Flexibility in contract terms and contracting processes

Emerald - Tập 3 Số 3 - Trang 462-478 - 2010
Soili Nystén‐Haarala1, Nari Lee2, Jukka Lehto3
1Department of Law, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland
2Munich Intellectual Property Law Center, Munich, Germany
3Faculty of Law, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland

Tóm tắt

PurposeNew business models, such as life‐cycle contracting, challenge the narrow and static understanding of contracts with hard and precise terms. The aim of this paper is to examine how flexibility could be incorporated into contracting processes.Design/methodology/approachThe data of the paper have been gathered applying the triangular method; first, by interviewing key personnel participating in contracting at eight Finnish firms; second, examining contract and other documents of those companies; and third, studying earlier research on contracting practices. Theoretically, the paper is based on relational contract and proactive approaches to law on the one hand and on organizational studies based on new institutional economics on the other.FindingsFlexibility is often introduced to contracts with relational methods, relying on good personal relationships between business partners or negotiation power and negotiation skills. Contract documents often do not contain mechanisms for dealing with contingencies, or “soft” contract terms. The paper finds the following reasons that may explain this. First, firms heavily rely on model contracts to develop their own templates and the lack of contract models in new business areas hinders firms to develop their templates. Second, unfamiliarity with using soft elements makes it difficult to use them. Additionally, in some cases firms may prefer using relational capability.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings need verification from further multidisciplinary empirical research.Practical implicationsThe findings support firms in developing their contracting capabilities to meet the requirements of the changing business environment and gain competitive advantage from well‐organized contracting.Originality/valueThis paper is one of the first empirical studies comprising also the legal approach.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Annola, V. (2003), “Sopimuksen dynaamisuus: Talousoikeudellinen rakennetutkimus sopimuksen täydentämisestä ja täydentymisen ohjaamisesta”, Yksityisoikeuden julkaisusarja A: 107, Turun yliopiston oikeustieteellisen tiedekunnan julkaisuja, Turku. Argyres, N. and Mayer, K.J. (2004), “Learning to contract: evidence from the personal computer industry”, Organizational Science, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 394‐410. Argyres, N. and Mayer, K.J. (2007), “Contract designing as a firm capability: an integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 1060‐77. Artz, K.W. and Brush, T.H. (2000), “Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms: an examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 337‐62. Barnett, R.E. (1992), “The sound of silence: default rules and contractual consent”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 78, pp. 821‐911. Barton, T.D. (2009), Preventive Law and Problem Solving: Lawyering for the Future, Vandepals, Lake Mary, FL. Brown, L.M. (1950), Manual of Preventive Law, Prentice‐Hall, New York, NY. Buvik, A. and Haugland, S.A. (2005), “The allocation of specific assets, relationship duration, and contractual coordination in buyer‐seller relationships”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 41‐60. CCC Project Final Report (2008), Contracting Capabilities in Industrial Life‐cycle and Service Business, Project Final Report, available at: www.uef.fi/oikeustieteet/ccc. Coase, R. (1960), “The problem of social cost”, The Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 1‐44. Coase, R. (1988), The Firm, the Market and the Law, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Contracting Excellence IACCM Newsletter (2009), “The top negotiated terms: negotiators admit they are on wrong agenda”, Contracting Excellence IACCM Newsletter, July, available at: www.iaccm.com/contractingexcellence. Deakin, S. and Michie, J. (Eds) (1997), Contracts, Co‐operations and Competition, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Eckhard, B. and Mellewigt, T. (2006), “Contractual functions and contractual dynamics in inter‐firm relationships: what we know and how to proceed”, University of Padeborn Working Papers No. 88, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=899527. Gilson, R.J., Sabel, C.F. and Scott, R.E. (2009), “Contracting for innovation: vertical disintegration and interfirm collaboration”, Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 340; Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 368, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1289428. Goldberg, V.P. (2002), “Discretion in long‐term open quantity contracts: reining in good faith”, UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 35, pp. 319‐85. Haapio, H. (2004), Invisible Terms in International Sales and What to do About Them, National Contract Management Association, Fort Worth, TX, July, available at: www.mcmahg.org/files/Articles/81EEBinJuly0432pdf. Haapio, H. (2006), “Introduction to proactive law from a business lawyer's point of view”, in Wahlgren, P. (Ed.), A Proactive Approach, Scandinavian Studies in Law, Vol. 49, Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, Stockholm, pp. 21‐34. Haapio, H. (2007), “An ounce of prevention … proactive legal care for corporate contracting success”, Tidskrift utgiven av Juridiska Föreningen i Finland, Vol. 2007 No. 1, pp. 39‐68. Hadfield, G.K. (1990), “Problematic relations: franchising and the law of incomplete contracts”, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 42, pp. 927‐92. Kreitner, R. (2006), Calculating Promises: The Emergence of Modern American Contract Doctrine, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA. Lee, N. (2008), “From tangibles to intangibles – contracting capability for intangible innovation”, in Nystén‐Haarala, S. (Ed.), Corporate Contracting Capabilities, Conference Proceedings and other Writings, Joensuun yliopiston oikeustieteellisiä julkaisuja 21, Joensuu, pp. 33‐50. Lehto, J. (2008), “Modifications in different types of business contracting from the perspective of contract law and contracting practices”, in Nystén‐Haarala, S. (Ed.), Corporate Contracting Capabilities, Conference Proceedings and other Writings, Joensuun yliopiston oikeustieteellisiä julkaisuja 21, Joensuu, pp. 89‐102. Macaulay, S. (1963), “Non‐contractual relations in business: a preliminary study”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 28, pp. 55‐67. Macneil, I.R. (1978), “Contracts: adjustment of long‐term economic relations under classical, neoclassical and relational contract law”, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 72, pp. 854‐905. Macneil, I.R. and Gudel, P. (2001), Contracts: Exchange Transactions and Relations, 3rd ed., Foundation Press, New York, NY. North, D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. North, D.C. (2005), Understanding the Process of Institutional Change, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Nystén‐Haarala, S. (1998), The Long Term Contract. Contract Law and Contracting, Finnish Lawyers' Association, Helsinki. Nystén‐Haarala, S. (2008), “Why does contract law not recognize life‐cycle business? Mapping of challenges for future empirical research”, in Nystén‐Haarala, S. (Ed.), Corporate Contracting Capabilities, Conference Proceedings and other Writings, Joensuun yliopiston oikeustieteellisiä julkaisuja 21, Joensuu, pp. 18‐32. Pohjonen, S. (Ed.) (2002), Ennakoiva sopiminen. Liiketoiminnan suunnittelu, toteuttaminen ja riskien hallinta, WSOY Lakitieto, Helsinki. Poppo, L. and Zenger, T. (2002), “Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 707‐25. Pöyhönen, J. (2000), Uusi varallisuusoikeus, Lakimiesliiton kustannus, Helsinki. Rudanko, M. (1995), Pankkiasiakkaan ja pankin oikeussuoja, Publications of Helsinki University Institute of International Economic Law, Helsinki. Shelanski, H.A. and Klein, P.G. (1995), “Empirical research in transaction cost economics: a review and assessment”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 335‐61. Simon, H.A. (1997), Administrative Behavior, 4th ed., The Free Press, New York, NY. Teece, D.J. (2007), “Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature of microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28 No. 13, pp. 1319‐50. Wahlgren, P. (Ed.) (2006), A Proactive Approach, Scandinavian Studies in Law, Vol. 49, Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, Stockholm. Walker, D.H.T. and Hampson, K.D. (2003), “Project alliancing member organisation selection”, in Walker, D.H.T. and Hampson, D. (Eds), Procurement Strategies: A Relationship Based Approach, Ch. 4, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 74‐102. Wang, X. and Liu, L. (2007), “Cultural barriers to the use of western project management in Chinese enterprises: some empirical evidence form Yunnan province”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 61‐76. Williamson, O.E. (1985), Economic Institutions of Capitalism, The Free Press, New York, NY. Williamson, O.E. (1999), “Strategy research: governance and competence perspective”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, pp. 1087‐108. Zamir, E. (1997), “The inverted hierarchy of contract interpretation”, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 97, pp. 1710‐803. Charny, D. (1991), “Hypothetical bargains: the normative structure of contract interpretation”, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 89, pp. 1815‐79. Haapio, H., Af Hällström, E., Järvinen, M., Koivu, S., Lehto, J., Leskinen, J., Lintumaa, S., Nysten‐Haarala, S., Pohjonen, S., Salmi‐Tolonen, T. and Ja Taivalmaa, P. (2005), Yritysten sopimus‐ ja vastuuketjut, Sopimusten hallinta käytännössä, Tietosanoma.
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 3 Số 3

462-478

Thông tin tác giả