The Case of the Missing Pollution Haven Hypothesis

Daniel L. Millimet1, John A. List2
1Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas
2University of Maryland and NBER, College Park, USA

Tóm tắt

One particularly vexing puzzle for economists and policymakers over the past several decades concerns the empirical significance of the theoretically predicted pollution haven hypothesis. While neoclassical theory and conventional wisdom both surmise that local economies will suffer deleterious effects from stricter environmental regulations, empirical studies have largely failed to validate such claims. This study utilizes the method of matching to show that the impact of stricter regulation is heterogeneous spatially, varying systematically based on location-specific attributes. Previous studies that assume a homogenous response may therefore inadvertently mask the overall impact of more stringent regulations by pooling unaffected and affected regions.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Becker, R., and J.V. Henderson. 2000. Effects of Air Quality Regulations on Polluting Industries. Journal of Political Economy. 108(2): 379–421

D.A. Black JA. Smith (2004) ArticleTitleHow Robust is the Evidence on the Effects of College Quality? Evidence from Matching Journal of Econometrics. 121 IssueID1–2 99–124

R. Blundell R. Griffith W. Windmeijer (2002) ArticleTitleIndividual Effects and Dynamics in Count Data Models Journal of Econometrics. 108 IssueID1 113–131

W.G. Cochran DB. Rubin (1973) ArticleTitleControlling Bias in Observational Studies: Review Sankhya-A. 35 IssueID4 417–446

R.H. Dehejia S. Wahba (2002) ArticleTitlePropensity Score Matching for Nonexperimental Causal Studies Review of Economics and Statistics. 84 IssueID1 151–161

J. Ederington (2001) ArticleTitleInternational Coordination of Trade and Domestic Policies American Economic Review. 91 IssueID5 1580–1593

P.G. Fredriksson JA. List DL. Millimet (2003) ArticleTitleBureaucratic Corruption, Environmental Policy and Inbound US FDI: Theory and Evidence Journal of Public Economics. 87 IssueID7–8 1407–1430

M. Greenstone (2002) ArticleTitleThe Impact of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments and the Census of Manufacturers Journal of Political Economy. 110 IssueID6 1175–1219

G.M. Grossman AB. Krueger (1995) ArticleTitleEconomic Growth and the Environment Quarterly Journal of Economics. 110 IssueID2 353–377

J.V. Henderson (1996) ArticleTitleEffects of Air Quality Regulation American Economic Review. 86 IssueID4 789–813

J.V. Henderson (1997) ArticleTitleExternalities and Industrial Development Journal of Urban Economics. 42 IssueID3 449–470

A.B. Jaffe SR. Peterson PR. Portney RN. Stavins (1995) ArticleTitleEnvironmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? Journal of Economic Literature 33 IssueID1 132–163

T. Jeppessen JA. List H. Folmer (2002) ArticleTitleEnvironmental Regulations and New Plant Location Decisions: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis Journal of Regional Science. 42 IssueID1 19–49

J.A. List DL. Millimet PG. Fredriksson WW. McHone (2003) ArticleTitleEffects of Environmental Regulations on Manufacturing Plant Births: Evidence from a Propensity Score Matching Estimator Review of Economics and Statistics. 85 IssueID4 944–952

J.A. List DL. Millimet WW. McHone (2003) ArticleTitleEffects of Air Quality Regulation on the Destination Choice of Relocating Firms Oxford Economic Papers. 55 IssueID4 657–678

D.L. Millimet JA. List T. Stengos (2003) The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Real Progress or Misspecified Models? Review of Economics and Statistics. 85 IssueID4 1038–1047

Mulatu A., Florax R., Withagen C. (2002). Environmental Regulations and Competitiveness. Discussion Paper #01–139/3. Tinbergen Institute

P.R. Rosenbaum DB. Rubin (1983) ArticleTitleThe Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects Biometrika. 70 IssueID1 41–55

U.S. House of Representatives, 1979. Legislative History pf tje c;eam Air Act, House Report 91-1146, U.S. 6PO

J.M. Wooldridge (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data MA: MIT Press Cambridge