Effects of Search Timing on Innovation: The Value of Not Being in Sync with Rivals

Administrative Science Quarterly - Tập 53 Số 4 - Trang 593-625 - 2008
Riitta Katila1, Eric L. Chen2
1Stanford University
2Halozyme Therapeutics;

Tóm tắt

This paper investigates the effects on product innovation of firms' search to innovate, taking into account how a firm's search relates to that of its competitors. Drawing on organizational learning theory, we hypothesize that search timing relative to competitors matters and test two seemingly contradictory views: that competitors take away the exclusivity of search and therefore suppress innovation or, in contrast, sharpen and validate the focal firm's search and thus promote innovation. Our analysis of 15 years of longitudinal data on 124 Japanese, European, and U.S. industrial automation organizations reconciles these views. Results show that firms introduce more new products if they search after their competitors do, and they introduce more innovative new products if they search ahead of their competitors. The most innovative firms combine these two approaches, bridging their own and their rivals' hitherto isolated clusters of knowledge, but avoid engaging in learning contests in which they search at the same time as their rivals. The key insight for innovating firms, then, is not necessarily to strive to perform as well as possible in absolute terms, but to be different from the competition.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/smj.157

10.1002/smj.401

10.1016/0040-1625(85)90058-7

10.1287/orsc.13.2.147.534

10.2307/2393511

Argote L., 1999, Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge

10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00033-X

10.2307/1056804

10.2307/2393811

10.2307/3094892

10.2307/3094913

10.2307/2235494

10.1111/1467-937X.00097

10.1108/01443579210009023

Brossia C., 1983, “Technology forecasting based on patent trend analysis using robotics technology as a case study”

10.5465/amr.1995.9507312922

Brown S., 1998, Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos

10.1086/288764

Chen E., 2008, Blackwell Handbook on Technology and Innovation Management, 197

10.2307/2534453

Cockburn I., Griliches Z. 1987 “Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market's valuation of R&D and patents”. NBER Working Paper no 2465.

10.1016/0048-7333(95)00842-X

Csikszentmihalyi M., 1996, Creativity

Cyert R., 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm

10.1002/9780470172506.ch24

Darlington R., 1990, Regression and Linear Models

10.2469/faj.v55.n3.2269

10.1016/0040-1625(85)90056-3

10.2307/256994

10.2307/256992

10.2307/2393315

Greene W., 2000, Econometric Analysis

10.2307/30040661

10.2307/2666979

Griliches Z., 1990, Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661

Grupp H., 1990, Measuring the Dynamics of Technological Change, 106

10.1086/210179

10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786083

10.2307/2393735

10.2307/1912352

Heckman J. J., 1980, Econometrica, 47, 247

10.1287/mnsc.40.12.1720

10.2307/2555761

10.2307/2555791

10.1017/CBO9780511618055

10.1002/smj.4250090607

10.1287/orsc.2.1.88

Hughes T., 1983, Networks of Power, 79, 10.56021/9780801828737

Hunt D., 1983, Industrial Robotics Handbook

10.1109/17.403744

10.2307/2097958

10.1016/0048-7333(89)90007-3

Kamien M., 1982, Market Structure and Innovation

Katila R., 2000, “In search of innovation: Search determinants of new product introductions”

10.2307/3069326

10.2307/3069433

10.2189/asqu.53.2.295

10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803924

10.1016/0737-6782(87)90003-8

10.1287/mnsc.48.2.171.253

10.1287/orsc.3.3.383

10.1287/orsc.3.1.47

10.5465/AMR.2007.23464011

10.1016/0167-2681(81)90012-3

10.1002/smj.4250141009

10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535

10.1093/biomet/73.1.13

10.5465/AMR.2006.20208686

Madsen T., Mosakowski E., Zaheer S. 1997 “Intrafirm evolutionary processes and competitive advantage”. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Boston.

10.1086/258914

10.1007/978-3-642-95597-6_11

10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

March J. G., 1958, Organizations

Markides C., 2005, Fast Second: How Smart Companies Bypass Radical Innovation to Enter and Dominate New Markets

Marklund P.-O., 1986, Industrial Robot, 15

10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00037-1

McDermott K., Alexander M. 1984 “Industrial robots/Form and function”. Industrial Engineering Conference Proceedings, Fall: 66–72.

10.1002/smj.4250140202

10.1287/orsc.7.1.88

10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00066-3

Nelson R. N., 1973, American Economic Review, 63, 440

Nelson R. N., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change

10.1287/mnsc.49.2.211.12747

Paredis J., 1997, Proceedings of ICGA VII, 393

10.1086/230637

10.1086/230994

Porter M. E., 1985, Competitive Advantage

10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1

10.2307/3069377

Romanelli E., 1985, “Performance and persistence of new firm strategies in organizational evolution: The case of minicomputers”

10.4135/9781452204703.n5

10.1002/smj.160

10.1016/0048-7333(85)90015-0

Scherer F. M., 1980, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance

Schumpeter J., 1934, Theory of Economic Development

10.1016/0883-9026(92)90033-N

10.1287/orsc.1050.0116

Simon H., 1957, Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization

10.2307/2666980

10.5465/APBPP.2001.6132933

10.2307/257002

10.1002/smj.4250171105

10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083029

10.1086/261611

10.2307/41165852

United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE), Working Party on Engineering Industries and Automation, and International Federation of Robotics, 1996, World Industrial Robots

Utterback J., 1994, Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation

Van Valen L., 1973, Evolutionary Theory, 1, 1

Walker R., 1995, Patents as Scientific and Technical Literature

10.1016/0167-2681(84)90004-0

10.5465/AMR.1991.4278990

10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Administrative Science Quarterly

Tập 53 Số 4

593-625

Thông tin tác giả