Predator diversity and the functioning of ecosystems: the role of intraguild predation in dampening trophic cascades

Ecology Letters - Tập 8 Số 12 - Trang 1299-1306 - 2005
Deborah L. Finke1, Robert F. Denno1
1Department of Entomology University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Single trophic‐level studies of the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning highlight the importance of mechanisms such as resource partitioning, facilitation, and sampling effect. In a multi‐trophic context, trophic interactions such as intraguild predation may also be an important mediator of this relationship. Using a salt‐marsh food web, we investigated the interactive effects of predator species richness (one to three species) and trophic composition (strict predators, intraguild predators, or a mixture of the two) on ecosystem functions such as prey suppression and primary production via trophic cascades. We found that the trophic composition of the predator assemblage determined the impact of increasing predator species richness on the occurrence of trophic cascades. In addition, increasing the proportion of intraguild predator species present diminished herbivore suppression and reduced primary productivity. Therefore, trophic composition of the predator assemblage can play an important role in determining the nature of the relationship between predator diversity and ecosystem function.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00613.x

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00508.x

10.2307/1309989

10.1890/02-0550

10.2307/2963487

10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1443:BUFMNE]2.0.CO;2

10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00628.x

10.1007/978-1-4615-2395-6_11

10.1890/03-0239

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00494.x

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00474.x

Finke D.L.(2005).Predator diversity habitat complexity and the strength of terrestrial trophic cascades.Doctoral Dissertation.Department of Entomology University of Maryland College Park MD.

10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0643:IPDICS]2.0.CO;2

10.1046/j.1365-2311.2003.00475.x

10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0643:IPDICS]2.0.CO;2

10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930318.x

10.1086/319190

10.1006/jtbi.2002.3053

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00570.x

10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0704:TROCAC]2.0.CO;2

10.1007/s004420050180

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00698.x

10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00470.x

Langellotto G.(2002).The aggregation of invertebrate predators in complex habitats: ecological mechanisms and practical applications.Doctoral Dissertation.University of Maryland College Park MD.

10.1126/science.1064088

10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2143:PPPIEP]2.0.CO;2

10.1098/rspb.1998.0283

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00469.x

10.2307/1940637

10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2603:CSRAAB]2.0.CO;2

10.1007/PL00008855

10.1126/science.1069811

10.1038/47023

10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001501

Rosenheim J.A., 1998, Higher order predators and the regulation of insect herbivore populations, Ann. Rev. Entomol., 43, 421, 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.421

10.1007/BF00317517

SAS, 2002, SAS

10.1086/303311

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2003.00560.x

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00381.x

10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01437-2

10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0091:IBSAGN]2.0.CO;2

Snyder W.E., 2005, Ecology of Predator–Prey Interactions, 324

Straub C.S., Species identity dominates the relationship between predator biodiversity and herbivore suppression, Ecology

10.1126/science.277.5330.1300

Tilman D., 2002, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives, 21, 10.1093/oso/9780198515708.003.0003

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00331.x