Creativity and interdisciplinarity: one creativity or many creativities?
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Achter, J. A., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1996). Multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: It was never there and already it’s vanishing. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 65–76.
Achter, J. A., Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1997). Rethinking multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: A critical review and recommendations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 5–15.
Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Baer, J. (1994). Why you shouldn’t trust creativity tests. Educational Leadership, 51, 80–83.
Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177.
Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Talent development in an age of situated approaches to learning and thinking. Educational Psychologist, 37, 165–182.
Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Creativity: Shifting across ontological categories flexibly. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 209–234). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domains of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–214). London: Sage.
Dollinger, S. J., & Shafran, M. (2005). Note on consensual assessment technique in creativity research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 592–598.
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to expert performance: Empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1988). Creative lives and creative works: A synthetic scientific approach. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 298–324). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Holland, J. L., & Nichols, R. C. (1964). Prediction of academic and extracurricular achievement in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 55–65.
Holland, J. L., & Richards, J. M., Jr. (1965). Academic and nonacademic accomplishment: Correlated or uncorrelated? Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 165–174.
Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 389–403.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Hawking’s haiku, Madonna’s math: Why it is hard to be creative in every room of the house. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–328). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal (in press).
Kerr, B. A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
Kerr, B. (1991). A handbook for counseling the gifted and talented. Alexandria: American Association for Counseling and Development.
Kogan, N. (1994). Diverging from divergent thinking (Review of the book Divergent thinking and creativity: A task specific approach). Contemporary Psychology, 39, 291–292.
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.
Legree, P. J., Pifer, M. E., & Grafton, F. C. (1996). Correlations among cognitive abilities are lower for high ability groups. Intelligence, 23, 54–57.
Lim, W., & Plucker, J. (2001). Creativity through a lens of social responsibility: Implicit theories of creativity with Korean samples. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 115–130.
Lin, C., Hu, W., Adey, P., & Shen, J. (2003). The influence of CASE on scientific creativity. Research in Science Education, 33, 143–162.
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Ryan, J. (1995). Stability of vocational interests among the intellectually gifted from adolescence to adulthood: A 15-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 90–94.
Milgram, R. M., & Hong, E. (1999). Multipotential abilities and vocational interests in gifted adolescents: Fact or fiction? International Journal of Psychology, 34, 81–93.
Milgram, R. M., & Livne, N. L. (2005). Creativity as a general and a domain-specific ability: The domain of mathematics as an exemplar. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 187–204). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2008). The role of the family in talent development. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psycho-educational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 53–70). New York: Springer.
Pask-McCartney, C., & Salomone, P. R. (1988). Difficult cases in career counseling: III. The multipotentialed client. Career Development Quarterly, 36, 231–240.
Piirto, J. (2005). The creative process in poets. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 1–22). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179–182.
Plucker, J. A. (1999). Reanalyses of student responses to creativity checklists: Evidence of content generality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 126–137.
Plucker, J. A. (2005). The (relatively) generalist view of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 307–312). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Plucker, J., & Barab, S. A. (2005). The importance of contexts in theories of giftedness: Learning to embrace the messy joys of subjectivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. A. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 201–216). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Plucker, J., & Beghetto, R. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Plucker, J., & Stocking, V. (2001). Looking outside and inside: Self-concept development of gifted adolescents. Exceptional Children, 67, 535–548.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologists, 39, 83–96.
Plucker, J. A., Kaufman, J. C., Temple, J. S., & Qian, M. (2008). Do experts and novices evaluate movies the same way? Psychology & Marketing (in press).
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.
Renzulli, J. S. (1988). Technical report of research studies related to the Revolving Door Identification Model (2nd ed., Vol. II). Storrs, CT: Bureau of Educational Research and Service. The University of Connecticut.
Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center: Creative Learning Press.
Robinson, N. M. (1997). The role of universities and colleges in educating gifted undergraduates. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 217–236.
Runco, M. A., & Bahleda, M. D. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 93–98.
Runco, M. A., & Vega, L. (1990). Evaluating the creativity of children’s ideas. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 439–452.
Runco, M. A., Johnson, D. J., & Bear, P. K. (1993). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91–113.
Runco, M. A., McCarthy, K. A., & Svenson, E. (1994). Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists. The Journal of Psychology, 128, 23–31.
Rysiew, K. J., Shore, B. M., & Leeb, R. T. (1999). Multipotentiality, giftedness, and career choice: A review. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 423–430.
Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Simonton, D. K. (2005). Creativity in psychology: On becoming and being a great psychologist. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 139–151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Publishers
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627.
Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The domain generality versus specificity debate: How should it beposed? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 299–306). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1995). The nature of insight. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Tardif, T. Z., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). What do we know about creativity? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 429–440). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexington: Ginn.
Weisberg, R. Q. (1993). Creativity beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.