Linking Protein Quality in Biorefinery Output to Forage Crop Crude Protein Input via the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System
Tóm tắt
The biorefinery technology aiming at protein extraction is rising and identification of suitable plant biomass input with valuable protein compounds for extraction is needed. Forage crops have been evaluated by the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS), and the result used as proxy of extractable protein in a biorefinery process. This serves as a helpful link between crop production and refinery output; however, the method has never been validated. Such validation is the main aim of this study. Five forage species—white clover, red clover, lucerne, perennial ryegrass, and tall fescue—were cut at four dates during spring and processed in a lab-scale refinery (screw press and subsequent protein precipitation from the green juice). The pulp fraction and the precipitated protein concentrate were both CNCPS analyzed to follow the initial crude protein (CP) plant input into these two fractions. Total recovery in concentrate was highest for the legumes, which points to an advantage of these species in protein extraction setups. High recovery of B1 and B2 (50% or higher for the grasses) in the pulp demonstrated a large proportion of soluble protein ending up in the fibrous pulp and shed light on the reason behind high feed quality of the pulp fraction. In conclusion, the existing tentative assumption of extractable protein being equal to CNCPS fractions of B1 and B2 and partly B3 was shown to be too simplified. The presented findings can improve crop species screening in terms of expected extractable protein yield.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Boland, M. J., Rae, A. N., Vereijken, J. M., Meuwissen, M. P. M., Fischer, A. R. H., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., … Hendriks, W. H. (2013). The future supply of animal-derived protein for human consumption. Trends in Food Science and Technology. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2012.07.002
Kristensen, L., Støier, S., Würtz, J., & Hinrichsen, L. (2014). Trends in meat science and technology: the future looks bright, but the journey will be long. Meat Science, 98(3), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.023.
Buxton, D. R. (1996). Quality-related characteristics of forages as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 59(1–3 SPEC. ISS), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00885-3.
Stødkilde, L., Damborg, V. K., Jørgensen, H., Lærke, H. N., & Jensen, S. K. (2019). Digestibility of fractionated green biomass as protein source for monogastric animals. Animal, 13(9), 1817–1825. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119000156.
Pugesgaard, S., Schelde, K., Larsen, S. U., Lærke, P. E., & Jørgensen, U. (2015). Comparing annual and perennial crops for bioenergy production - influence on nitrate leaching and energy balance. GCB Bioenergy, 7(5), 1136–1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12215.
Solati, Z., Jørgensen, U., Eriksen, J., & Søegaard, K. (2017). Dry matter yield, chemical composition and estimated extractable protein of legume and grass species during the spring growth. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 97(12), 3958–3966. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8258.
Kamm, B., Schönicke, P., & Hille, C. (2016). Green biorefinery - industrial implementation. Food Chemistry, 197(B), 1341–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.088.
Damborg, V. K., Jensen, S. K., Weisbjerg, M. R., Adamsen, A. P., & Stødkilde, L. (2020). Screw-pressed fractions from green forages as animal feed: chemical composition and mass balances. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 261, 114401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114401
Santamaría-Fernández, M., Molinuevo-Salces, B., Lübeck, M., & Uellendahl, H. (2018). Biogas potential of green biomass after protein extraction in an organic biorefinery concept for feed, fuel and fertilizer production. Renewable Energy, 129, 769–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.012
Solati, Z., Manevski, K., Jørgensen, U., Labouriau, R., Shahbazi, S., & Lærke, P. E. (2018). Crude protein yield and theoretical extractable true protein of potential biorefinery feedstocks. Industrial Crops and Products, 115, 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.010
Stødkilde, L., Damborg, V. K., Jørgensen, H., Laerke, H. N., & Jensen, S. K. (2018). White clover fractions as protein source for monogastrics: dry matter digestibility and protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 98(7), 2557–2563. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8744.
Santamaria-Fernandez, M., Ambye-Jensen, M., Damborg, V. K., & Lübeck, M. (2019). Demonstration-scale protein recovery by lactic acid fermentation from grass clover – a single case of the production of protein concentrate and press cake silage for animal feeding trials. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 13(3), 502–513. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1957.
Kleen, J., Taube, F., & Gierus, M. (2011). Agronomic performance and nutritive value of forage legumes in binary mixtures with perennial ryegrass under different defoliation systems. Journal of Agricultural Science, 149(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859610000456.
Krawutschke, M., Kleen, J., Weiher, N., Loges, R., Taube, F., & Gierus, M. (2013). Changes in crude protein fractions of forage legumes during the spring growth and summer regrowth period. Journal of Agricultural Science, 151(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185961200024X.
Sleugh, B., Moore, K. J., George, J. R., & Brummer, E. C. (2000). Binary legume-grass mixtures improve forage yield, quality, and seasonal distribution. Agronomy Journal, 92(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.92124x.
Licitra, G., Hernandez, T. M., & Van Soest, P. J. (1996). Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 57(4), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3.
Sniffen, C. J., O’Connor, J. D., Van Soest, P. J., Fox, D. G., & Russell, J. B. (1992). A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science, 70(11), 3562–3577. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x.
Tylutki, T. P., Fox, D. G., Durbal, V. M., Tedeschi, L. O., Russell, J. B., Van Amburgh, M. E., & Pell, A. N. (2008). Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System: a model for precision feeding of dairy cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 143(1–4), 174–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.010.
Stødkilde, L., Eriksen, J., & Jensen, S. K. (2020). Biorefined grasses and legumes – effect of species and spring cutting date on extractable protein yield. In Meeting the future demands for grassland production. Proceedings of the 28th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation Helsinki, Finland. 19–22 October 2020. Helsinki, Finland
R Core Team. (2018). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Core Team. (2018). nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–137. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=nlme
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50(3), 346–363
Damborg, V. K., Stødkilde, L., Jensen, S. K., & Weisbjerg, M. R. (2018). Protein value and degradation characteristics of pulp fibre fractions from screw pressed grass, clover, and lucerne. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 244, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.08.004
Santamaría-Fernández, M., Karkov Ytting, N., & Lübeck, M. (2019). Influence of the development stage of perennial forage crops for the recovery yields of extractable proteins using lactic acid fermentation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 1055–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.292