Teaching styles and pupil progress

allen, D. I. Some effects of program openness, classroom type, and teachers' need for structure on children's attitude and self-esteem. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., 1976. Argyris, C. Dangers in applying results from experimental social psychology.American Psychologist, 1975,30, 469–485. Bennett, S. N., & Jordan, J. A typology of teaching styles in primary schools.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,45, 20–28. Charters, W. W., & Jones, J. E. On the risk of appraising non-events in program evaluation.Educational Research, 1973,2 (Nov.), 5–7. Cronbach, L. J. The logic of experiments on discovery. In L. S. Shulman & E. R. Keislar (Eds.),Learning by discovery: A critical appaaisal. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966. Pp. 77–92. Friedlander, B. Z. Some remarks on “open education”.American Educational Research Journal, 1975,12, 465–468. Hunt, D. E.Matching models in education. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1971. Hunt, D. E. Teachers are psychologists, too: On the application of psychology to education.Canadian Psychological Review, 1976,17, 210–218. (a) Hunt, D. E. Teachers' adaptation: “Reading” and “flexing” to students.Journal of Teacher Education, 1976,27, 268–275. (b) Hunt, D. E., & Sullivan, E. V.Between psychology and education. Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden, 1974. Larter, S. The measurement and comparison of small group skills and sociability in schools differing in program and architecture openness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, 1976. Morgan, M. T., & Robinson, N. R. The “back to the basics” movement in education.Canadian Journal of Education, 1976,1(2), 1–11. Traub, R., Weiss, J., & Fisher, C.Openness in schools. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1976.