Application of the prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ assay for rapid prenatal detection of sex chromosome mosaicism

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 297 - Trang 1423-1438 - 2022
Min Zhang1, LingJi Chen1, Meihuan Chen1, Yan Wang1, Bin Liang1, Na Lin1, Xiaoqing Wu1, Linshuo Wang1, Liangpu Xu1, Hailong Huang1
1Medical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center of Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou City, China

Tóm tắt

The prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ (BoBs) assay was introduced for rapid detection of abnormalities of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y and specific nine significant microdeletion syndromes. The ability of prenatal BoBs to detect mosaicism ranged from 20 to 40%. However, there have been no prenatal studies of sex chromosome mosaicism in prenatal BoBs. Therefore, the present study was performed with an aim to uncover the detection level of sex chromosome mosaicism that application of prenatal BoBs assay, and then to assess the sensitivity of prenatal BoBs assay, thereby improving the prenatal diagnostic accuracy. A total of 31 samples of amniotic fluid (AF) and umbilical cord blood (UCB) for prenatal diagnosis were collected, and the results were confirmed through karyotyping, single nucleotide polymorphism microarray (SNP-array) and copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq). 23 cases of sex chromosome mosaicism were prompted abnormal by prenatal BoBs, the minimum detection level of mosaicism was about 6% as detected by karyotype. The overall sensitivity of prenatal BoBs in the detection of sex chromosome mosaicism was 74.2% (23/31). This study evaluated the effectiveness of prenatal BoBs for detecting sex chromosome mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis, and the results will provide valuable information for genetic counseling.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Armstrong JM, Malhotra NR, Lau GA (2020) Seminoma in a young phenotypic female with turner syndrome 45,XO/46,XY mosaicism: a case report with review of the literature. Urology 139 Artemis M, Georgia N, Marianna T, Kimon S, Lina M (2018) A spontaneous pregnancy in a patient with Turner Syndrome with 45,X/47,XXX mosaicism: a case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol S1083318818302572 Calanchini M, Aye CYL, Orchard E, Baker K, Turner HE (2020) Fertility issues and pregnancy outcomes in Turner syndrome. Fertil Steril 114(1):144–154 Cheng YK, Wong C, Wong HK, Leung KO, Kwok YK, Suen A et al (2013) The detection of mosaicism by prenatal BoBs. Prenat Diagn 33(1):42–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4006 Donaghue C, Mann K, Docherty Z, Ogilvie CM (2005) Detection of mosaicism for primary trisomies in prenatal samples by QF-PCR and karyotype analysis. Prenat Diagn 25(1):65–72 Gravholt CH, Andersen NH, Conway GS, Dekkers OM, Geffner ME, Klein KO, International Turner Syndrome Consensus G (2017) Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: proceedings from the 2016 Cincinnati International Turner Syndrome Meeting. Eur J Endocrinol 177(3):G1–G70. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0430 Gross SJ, Bajaj K, Garry D, Klugman S, Karpel BM, Roe AM et al (2011) Rapid and novel prenatal molecular assay for detecting aneuploidies and microdeletion syndromes. Prenat Diagn 31(3):259–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2674 Hook EB (1977) Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use. Am J Hum Genet 29(1):94–97 Hsu LYF, Yu MT, Richkind KE, Dyke DLV, Crandall BF, Saxe DF et al (1996) Incidence and significance of chromosome mosaicism involving an autosomal structural abnormality diagnosed prenatally through amniocentesis: a collaborative study. Prenat Diagn 16(1):1–28 Huang H, Zhang M, Wang Y, Lin N, He D, Chen M, et al (2017) Application of the BACs-on-Beads TM assay for rapid prenatal detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions: application of BoBs TM for PND. Mol Reprod Dev Hyde KJ, Schust DJ (2015) Genetic considerations in recurrent pregnancy loss. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 5(3):a023119. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a023119 Kamel AK, Abd El-Ghany HM, Mekkawy MK, Makhlouf MM, Mazen IM, El Dessouky N et al (2015) Sex chromosome mosaicism in the gonads of DSD patients: a karyotype/phenotype correlation. Sex Dev 9(5):279–288. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442332 Li C, Chen B, Zheng J, Cheng L, Zhang J (2018) Prenatal diagnosis of BACs-on-beads assay in 3647 cases of amniotic fluid cells. Reprod Sci 26(9):193371911880441 Lim HH, Kil HR, Koo SH (2017) Incidence, puberty, and fertility in 45, X/47, XXX mosaicism: report of a patient and a literature review. Am J Med Genet Part A 173(7):1961–1964 Liu XY, Zhang HG, Chen S, Wang RX, Zhang ZH, Liu RZ (2013) 45, X mosaicism in northeast China: a clinical report and review of the literature. J Assist Reprod Genet 30(3):407–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9927-3 Lund ICB, Becher N, Christensen R, Petersen OB, Vogel I (2019) Prevalence of mosaicism in uncultured chorionic villus samples after chromosomal microarray and clinical outcome in pregnancies affected by confined placental mosaicism. Prenatal Diagn 40(2) Ma N, Xi H, Chen J, Peng Y, Jia Z, Yang S et al (2021) Integrated CNV-seq, karyotyping and SNP-array analyses for effective prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism. BMC Med Genomics 14(1):56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-021-00899-x Pinto IP, Minasi LB, Steckelberg R, da Silva CC, da Cruz AD (2018) Mosaic Tetrasomy of 9p24.3q21.11 postnatally identified in an infant born with multiple congenital malformations: a case report. BMC Pediatr 18(1):298. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1275-8 Prakash SK, Crenshaw ML, Backeljauw PF, Silberbach M, Scurlock C, Culin DD et al (2018) 45,X mosaicism in a population-based biobank: implications for Turner syndrome. Genet Med Rosenfeld JA, Morton SA, Hummel C, Sulpizio SG, Mcdaniel LD, Schultz RA et al (2014) Experience using a rapid assay for aneuploidy and microdeletion/microduplication detection in over 2,900 prenatal specimens. Fetal Diagn Ther 36(3):231–241 Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G (2002) Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 30(12):e57. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gnf056 Shen G, Madison J, Van d VIB, Sandra P, Janice S, Amy B (2018) Chromosomal microarray analysis on uncultured chorionic villus sampling can be complicated by confined placental mosaicism for aneuploidy and microdeletions. Prenatal Diagn 38 Tokita MJ, Sybert VP (2016) Postnatal outcomes of prenatally diagnosed 45, X/46, XX. Am J Med Genet Part A 170:1196 Tuke MA, Ruth KS, Wood AR, Beaumont RN, Tyrrell J, Jones SE et al (2019) Mosaic Turner syndrome shows reduced penetrance in an adult population study. Genet Med 21(4):877–886. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0271-6 Vermeesch JR, Fiegler H, de Leeuw N, Szuhai K, Schoumans J, Ciccone R et al (2007) Guidelines for molecular karyotyping in constitutional genetic diagnosis. Eur J Hum Genet 15(11):1105–1114. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201896 Vialard F, Simoni G, Aboura A, De Toffol S, Molina Gomes D, Marcato L et al (2011) Prenatal BACs-on-Beads : a new technology for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 31(5):500–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2727 Weidler EM, Pearson M, Leeuwen KV, Garvey E (2019) Clinical management in mixed gonadal dysgenesis with chromosomal mosaicism: considerations in newborns and adolescents. Semin Pediatr Surg 28(5):150841 Zahir FR, Marra MA (2015) Use of affymetrix arrays in the diagnosis of gene copy-number variation. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 85. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142905.hg0813s85 Zheng J, Yang X, Lu H, Guan Y, Yang F, Xu M et al (2019) Prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome mosaicism with two marker chromosomes in three cell lines and a review of the literature. Mol Med Rep 19(3):1791–1796. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.9798