Efficacy of Two Different Instructional Methods Involving Complex Ecological Content
Tóm tắt
Teaching and learning approaches in ecology very often follow linear conceptions of ecosystems. Empirical studies with an ecological focus consistent with existing syllabi and focusing on cognitive achievement are scarce. Consequently, we concentrated on a classroom unit that offers learning materials and highlights the existing complexity rather than following linear conceptions. We developed an educational unit consisting of 14 individual lessons (”ecosystem lake”) with the aim of increasing pupils’ cognitive achievement in 8th and 9th grade secondary schools. To evaluate our approach, we chose a quasi-experimental design and five teachers with ten classes participated in our study. A matched-pair tandem-design was provided by five German teachers using first his/her conventional approach in one class (instruction-1; control group) and second, our modern ecological approach in their second class (instruction-2). Pupils subjected to the latter performed better, i.e., achieved higher scores, especially in the delayed post-test. Further, we found a teacher effect and an interaction between treatment (i.e., whether treatment or control class) and the teacher regarding the class test. Teachers had a significant influence on the learning outcome irrespective of the educational unit, i.e., some teachers generally produced higher achievement than others. Further, the interaction showed that some teachers coped better with their traditional teaching. Nevertheless, in retention (delayed post-test) all classes of the modern approach scored higher than the traditionally taught ones. Boys and girls benefited equally from our program and pupils from the modern approach rated the educational unit better.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexander, P.A., Jetton, T.L. & Kulikowich, J.M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, interest and recall: assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 559–575.
Bailey, S. & Watson, R. (1998). Establishing basic ecological understanding in younger pupils: a pilot evaluation of a strategy based on drama/role play. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 139–152.
Berck, K.-H. (1999). Biologiedidaktik. Didactics of Biology. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
Bleicher, M., Fix, M., Fuß, S., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Laukenmann, M., Mayring, P., Melenk, H. & v. Rhöneck, C. (2001). Einfluss emotionaler Faktoren auf das Lernen in den Fächern Physik und Deutsch - erste Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojektes. Influence of emotional factors on learning in physics and German language - first results of the research project. In: Schnaitmann, G.W. & Finkbeiner, C. (Hrsg.), Lehren und Lernen im Kontext empirischer Forschung und Fachdidaktik (pp. 518–546). Donauwörth: Auer.
Bohl, T. (2001). Wie verbreitet sind offene Unterrichtsmethoden? How common are modern forms of instruction? Pädagogische Rundschau, 55, 217–287.
Bogner, F. (1998). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspectives. Journal of Environmental Education, 29, 17–29.
Carlsson, B. (2002). Ecological understanding 2: transformation - a key to ecological understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 701–705.
Clarke, G.M. (1969). Statistics and experimental design. London: Arnold.
Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press. 3.ed.
Duckworth, A.L. & Seligman, M.E.P. (2005). Self-Discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.
Einsiedler, W. & Treinies, G. (1997). Effects of teaching methods, class effects, and patterns of cognitive teacher-pupil interactions in an experimental study in primary school classes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 327–353.
Finke, E. (1998). Interesse an Humanbiologie und Umweltschutz in der Sekundarstufe I: empirische Untersuchung zu altersbezogenen Veränderungen und Anregungsfaktoren. Interest in human biology and environmental protection in secondary schools: empirical study of age-related changes. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.
Fraser, B.J., Walberg, H.J., Welch, W.W. & Hattie, J.A. (1987). Synthesis of educational productivity research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 145–252.
Giaconia, R.M. & Hedges, L.V. (1982). Identifying features of open education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Gläser-Zikuda, M., Fuß, S., Laukenmann, M., Metz, K. & Randler, C. (2005). Promoting students‘ emotions and achievement - Instructional design and evaluation of the ECOLE approach. Learning and Instruction, 15, 481–495.
Gribbons, B. & Herman, J. (1997). True and quasi-experimental designs. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 5(14), http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=5&n=14. ISSN: 1531–7714.
Guzzetti, B.J. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 117–159.
Hedges, L.V., Giaconia, R.M. & Gage, N.L. (1981). Meta-analysis of the effect of open and traditional instruction. Stanford University programme on teaching effectiveness. Stanford University: California.
Hidi, S. & Renninger, A.K. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.
Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls‘ interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12, 447–465.
Hoffmann, L. & Lehrke, M. (1986). Eine Untersuchung über Schülerinteresse an Physik und Technik. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 32, 189–204.
Johnson, M.A. & Lawson, A.E. (1998). What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 89–103.
Keeves, J.P. (1998). Methods and processes in research in science education. In: Fraser, J.B. & Tobin, K.G. (Ed.). International handbook of Science education. Part II. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
Kelly, A. (1988). The customer is always right girls’ and boys’ reactions to science lessons. School Science Review, 69, 662–676.
Kelly, G.J., Brown, C. & Crawford, T. (2000). Experiments, contingencies, and curriculum: Providing opportunities for learning through improvisation in science teaching. Journal of Science Education, 84, 624–657.
Killermann, W. (1996). Biology education in Germany: research into the effectiveness of different methods. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 333–346.
Killermann, W. & Rieger, W. (1996). Unterricht mit Video oder Mikroskop? Vergleichende empirische Untersuchungen zur Effizienz dieser Verfahren. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 2, 15–20.
Laukenmann, M., Bleicher, M., Fuß, S., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Mayring, P. & v. Rhoeneck, C. (2003). An investigation of the influence of emotional factors on learning in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 489–507.
Lazarowitz, R. (1981). Correlations of Junior High School Students’ age, gender, and intelligence with ability in construct classification in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 15–22.
Leach, J., Scott, P. & Wood-Robinson, C. (1995). Children’s ideas about ecology 1: theoretical background, design and methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 721–732.
Leach, J., Scott, P. & Wood-Robinson, C. (1996a). Children’s ideas about ecology 2: ideas found in children aged 5–16 about the cycling of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 19–34.
Leach, J., Scott, P. & Wood-Robinson, C. (1996b). Children’s ideas about ecology 3: ideas found in children aged 5–16 about the interdependency of organisms. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 129–141.
Lee, V.E. & Burkam, D.T. (1996). Gender differences in middle grade science achievement: subject domain, ability level, and course emphasis. Science Education, 80, 613–650.
Lord, T.R. (1997). A comparison between traditional and constructivist teaching in college biology. Innovative Higher Education, 21, 197–216.
Lord, T. (1998). Cooperative learning that really works in biology teaching. Using constructivist-based activities to challenge student teams. American Biology Teacher, 60/8, 580–588.
Lou, V., Abrami, P.C., Spence, J.C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B. & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423–458.
Meece, J.L. & Jones, M.G. (1996). Gender differences in motivation and strategy use in science: are girls rote learners? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 393–406.
Miller, S. (1984). Experimental design and statistics. London & New York: Methuen.
Morgan, D.C. (1999). Cooperative learning in the community college biology classroom. Issues of education at community colleges: Essays by fellows in the mid-career fellowship programme at Princeton University. Princeton: University Press.
Musheno, B.V. & Lawson, A.E. (1999). Effects of learning cycle and traditional text on comprehension of science concepts by students at differing reasoning levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36/1, 23–37.
Mwangi, W. & Sweller, J. (1998). Learning to solve complex word problems: The effect of example format and generating self-explanations. Cognition & Instruction, 16, 173–199.
Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W. & Boyie, R.A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change. The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.
Randler, C. & Bogner, F.X. (2002). Comparing methods of instruction using bird species identification skills as indicators. Journal of Biological Education, 36/4, 2–9.
Randler, C. & Bogner, F.X. (2006). Cognitive achievements in identification skills. Journal of Biological Education, 40, 161–165.
Randler, C. & Hulde, M. (2007). Hands-on versus teacher-centred experiments in soil ecology. Research in Science and Technological Education, 25, 329–338.
Randler, C., Ilg, A. & Kern, J. (2005). Cognitive and emotional evaluation of an amphibian conservation program for elementary school students. Journal of Environmental Education, 37, 43–52.
Schibeci, R.A. (1984). Attitudes to science: an update. Studies in Science Education, 11, 26–59.
Schiefele, U. & Rheinberg, F. (1997). Motivation and knowledge acquisition: Searching for mediating processes. Motivation and Achievement, 10, 251–301.
von Secker, C.E. & Lissitz, R.W. (1999). Estimating the impact of instructional practices on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1110–1126.
Shepardson, D.P. (2002). Bugs, butterflies, and spiders: children’s understandings about insects. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 627–643.
Slavin, R.E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50, 315–342.
Slavin, R.E. (1993). Kooperatives Lernen und Leistung: Eine empirisch fundierte Theorie. Cooperative learning and achievement: a theory based on empirical research. In G.L. Huber (Ed.), Neue Perspektiven der Kooperation. Schneider-Verlag: Hohengehren.
Stohr-Hunt, P.M. (1996). An analysis of frequency of hands-on experience and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 101–109.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J.J.G. & Paas, F.G.W. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10/3, 251–296.
Thair, M. & Treagust, D.F. (1997). A review of teacher development reforms in Indonesian secondary science: the effectiveness of practical work in biology. Research in Science Education, 27, 581–597.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D.J. & Gallard, A.J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In: Gabel, D.L. (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
Vernon, D.T.A. & Blake, R.L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68, 550–563.
Watson, S.B. (1991). Cooperative learning and group educational modules: effects on cognitive achievement of high school biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 41–46.
Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387–398.
Wise, K.C. & Okey, J.R. (1983). A meta-analysis of the effects of various science teaching strategies on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 419–435.
Wittrock, M.C. (1986). Handbook of research on teaching. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan.
Younger, M. & Warrington, M. (1996). Differential achievement of girls and boys at GCSE: some observations from the perspective of one school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17, 299–313.