Positive inertia and proactive influencing towards sustainability: systems analysis of a frontrunner city
Tóm tắt
With an increasingly urban population, cities have an important role to play in global environmental sustainability. Cities engaged in pioneering and ongoing sustainability experimentation—the frontrunners—can lead the way towards sustainability transition, and often become the beacon for others to follow. However, the nature and the internal dynamics that make a city a frontrunner, or the role of frontrunner cities in sustainability transition beyond their boundary, remain unclear. In addition, most studies on the influence of these frontrunners are limited to passive influencing, i.e. how the practice has been duplicated by others, or how the practice is adopted and mainstreamed into system level. Based on in-depth case studies on a frontrunner city and two other cities influenced by it, this paper examines how momentum for positive changes has been initiated, built, and sustained towards changing the status quo of practice through a succession of actors and a series of reinforcing feedback loops. We argue that creating a positive inertia through sustained momentum and embedding the frontrunner identity in a city is essential for it to continue the process of sustainability transition. Frontrunners can create flow-on benefits for other cities through a proactive influencing. Supported by multiple two-way benefits, such proactive influencing is a new mechanism of mainstreaming and up-scaling urban sustainability experiments in system innovation and transition.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Acuto M. Give cities a seat at the top table. Nature. 2016;537(7622):611–3.
Affolderbach J, Schulz C. Mobile transitions: exploring synergies for urban sustainability research. Urban Stud. 2016;53(9):1942–57.
Bai X. The process and mechanism of urban environmental change: an evolutionary view. Int J Environ Pollut. 2003;19(5):528–41.
Bai X, Dawson R, Ürge-Vorsatz D, Delgado G, Salisu Barau A, Dhakal S, et al. Six research priorities for cities and climate change. Nature. 2018;555(7694):23–5.
Bai X, Imura H. A comparative study of urban environment in East Asia: stage model of urban environmental evolution. Int Rev Environ Strateg. 2000;1(1):135–58.
Bai X, Roberts B, Chen J. Urban sustainability experiments in Asia: patterns and pathways. Environ Sci Policy. 2010;13(4):312–25.
Bai X, Surveyer A, Elmqvist T, Gatzweiler FW, Guneralpe B, Parnell S, et al. Defining and advancing systems approach for sustainable cities. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2016;23:69–78.
Bai X, Wieczorek AJ, Kaneko S, Lisson S, Contreras A. Enabling sustainability transitions in Asia: the importance of vertical and horizontal linkages. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2009;76(2):255–66.
Batty M. Cities as complex systems: scaling, interactions, networks, dynamics and urban morphologies. Science. 2008;319(5864):769–71.
Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Carlsson B, Lindmark S, Rickne A. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Res Policy. 2008;37(3):407–29.
Berkhout F. Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment. Glob Environ Chang. 2002;12(1):1–4.
Berkhout F, Verbong G, Wieczorek AJ, Raven R, Lebel L, Bai X. Sustainability experiments in Asia: innovations shaping alternative development pathways? Environ Sci Policy. 2010;13(4):261–71.
Broto VC, Bulkeley H. A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Glob Environ Chang. 2013;23(1):92–102.
BRT+ Centre of Excellence and EMBARQ. Global BRTData. Version 3.46; 2019. http://www.brtdata.org. Accessed 16 Apr 2019
Bulkeley H, Castan Broto V. Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. In: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers; 2013. p. 38.
Campbell T. Learning cities: knowledge, capacity and competitiveness. Habitat Int. 2009;33(2):195–201.
City of Kitakyushu. Kitakyushu kankyou moderu toshi koudou keikaku; 2009. http://www.city.kitakyushu.lg.jp/files/000166893.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2015
Coenen L, Benneworth P, Truffer B. Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Res Policy. 2012;41(6):968–79.
de Boer Y. Sustainable development in times of crises: opposition or opportunity; 2009. https://unfccc.int/files/na/application/pdf/bonn_symposium.pdf Accessed 10 Sept 2015
Evans J, Karvonen A, Raven, R. The experimental city: New modes and prospects of urban transformation. In Evans J, Karvonen A, Raven, R (Eds.), The experimental city (1–12). London: Routledge; 2016.
Frantzeskaki N, van Steenbergen F, Stedman RC. Sustain Sci. 2018;13:1045.
Frantzeskaki N, Wittmayer J, Loorbach D. The role of partnerships in 'realising' urban sustainability in Rotterdam’s city ports area, the Netherlands. J Clean Prod. 2014;65:406–17.
Geels, FW. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Research Policy. 2004;33(6-7):897–920.
Geels FW. Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2005;72(6):681–96.
Geels FW. Multi-level perspective on system innovation: relevance for industrial transformation. In: Olsthoorn X, Wieczorek A, editors. Understanding industrial transformation. Environment & Policy, vol. 44. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006. p. 163–86.
Geels FW. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Soc Trans. 2011;1(1):24–40.
Geels FW, Schot J. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy. 2007;36(3):399–417.
Gerlak AK, Heikkila T, Smolinski SL, Huitema D, Armitage D. Learning our way out of environmental policy problems: a review of the scholarship. Pol Sci. 2018;51(3):335–71.
Homer-Dixon T, Walker B, Biggs R, Crépin A, Folke C, Lambin EF, et al. Synchronous failure: the emerging causal architecture of global crisis. Ecol Soc. 2015;20(3):6.
Hughes T. Technological momentum in history: hydrogeneration in Germany 1898–1933. Past Present. 1969;44(1):106–32.
Jacobsson S, Lauber V. The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy. 2006;34(3):256–76.
Kemp R, Loorbach D. Governance for sustainability through transition management. Montreal: Open Meeting of Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community; 2003.
Kemp R, Rotmans J. The management of the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems. In: Weber M, Hemmelskamp J, editors. Towards environmental innovation systems. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 33–55.
Laakso S, Berg A, Annala M. Dynamics of experimental governance: a metastudy of functions and uses of climate governance experiments. J Clean Prod. 2017;169:8–16.
Lange P, Driessen PP, Sauer A, Bornemann B, Burger P. Governing towards sustainability—conceptualizing modes of governance. J Environ Policy Plan. 2013;15(3):403–25.
Lee T, Jung HY. Mapping city-to-city networks for climate change action: geographic bases, link modalities, functions, and activity. J Clean Prod. 2018;182:96–104.
Loorbach D, Rotmans J. Managing transitions for sustainable development. In: Olsthoorn X, Wieczorek A, editors. Understanding industrial transformation. Environment & Policy, vol 44. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006.
Ma Y, Rong K, Mangalagiu D, Thornton TF, Zhu D. Co-evolution between urban sustainability and business ecosystem innovation: evidence from the sharing mobility sector in Shanghai. J Clean Prod. 2018;188:942–53.
Mack N, Woodsong C, MacQueen KM, Guest G, Namey E. Qualitative research methods: a data collectors field guide. Research Triangle Park: Family Health International; 2005.
Malerba F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Res Policy. 2002;31(2):247–64.
Markard J, Raven R, Truffer B. Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res Policy. 2012;41(6):955–67.
McCormick K, Kiss B. Learning through renovations for urban sustainability: the case of the Malmö innovation platform. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2015;16:44–50.
Meadows DH. Thinking in systems: a primer. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing; 2008.
Nagendra H, Bai X, Brondizio E, Lwasa S. The urban south and the predicament of global sustainability. Nature Sustain. 2018;1:341–9.
Nevens F, Frantzeskaki N, Gorissen L, Loorbach D. Urban transition labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. J Clean Prod. 2013;50:111–22.
OECD. Green growth in Kitakyushu Japan: OECD Publishing; 2013, Paris.
Peng Y, Bai X. Experimenting towards a low-carbon city: policy evolution and nested structure of innovation. J Clean Prod. 2018;174:201–12.
Peng Y, Wei Y, Bai X. Scaling urban sustainability experiments: contextualization as an innovation. J Clean Prod. 2019;227:302–12.
Quitzau M-B, Jensen JS, Elle M, Hoffmann B. Sustainable urban regime adjustments. J Clean Prod. 2013;50:140–7.
Raven R. Niche accumulation and hybridisation strategies in transition processes towards a sustainable energy system: an assessment of differences and pitfalls. Energy Policy. 2007;35(4):2390–400.
Rotmans J, Kemp R, Van Asselt M. More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight. 2001;3(1):15–31.
Ruggiero S, Martiskainen M, Onkila T. Understanding the scaling-up of community energy niches through strategic niche management theory: insights from Finland. J Clean Prod. 2018;170:581–90.
Sartorius C. Second-order sustainability—conditions for the development of sustainable innovations in a dynamic environment. Ecol Econ. 2006;58(2):268–86.
Schot J, Geels FW. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Tech Anal Strat Manag. 2008;20(5):537–54.
Schot J, Steinmueller WE. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Res Policy. 2018;47(9):1554–67.
Sengers F, Berkhout F, Wieczorek A, Raven R. Experimenting in the city. Unpacking notions of experimentation for sustainability. In: Evans J, Karvonen A, Raven R, editors. The experimental city. London: Routledge; 2016.
Seyfang G, Smith A. Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environ Politics. 2007;16(4):584–603.
Smith A, Stirling A, Berkhout F. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Res Policy. 2005;34(10):1491–510.
Sugiyama R, Imura H. Voluntary approaches in Japan: proven record of pollution control agreements and new industrial initiatives for the protection of the global environment. Corp Soc-Respons Environ Manage. 1999;6(3):128.
Truffer B, Murphy JT, Raven R. The geography of sustainability transitions: contours of an emerging theme. Environ Innov Soc Trans. 2015;17:63–72.
United Nations, Department of Econmic and Sovial Affairs, Population Division. 2018 revision of world urbanization prospects; 2018.
van der Heijden J. City and subnational governance: high ambitions, innovative instruments and polycentric collaborations? In: Jordan A, Huitema D, Van Asselt H, Forster J, editors. Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2018.
Voytenko Y, McCormick K, Evans J, Schwila G. Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda. J Clean Prod. 2016;123:45–54.
Wolfram M. Assessing transformative capacity for sustainable urban regeneration: a comparative study of three south Korean cities. Ambio. 2019;48(5):478–93.
Wolfram M, Van der Heijden J, Juhola S, Patterson J. Learning in urban climate governance: concepts, key issues and challenges. J Environ Policy Plan. 2019;21(1):1-15.