Case-crossover design: Air pollution and health outcomes
Tóm tắt
The objective of this study was to investigate variants of case-crossover design for assessing correlations between counts of health events over time and exposure to ambient air pollution. For illustrative purposes, daily emergency department (ED) visits for depression among females were considered. Ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was used as a principal ambient air pollutant. In addition, sulphur dioxide (SO2) and carbon monoxide (CO) were considered. Different configurations of the control periods (every 1, 2, …, 10 days) and different forms (linear, natural splines) of meteorological factors in the applied conditional logistic regression models were used. The sequence of overlapping age intervals was defined ([0, 19], [1, 20], and so on) and each age group was analyzed separately. The results for the defined age sequences allow identifying age ranges in which the effects are strongest. Consequently, for example, different age ranges for patients for which ED visits for depression were correlated with NO2 and SO2 were identified. This age-interval difference explains the very often observed phenomenon whereby two air pollutants used in one model may not show correlations with health outcomes. In this situation they affect separate age groups. The results also show dependency on number-defined control periods for the applied case-crossover technique. The opposite statistical conclusions may be generated by using different control schemas. The results support the hypothesis that ED visits for depressive disorder may be correlated with exposure to ambient air pollution.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bell ML, Ebisu K, Peng RD, Walker J, Samet JM, Zeger SL, et al. Seasonal and regional short-term effects of fine particles on hospital admissions in 202 US counties, 1999–2005. Am J Epidemiol 2008;168(11):1301–1310.
Ko FW, Tam W, Wong TW, Chan DP, Tung AH, Lai CK, et al. Temporal relationship between air pollutants and hospital admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Hong Kong. Thorax 2007;62(9):780–785.
Dominici F, Peng RD, Bell ML, Pham L, McDermott A, Zeger SL, et al. Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. J Am Med Assoc 2006;295(10):1127–1134.
Samet JM, Dominici F, Curriero FC, Coursac I, Zeger SL. Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987–1994. N Engl J Med 2000;343(24):1742–1749.
Pope CA 3rd, Burnett RT, Thurston GD, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, et al. Cardiovascular mortality and long-term exposure to particulate air pollution: epidemiological evidence of general pathophysiological pathways of disease. Circulation 2004;109(1):71–77.
Maclure M. The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. Am J Epidemiol 1991;133(2):144–153.
Janes H, Sheppard L, Lumley T. Case-crossover analyses of air pollution exposure data. Referent selection strategies and their implications for bias. Epidemiology 2005;16(6):717–726.
Szyszkowicz M. Air pollution and emergency department visits for depression in Edmonton, Canada. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2007;21:1–5.
Franklin M, Zeka A, Schwartz J. Association between PM2.5 and all-cause and specific-cause mortality in 27 US communities. J Expo Scid Environ Epidemiol 2007;17:279–287.
Gelman A, Stern H. The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. Am Stat 2006;60(4):328–331.