Evolving Trends in Liver Transplant for Metabolic Liver Disease in the United States

Liver Transplantation - Tập 25 Số 6 - Trang 911-921 - 2019
Patrick McKiernan1,2, Armando Ganoza3, James E. Squires1,2, Robert H. Squires1,2, Jerry Vockley4, George Mazariegos3, Kyle Soltys3, Qing Sun3, Rakesh Sindhi3
1Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition,University of Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh,PA
2Pittsburgh Liver Research Center,University of Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh,PA
3Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation,University of Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh,PA
4Division of Medical Genetics,Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh,PA

Tóm tắt

Indications for liver transplantation (LT) in metabolic disease are evolving. We reviewed the US experience with primary LT for metabolic disease in the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (October 1987 to June 2017) to determine the following: temporal changes in indications, longterm outcomes, and factors predicting survival. Patients were grouped by the presence of structural liver disease (SLD) and whether the defect was confined to the liver. There were 5996 patients who underwent LT for metabolic disease, 2354 (39.3%) being children. LT for metabolic disease increased in children but not in adults. Children experienced a 6‐fold increase in LT for metabolic disease without SLD. Indications for LT remained stable in adults. Living donor liver transplantation increased between era 1 and era 3 from 5.6% to 7.6% in children and 0% to 4.5% in adults. Patient and graft survival improved with time. The latest 5‐year patient survival rates were 94.5% and 81.5% in children and adults, respectively. Outcomes were worse in adults and in those with extrahepatic disease (< 0.01), whereas SLD did not affect outcomes. Survival improved with younger age at LT until age <2 years. On multivariate analysis, diagnostic category, inpatient status, age at LT, and transplant era significantly predicted outcomes in all ages with male sex predicting survival in childhood only. Children without structural disease were less likely to die awaiting LT and had improved post‐LT survival compared with children with chronic liver disease. In conclusion, LT for metabolic disease is increasingly used for phenotypic correction in children; extrahepatic manifestations significantly impact survival at all ages; where indicated, transplantation should not be unnecessarily delayed; and the development of new allocation models may be required.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2017, OPTN/SRTR 2015 annual data report: liver, Am J Transplant, 17, 174

2011, Paediatric liver transplantation for metabolic disorders. Part 1: Liver‐based metabolic disorders without liver lesions, Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 35, 194, 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.01.006

2014, Liver transplantation for pediatric metabolic disease, Mol Genet Metab, 111, 418, 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.01.006

2013, Liver transplantation and cell therapies for inborn errors of metabolism, J Inherit Metab Dis, 36, 675, 10.1007/s10545-012-9581-z

2009, Pediatric liver transplantation for metabolic liver disease: experience at King's College Hospital, Transplantation, 87, 87, 10.1097/TP.0b013e31818bc0c4

2017, Health‐related quality of life after pediatric liver transplantation: a systematic review, Liver Transpl, 23, 361, 10.1002/lt.24696

2010, Liver transplantation in children with metabolic diseases: the studies of pediatric liver transplantation experience, Pediatr Transplant, 14, 796, 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01339.x

2003, Liver transplantation in children with metabolic disorders in the United States, Am J Transplant, 3, 334, 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00058.x

2012, Hemodynamic changes during the anhepatic phase in pediatric patient with biliary atresia versus glycogen storage disease undergoing living donor liver transplantation, Transplant Proc, 44, 473, 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.062

2015, Early and late complications after liver transplantation for propionic acidemia in children: a two centers study, Am J Transplant, 15, 786, 10.1111/ajt.13027

2012, Long‐term impact of liver transplantation on respiratory function and nutritional status in children and adults with cystic fibrosis, Am J Transplant, 12, 954, 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03904.x

2004, Ten years of international experience with liver transplantation for familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy: results from the Familial Amyloidotic Polyneuropathy World Transplant Registry, Transplantation, 77, 64, 10.1097/01.TP.0000092307.98347.CB

2011, Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a single‐center experience of living‐donor liver transplantation during two decades in Japan, Clin Transplant, 25, 776, 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01368.x

2011, Paediatric liver transplantation for metabolic disorders. Part 2: metabolic disorders with liver lesions, Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 35, 271, 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.01.008

2009, Renal function recovery in children undergoing combined liver kidney transplants, Transplantation, 87, 1584, 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a4e710

2011, Pre‐emptive liver transplantation for primary hyperoxaluria (PH‐I) arrests long‐term renal function deterioration, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 26, 354, 10.1093/ndt/gfq353

2012, Too late to say it is too early–how to get children with non‐cirrhotic metabolic diseases transplanted at the right time?, Pediatr Transplant, 16, 671, 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2011.01623.x

2015, Outcomes in liver transplantation: does sex matter?, J Hepatol, 62, 946, 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.023

2016, Is severe progressive liver disease caused by alpha‐1‐antitrypsin deficiency more common in children or adults?, Liver Transpl, 22, 886, 10.1002/lt.24434

2013, Prospective multicenter clinical trial of immunosuppressive drug withdrawal in stable adult liver transplant recipients, Hepatology, 58, 1824, 10.1002/hep.26426

2017, Global lessons in graft type and pediatric liver allocation: a path toward improving outcomes and eliminating wait‐list mortality, Liver Transpl, 23, 86, 10.1002/lt.24646

2006, National and regional analysis of exceptions to the Pediatric End‐Stage Liver Disease scoring system (2003‐2004), Liver Transpl, 12, 40, 10.1002/lt.20662

2005, Living donor liver transplantation for pediatric patients with inheritable metabolic disorders, Am J Transplant, 5, 2754, 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01084.x

2015, Liver transplantation using grafts with rare metabolic disorders, Dig Liver Dis, 47, 261, 10.1016/j.dld.2014.11.004

2015, Living related transplantation for MSUD–caution, or a new path forward?, Pediatr Transplant, 19, 247, 10.1111/petr.12423

2011, Operative risks of domino liver transplantation for the familial amyloid polyneuropathy liver donor and recipient: a double analysis, Am J Transplant, 11, 759, 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03477.x

2012, Domino liver transplantation: how far can we push the paradigm?, Liver Transpl, 18, 22, 10.1002/lt.22443

2016, Successful domino liver transplantation from a patient with methylmalonic acidemia, JIMD Rep, 25, 87

2015, A metabolic chimera: two defective genotypes make a normal phenotype, Liver Transpl, 21, 1453, 10.1002/lt.24202

2014, Early nitisinone treatment reduces the need for liver transplantation in children with tyrosinaemia type 1 and improves post‐transplant renal function, J Inherit Metab Dis, 37, 745, 10.1007/s10545-014-9683-x

1998, Minimal criteria for placement of adults on the liver transplant waiting list: a report of a national conference organized by the American Society of Transplant Physicians and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Transplantation, 66, 956, 10.1097/00007890-199810150-00034