Simulation Research Rubric: Further Analysis of Published Simulation Studies and Future Implications

Cheng, 2016, Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: Extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12, A3, 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.04.008 Cook, 2013, Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based Systematic review and meta-analysis, Medical Teacher, 35, e867, 10.3109/0142159X.2012.714886 Cook, 2011, Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: A systematic review, Medical Education, 45, 227, 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03890.x Fey, 2015, Assessing the quality of simulation-based research articles: A rating rubric, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11, 496, 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.10.005 Kardong-Edgren, 2010, A review of currently published evaluation instruments for human patient simulation, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6, e25, 10.1016/j.ecns.2009.08.004 Laschinger, 2008, Effectiveness of simulation on health profession students’ knowledge, skills, confidence and satisfaction, International Journal of Evidence- based Healthcare, 6, 278 Mariani, 2016, Nursing simulation research: What are the perceived gaps?, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12, 30, 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.11.004 Mariani, 2018, The simulation research rubric: A pilot study evaluating published simulation studies, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 22, 1, 10.1016/j.ecns.2018.06.003 Raemer, 2011, Research regarding debriefing as part of the learning process, Simulation in Healthcare, 6, S52, 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31822724d0 Shelestak, 2014, Examining validity, fidelity, and reliability of human patient simulation, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10, e257, 10.1016/j.ecns.2013.12.003