine1, Rachele Lawton2
1School of Education, Notre Dame of Maryland University, 4701 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21010, USA
2Academic Literacy & Languages Department, the Community College of Baltimore County, 7201 Rossville Blvd, Baltimore, MD 21237, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abba, 2015 Bunch, 2017, Resident L2 learners in post-secondary writing: Toward profession-wide rethinking of persistent challenges, Colloquium at the Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics Bunch, 2015, Integrating language, literacy, and academic development: Alternatives to traditional English as a second language and remedial English for language minority students in community colleges, Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 39, 20, 10.1080/10668926.2012.755483 Connerty, 2009 DeKeyser, 2010, Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition, Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 413, 10.1017/S0142716410000056 de Kleine, 2018, Linguistically diverse students, 215 Di Gennaro, 2009, Investigating differences in the writing performance of international and Generation 1.5 students, Language Testing, 26, 533, 10.1177/0265532209340190 Di Gennaro, 2013, How different are they? A comparison of Generation 1.5 and international L2 learners’ writing ability, Assessing Writing, 18, 154, 10.1016/j.asw.2013.01.003 Di Gennaro, 2016, Searching for differences and discovering similarities: Why international and resident second-language learners’ grammatical errors cannot serve as a proxy for placement into writing courses, Assessing Writing, 29, 1, 10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.001 Doolan, 2011, A language-related comparison of Generation 1.5 and L1 student writing, The CATESOL Journal, 22, 87 Doolan, 2013, Generation 1.5 writing compared to L1 and L2 writing of first-year composition, Written Communication, 30, 135, 10.1177/0741088313480823 Doolan, 2014, Comparing language use in the writing of developmental generation 1.5, L1, and L2 tertiary students, Written Communication, 31, 215, 10.1177/0741088314526352 Doolan, 2017, Comparing patterns of error in generation 1.5, L1 and L2 FYC writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.09.001 Doolan, 2012, Generation 1.5 written error patterns: A comparative study, Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 1, 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.09.001 1999 Larsen-Freeman, 2016 Levi, 2004 Mackey, 2012, Why (or why not), when and how to replicate research, 34 Makel, 2014, Facts are more important than novelty replication in the Education sciences, Educational Researcher, 43, 304, 10.3102/0013189X14545513 Matsuda, 2009, The erasure of resident ESL writers, 50 Menken, 2012, Spotlight on “long-term English language learners”: Characteristics and prior schooling experiences of an invisible population, International Multilingual Research Journal, 6, 121, 10.1080/19313152.2012.665822 Mikesell, 2007, Differences between Generation 1.5 and English as a second language writers: A corpus-based comparison of past participle use in academic writing, CATESOL Journal, 19, 7 Moyer, 2004, Age, accent, And experience in second language acquisition: An integrated approach to critical period inquiry, Vol. 7 Mu, 2016, Replication in L2 writing research: Journal of second language writing authors’ perceptions, TESOL Quarterly, 50, 201, 10.1002/tesq.284 2017 Patthey, 2009, 135 2012 Porte, 2012, Focus article: Replication in second language writing research, Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 284, 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.05.002 2015 2009 Saldaña, 2015 Scovel, 1988 Winerman, 2013, Interesting results: Can they be replicated?, Monitor on Psychology, 44