Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: a qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of when and how they matter

BMC Family Practice - Tập 7 Số 1 - 2006
Bruce Guthrie1, Sally Wyke2
1Tayside Centre for General Practice, University of Dundee, MacKenzie Building, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, DD2 4BF, UK
2Self Care Alliance, University of Stirling, Room 4T10, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background Personal continuity is a core value for family practice, but policy and performance targets emphasise other aspects of care, particularly waiting times for consultation. This study examined patient and general practitioner (GP) perceptions of the value of personal continuity and rapid access, and the relationship between them. Methods Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 16 GPs and 32 patients in the Lothian region of Scotland, to identify whether, how, why and in which circumstances personal continuity and rapid access were valued. Results From the patients' perspective, what mattered was 'access to appropriate care' depending on the problem to be dealt with. For a few patients, rapid access was the only priority. For most, rapid access was balanced against greater involvement in the consultation when seeing 'their' trusted doctor, which was particularly valued for chronic, complex and emotional problems. GPs focused on the value of personal continuity in the consultation for improving the diagnosis and management of the same kinds of problem. GPs did not perceive enabling access to be a core part of their work. There was little evidence that GPs routinely discussed with patients when or how personal continuity and access should be balanced. Conclusion 'Access to appropriate care' from the patients' perspective is not fully addressed by GPs' focus on personal continuity, nor by performance targets focused only on speed of access. GPs need to make enabling access as much a part of their core values as personal continuity, and access targets need to be based on less simplistic measures that account for the appropriateness of care as well as speed of access.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

McWhinney IR: Primary care: core values. Core values in a changing world. BMJ. 1998, 316: 1807-1809.

Saultz JW: Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Annals of Family Medicine. 2003, 1: 134-143. 10.1370/afm.23.

RCGP, General Practitioners' Committee of the BMA, NHS Alliance: Valuing General Practice. 2001, London, RCGP

Freeman G, Shepherd S, Robinson I, Ehrich K, Richards S: Continuity of care: report of a scoping exercise for the National Co-ordinating Centre forNHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D. 2001, London, National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D

Stokes T, Tarrant C, Mainous AG, Schers H, Freeman G, Baker R: Continuity of care: is the personal doctor still important? A survey of general practitioners and family physicians in England and Wales, the United States, and the Netherlands. Annals of Family Medicine. 2005, 3: 359-

Olesen F, Dickinson J, Hjortdahl P: General practice – time for a new definition. BMJ. 2000, 320: 354-357. 10.1136/bmj.320.7231.354.

Fleming DM: Continuity of care: a concept revisited. European Journal of General Practice. 2001, 6: 140-145.

Guthrie B, Wyke S: Does continuity in general practice really matter?. BMJ. 2000, 321: 734-736. 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.734.

NHS Confederation, British Medical Association: Investing in GeneralPractice: the new GMS contract. 2003, London, British Medical Association

Commission for Health Improvement: What CHI has found in primary care trusts: sector report. 2004, London, Commission for Health Improvement

National Primary Care Collaboration Development Team: 2003, Advanced Access, [http://www.npdt.org/scripts/default.asp?site_id=5&id=48]

Windridge K, Tarrant C, Freeman G, Baker R, Boulton M, Low J: Problems with a 'target' approach to access in primary care: a qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice. 2004, 54: 364-366.

Nutting PA, Goodwin MA, Flocke SA, Zyzanski SJ, Stange KC: Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when?. Annals of Family Medicine. 2003, 1: 149-155. 10.1370/afm.63.

Kearley KE, Freeman GK, Heath A: An exploration of the value of thepersonal doctor-patient relationship in general practice. British Journal of General Practice. 2001, 51: 712-717.

Schers H, Webster S, van den Hoogen H, Avery A, Grol R, van den Bosch W: Continuity of care in general practice: a survey of patients' views. British Journal of General Practice. 2002, 52: 459-462.

Hjortdahl P, Laerum E: Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction. BMJ. 1992, 304: 1287-1290.

Wasson JH, Sauvigne AE, Mogielnicki RP, Frey WG, Sox HC, Gaudette C, et al: Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men. A randomized trial. JAMA. 1984, 252: 2413-2417. 10.1001/jama.252.17.2413.

Bower P, Roland , Campbell J, Mead N: Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey. BMJ. 2003, 326: 258-262. 10.1136/bmj.326.7383.258.

Healthcare Commission: Patient survey report 2004: overview. 2004, London, Healthcare Commission

Stoddart H, Evans M, Peters TJ, Salisbury C: The provision of 'same-day' care in general practice: an observational study. Family Practice. 2003, 20: 41-47. 10.1093/fampra/20.1.41.

Seale C: The quality of qualitative research. 1999, London: Sage

Silverman D: Interpreting qualitative data. 1993, London: Sage

Silverman D: Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. 2000, London: Sage, 1

RCGP, NHS Alliance: The future of access to general practice-based primary medical care: informing the debate. 2004, London, Royal College of General Practitioners

Salisbury C: An evaluation of Advanced Access in general practice. 2005, 26-1-2005, [http://www.sdo.lshtm.ac.uk/pdf/access_salisbury2_scientific.pdf]

RCGP: The Future of General Practice: a statement by the Royal College of General Practitioners. 2004, London, RCGP

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

BMC Family Practice

Tập 7 Số 1

Thông tin tác giả